data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d4d1/4d4d1176a912e672e6b4deae19ce95dd27a600ec" alt="NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 2 Presentation to the Organization"
- NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 2 Presentation to the Organization.
Introduction
Greetings, everyone. I’m Cynthia, and I am eager to introduce the transformative impact of eTAR (Electronic Treatment Administration Record) on clinical consideration workflow optimization. Today, we’ll discuss the convoluted benefits of eTAR, its impact on workflow components, and strategies to expand efficiency, wellbeing, and patient satisfaction. Explore our assessment NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 3 Manuscript for Publication for more information.
Overview of eTAR
eTAR, short for Electronic Treatment Administration Record, is an essential gadget for managing mechanized wellbeing records in clinical benefits settings. It offers a cautious solution for medication and treatment administration, open online and offline, ensuring ongoing recording, collection, and reporting of patient information.
Shift in Workflow with Evidence-Based Practice
Integrating Electronic Wellbeing Records (EHR) through eTAR revolutionizes clinical benefits workflows by providing clinicians with coordinated patient records and clinical information, streamlining patient consideration cycles, and saving enormous time.
NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 2 Presentation to the Organization
This transition draws in critical consideration professionals to take on evidence-based practices, leading to more reasonable administration, prevention, and screening of chronic issues. These advancements align with the objectives outlined in NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 2 Presentation to the Organization.
Examples of Workflow Changes
1. Fundamental Instrument for Medication and Treatment Administration:
- Works with quick and careful recording of medication and treatment administration.
- Engages clinicians to record information proficiently on a single screen.
- Gives constant updates and cautions for medication-related issues.
2. Improved Consideration and Patient Outcomes:
- Further develops clinical benefits professionals’ work, enhancing patient wellbeing and care.
- Sees and forestalls clinical errors, leading to oversaw patient outcomes.
- Informs providers of potential wellbeing issues, ensuring brief intervention for better patient consideration.
Stakeholder Engagement and Workflow Efficiency
Valuable implementation of eTAR hinges on strong stakeholder engagement and clear communication strategies. Involving key stakeholders like clinicians, staff individuals, sustain informaticists, and administrative personnel ensures methodology with organizational targets and further encourages decision-making.
Impact on Efficiency Gains and Stakeholders
Benefits of eTAR Implementation
Research indicates that eTAR implementation yields enormous efficiency gains and benefits stakeholders across various divisions:
- Refreshes organizational plentifulness and diminishes medication goofs.
- Further, communication between patients and providers is improved, leading to better patient consideration.
- Streamlines administrative errands, benefiting the billing and marketing gatherings.
Decision-Making Rationale
The decision to finish eTAR is grounded in the expectation of workflow improvement, updated patient consideration, and cost savings. By providing broad patient information, facilitating conclusions, and improving wellbeing results, eTAR contributes to practice efficiencies and supports essential organizational goals.
Strategies for Maximized Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction
Implementing online scheduling, information collection checkpoints, and motorized cautions can expand efficiency, security, and patient satisfaction. These strategies streamline workflow, minimize mishandles, and update patient-provider communication, fostering a consistent clinical consideration insight.
Conclusion
In conclusion, ETAR emerges as a transformative contraption in clinical benefits, revolutionizing workflow components, enhancing patient consideration, and aligning with organizational targets. Through stakeholder engagement, doable implementation strategies, and evidence-based practices, NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 2 Presentation to the Organization highlights how eTAR prepares for a more proficient, safer, patient-centered clinical benefits environment.
References
ARAS, S. (2021). Investigation of the effects on dose calculations of correction-based algorithms in different tissue mediums. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.841547
Baumann, L. A., Baker, J., & Elshaug, A. G. (2018). The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review. Health Policy, 122(8), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.014
Cajander, Å., & Grünloh, C. (2019). Electronic health records are more than a work tool. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI ’19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300865
Farre, A., Heath, G., Shaw, K., Bem, D., & Cummins, C. (2019). How do stakeholders experience the adoption of electronic prescribing systems in hospitals? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(12), bmjqs-2018-009082. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009082
Fuller, A. (2019). Electronic medication administration records and barcode medication administration to support safe medication practices in long-term care facilities. ERA. https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/5f13a1b6-a1e2-4f13-8b1d-7ea531d24c42
Klecun, E., Zhou, Y., Kankanhalli, A., Wee, Y. H., & Hibberd, R. (2019). The dynamics of institutional pressures and stakeholder behavior in national electronic health record implementations: A tale of two countries. Journal of Information Technology, 026839621882247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396218822478
Kruse, C. S., Stein, A., Thomas, H., & Kaur, H. (2018). The use of Electronic Health Records to support population health: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1075-6
Lindberg, D. S., Prosperi, M., Bjarnadottir, R. I., Thomas, J., Crane, M., Chen, Z., Shear, K., Solberg, L. M., Snigurska, U. A., Wu, Y., Xia, Y., & Lucero, R. J. (2020). Identifying important factors in an inpatient fall risk prediction model to improve the quality of care using EHR and electronic administrative data: A machine-learning approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 143, 104272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104272
Lyles, C. R., Nelson, E. C., Frampton, S., Dykes, P. C., Cemballi, A. G., & Sarkar, U. (2020). Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: Research priorities and best practices. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(11_Supplement), S123–S129. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0876
Wang, Q., & Laramee, R. S. (2021). EHR star: The state‐of‐the‐art in interactive EHR Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14424
Zheng, K., Ratwani, R. M., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2020). Studying workflow and workarounds in electronic health record–supported work to improve health system performance. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(11_Supplement), S116–S122. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0871