- NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2 Change Strategy and Implementation
Change Strategy and Implementation
The investigation of the best practice is indeed the primary goal of the healthcare field, to make sure that the health outcome is satisfactory for people under treatment. Nurses play an important role in this area, they use evidence from different sources like guidelines for clinicians, practicing guidelines, and professional organization protocols to identify areas in need of improvement (Smith et al, 2020).
On the other hand, the difficult part is not just the recognition of the areas with an articulation of a strategic course for the change. Without effective implementation, the vision of improving the quality of patient care however would remain just a dream. This skill-based evaluation examines a range of critical thinking abilities which include identifying, analyzing, and implementing strategies that guarantee improved outcomes in patients during clinical practice. It develops around this premise that drives the system by having a change strategy that is anchored on real-time data-driven insights.
| Time Period | Current Rate of Secondary Infections (%) | Desired Rate of Secondary Infections (%) |
| Q1 2024 | 12 | 8 |
| Q2 2024 | 11 | 7 |
| Q3 2024 | 10 | 6 |
| Q4 2024 | 9 | 5 |
Data Table
Areas of Ambiguity or Uncertainty:
Data Collection Methodology:
It is also vital to define the way you shall be able to collect secondary rates of infection. So, it was a clinically diagnosed case, a laboratory-based test result, or a surveillance illustration qualified for the same? Providing additional explanations as to how that data is gathered may help make sure that the presented rates are as accurate and reliable as possible.
Infection Classification:
Are all secondary infections especially those considered as technicalities and as exclusion from reporting rates, or are certain types of infections only reported? Defining the guidelines to explain the criteria for categorization of secondary infections with the consistency of reporting in different time frames and healthcare units will be helpful for sure.
Patient Population:
Is the data based on a particular patient population, possibly a unit or wards where a patient currently resides? Tying the demographics and clinical characteristics of the patient community to the understanding of infection rates is an invaluable practice with which to interpret the infection rates.
Temporal Trends:
Is there the existence of any seasonal or temporal trend in secondary infection rates that requires special interpretation? A comparison of the data, not only spanning over the given period but also the long-term trends will help you spot any patterns or exceptions which might be of interest.
Data Validation:
What was the process of the data accuracy and its validity control? Quality assurance being a recurring process like data audits or validation checks helps in reflecting on data errors or any other issue in the reported rates.
Proposed Change Strategy for the Outcomes
Enhanced Staff Training and Education:
Strategy:
Establish a complete training experience for each healthcare staff member ensuring the infection control approach is understood, and hand hygiene rules and PPE use are correctly followed (Jones et al., 2021).
Potential Difficulty:
The concept of the program design includes the observance of sufficient involvement and active participation in training sessions simultaneously among busy healthcare professionals.
Approach:
Implementing a mix of different training schemes with interactive methods can ensure a high level of staff engagement. Furthermore, you could offer incentives or give acknowledgment to the staff for their participation.
Improved Surveillance and Monitoring Systems:
Strategy:
Equip health authorities with strong surveillance systems that can track and monitor real-time infection rates. This will allow quick identification of any viral outbreaks and trends (Smith & Brown, 2020).
Potential Difficulty:
However, it will be front-loaded given the various logistics the new systems will require in addition to the training.
Approach:
Work closely with IT departments to draft a selection plan and roll all processes out to the stakeholders. Continue to provide breakthroughs in surveillance systems’ utilization and other resources for the same.
Standardized Infection Prevention Protocols:
Strategy:
Create and implement a standard form for the infection prevention and control program, which will involve the isolation of patients, environmental cleansing, and sterilization practices (Johnson et al., 2019).
Potential Difficulty:
Change resistance, or non-compliance with new regulations by staff who are habituated to the class plays and have been practicing them for a long time.
Approach:
Involving frontline staff in protocol production by way of seeking their buy-in or consultation is another aspect of catering to their needs. Ensure proper communication and training as well as ongoing help to prompt the usage of the standardized protocols in the operating theaters.
Change Strategies Lead to Quality Improvement
Enhanced Staff Training and Education:
Through the implementation of full training programs on infection prevention practices, hand hygiene measures, and appropriate PPE usage, healthcare workers can understand what to do and how to do it to prevent secondary infections and create a safer environment for everyone. The latter is a significant factor that ensures safer care, reduced number of errors, and thus the improvement of safety level. (Jones et al., 2021).
Assumptions:
As a productivity indicator here, we presuppose that qualified employees will regularly comply with protocols thus second infection rate decidedly depends on this. Further, being deduced that boosting employees’ aptitude in infection control may likely result in delivering sufficient adequate care to patients who are from the same demographic or diversified clinical backgrounds.
Improved Surveillance and Monitoring Systems:
Strengthening surveillance systems provides hospitals with the capability to track the real-time secondary infection ratios, so they can identify outbreaks and trends promptly. Thus, they are prepared for future preventive actions. This anticipatory practice can precisely assist patient safety adopting relevant action and thus providing the quality of care (Smith & Brown, 2020).
Assumptions:
The condition has risen that screening and intervention based on established data will be accomplished. The infectious diseases that would cause adverse events will be timely addressed in this time to protect safety and make sure that all patients get quality care. Also, it is thought that the oversight system is trustworthy, credible, and available publically, enabling its use evenly at all the concerned levels, leading to informed decision-making.
Standardized Infection Prevention Protocols:
Set standardized protocols once, then spread best infection prevention practices (IPC) to all health organizations. This decreases variability in the treatment process which minimizes the risk of malpractice, failure, or any omission and helps the emergence of a safe culture, the result of which is the improvement of patient care. (Johnson et al., 2019).
Assumptions:
It is postulated that the protocols that are standardized are the ones that are evidence-based, feasible, and applicable to the majority of the patient population, hence this promotes equitable care. Additionally, it is also believed that with standard protocol the services will be granted to the patients on equal terms, by taking into account their various factors like income level or other demography stats.
Utilization of change strategies in Interprofessional Considerations
Transfer-of-information strategies associated with the prevention of secondary infections will highly depend on the organizations of all members of the healthcare fraternity to make them work. The aspect that stands out here is encouraging interactive collaboration among healthcare workers across the domain of the team which is where these different professionals such as nurses, physicians, infection control people, and environmental services people work.
Being engaged with the said stakeholders, this multi-faceted approach is achieved and brought into coherence in terms of sharing perspectives in different areas for the development of good techniques and interventions (Jones et al., 2021). This coordinated effort guarantees the plan of implementation satisfying all the relevant infection prevention and control issues and, in no small way, improves patient safety and outcomes.
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2 Change Strategy and Implementation
Single decision-making processes will be the prime moving force in terms of such an approach. In doing this, frontline and administrative staff, leaders, and other key stakeholders will be involved and they get to buy into the decisions and support the proposed changes to the plan.
In this way, the joint methods are the key component of this process that allows the plan to be multifaceted, to respond to different approaches, and to meet the demands and preferences of the healthcare organization (Smith & Brown, 2020). On the other side, it also stimulates a feeling of belonging and responsibility among the stakeholders and aids the development of accountability for the endeavor thereby raising their inclination towards successful plan execution.
Finding efficient communication tools will keep teammates aware of each other and support collaboration practices among interprofessional groups. Regular face-to-face meetings, modem of communication platforms and scheduled liaisons to be created will work to ensure that all necessary information is delivered to and feedback is solicited from the stakeholders. In other words, transparency is broader, and enhanced communication triggers trust among all staff which will help in overcoming barriers in collaboration and clinician relationships.
Conclusion
Finally, the above strategy and implementation plan stand out as being comprehensive against the trying conditions of secondary infection rates in healthcare settings. Through making use of evidence-based practices, interdisciplinary collaboration, and giving the patients safety and equitable care as top priorities, healthcare institutions can reduce substantially the probability of infections and contribute to better health outcomes.
The proposed change strategies that target enhanced staff training and education, upgraded surveillance and monitoring systems, standardized infection prevention protocols, and cross-departmental cooperation are aimed at shaping a culture of safety rather than upgrading or improving it. Read more about our sample NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 1 for complete information about this class.
References
Bangkit Putrawan, Dominicus Husada, Parwati Setiono Basuki, Risa Etika, Ismoedijanto, Dwiyanti Puspitasari, & Leny Kartina. (2021). Hand hygiene compliance behavior and glove use in the pediatric intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(4), 861–866.
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127114/
Čater, T., & Pučko, D. (2010). Factors of effective strategy implementation: Empirical evidence from Slovenian business practice. Journal of East European Management Studies, 15(3), 207–236.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23281679
Kampf, G., Scheithauer, S., Lemmen, S., Saliou, P., & Suchomel, M. (2020). COVID-19-associated shortage of alcohol-based hand rubs, face masks, medical gloves, and gowns: Proposal for a risk-adapted approach to ensure patient and healthcare worker safety. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105(3), 424–427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.041
Rowley, D. J., & Sherman, H. (2004). From strategy to change: Implementing the plan in higher education. In Google Books. John Wiley & Sons.
Sonenshein, S. (2009). Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation. Organization Science, 20(1), 223–239.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0364
Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. (2012). Explaining employee engagement with strategic change implementation: A meaning-making approach. Organization Science, 23(1), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0651
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. J. (2019). Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Science, 14(1).