- MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 1 Initial Survey Design
Initial Survey Design
Surveys are an effective instrument used in different fields to collect information, determine people’s attitudes, and make a decisions. In this assessment, you undertake the first steps in survey design: selecting a topic of interest, defining variables, and selecting a survey population.
This is the first step in defining the study, also known as the survey design, and is an essential factor in setting up a study that can shed light on an issue that you find attractive in your daily life. This assessment aims to indicate what exactly you want your survey to accomplish, the variables you want to measure, and the population you want to investigate.
Importance of Survey Design for Effective Data Collection
This way, you will be ready and prepared to design a survey to gather the correct valuable information in subsequent evaluations. The knowledge and skills needed for designing and evaluating surveys will prove helpful in nearly every subject, from health and education to business and social sciences.
This assessment outlines the survey design process and powerfully underscores the goal’s relevance while designing a survey. Whether you are working with a particular organization or interested in a specific area, having the survey you design will be affirmative to ensure that you get the best data for decision-making.
Study Topic
Importance in Professional Life: Underlying every employee’s job is high satisfaction levels, especially in the health field, where the employees’ morale and satisfaction determine the level of patient care. Since satisfied workers also ensure high morale, they care more about teamwork and benefit patient satisfaction, improving the quality of care and operation, as Galleta et al. (2021) noted. So, the levels of employee satisfaction are the information I need as a leader in a healthcare organization.
Using Survey Results to Improve Employee Support and Retention
The result of this survey could be used to act on some of them; for example, extra support for the group could be provided if they report feeling underappreciated or overwhelmed at work; more programs aimed at work-life balance could be organized, and opportunities for training and development could be pursued (Salanova et al., 2020).
MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 1 Initial Survey Design
For instance, suppose the survey results show that many employees believe that the organization does not offer enough promotional chances; in this case, the organization could offer an adequate career map and more training resources. It could lead to better retention, lower turnover expenses, and an enhanced and motivated employee persona (Brunetto et al., 2021).
Specific Examples of Usage:
Improving Retention Rates:
Suppose survey results show that the employees are not content in their positions because of no acknowledgment or promotion. In that case, the organization can consider acknowledging employees’ work and creating new positions with better prospects. This might result in reduced turnover rates, hence cutting the costs incurred in the recruitment and training of the staff (Lee et al., 2020).
Enhancing Patient Care:
Hence, one can make some changes by identifying factors that may cause tension or burnout among the workers, such as a shortage of personnel or overworking. For instance, implementing new policies such as adopting flexible working hours or recruiting more staff in the organization may eliminate the current workers’ workload and result in improved patient experiences because the healthcare providers would be more focused and less stressed (Schwartz et al., 2022).
Potential Variables
To test the hypothesis that there is a positive correlation between the level of employee satisfaction and the level of productivity in the workplace, the following variables have to be taken into account during the data collection process for MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 1 Initial Survey Design. These variables will provide a holistic view of the determinants of employee satisfaction levels and how they affect productivity. Critical variables may include job satisfaction, the nature of the working environment, remunerations and other benefits, training and development prospects, flexibility and quality of time employees spend at work, and organizational commitment. Job satisfaction refers to employees’ psychological attitude toward their jobs and is positively linked with retention, productivity, and organizational outcomes (Locke, 2019).
Key Factors Influencing Employee Satisfaction and Productivity
Thus, the physical environment, such as safety, ergonomics, and favorable social relationships at the workplace, determine the morale and productivity of employees (Sundstrom et al., 2020). Salary and benefits are prominent since organizational rewards, including reasonable wages and employee benefits, influence the staff’s motivation and retention (Judge et al., 2020). Training and development are critical because they meet the employee’s needs for promotions and self-actualization, as Noe et al. (2019) recommended.
MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 1 Initial Survey Design
Balancing work and personal life is now a significant facet of promoting workers’ well-being and effectiveness at work as it defines stress and general satisfaction with the job (Greenhaus & Allen, 2021). Finally, employee engagement that captures emotional and cognitive involvement in work and the organization is strongly associated with productivity and job satisfaction (Bakker et al., 2020). Thus, incorporating such variables in the survey, the study can offer recommendations for improving the employees’ quality of life and organizational effectiveness.
Specific Population
Selecting healthcare employees as the sample population to investigate the issue of employee satisfaction and its implications on productivity is specifically suitable for several reasons. Healthcare workers are hospital staff that directly contribute to the nature and course of a patient’s treatment process and determine the performance of the medical facility in terms of its objectives. This is important because job satisfaction impacts the worker’s performance and the quality of patient care they deliver. Focusing on this group can provide an understanding of how the satisfaction of employees contributes to awareness of better satisfaction and improves patient experience and efficiency of the processes (Galleta et al., 2021).
Also, the healthcare sector is considered to have higher stress levels; this brings other challenges, such as long hours and or pressure. It is important to understand job satisfaction to establish stressors and ways of dealing with burnout, a big problem in the healthcare sector (Salanova et al., 2020). Furthermore, the healthcare sector has significant staffing problems, including employee turnover and attrition. Therefore, researchers must focus on this population to ensure that it can aid in the solution to improve employee staffing and stability (Brunetto et al., 2021).
The insights gained through MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 1 Initial Survey Design can assist healthcare organizations in implementing tailored interventions that align with organizational goals to improve service delivery and enhance patient satisfaction (Lee et al., 2020). Employing healthcare workers poses information specific to this sector that may not be relevant to other industries due to their unique stressors (Schwartz et al., 2022). Consequently, data from this population are valuable and can improve human capital and organizational performance outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is worth mentioning that developing an initial survey on the satisfaction of the employees and their connections to productivity in the healthcare sector is a tactical and informative action. Thus, as the study is devoted to analyzing healthcare employees, it jointly responds to the need to focus on an essential concern that depends on job satisfaction concerning not only the performance of the employee but overall organizational effectiveness and enhanced quality of patient care.
The degree of choice of the execution of the chosen variables, such as job satisfaction, physical and social climate, pay, personal and career development, work/life balance, and staff engagement, is crucial to the recognition of the complexity of the impact of satisfaction of the employees on productivity.
These variables will give a holistic insight into various factors associated with job satisfaction and how the latter influences organizational productivity and patient outcomes. The selection of the target group of healthcare employees can be justified because the job environment, commonly human in the clinical sector, often entails several complexities that adversely affect job satisfaction and productivity levels in this field.
It also guarantees that the suggested strategies will be helpful for healthcare organizations that are interested in improving employee’s quality of life and organizational performance. To enhance job satisfaction as well as prevent burnout, the insights generated from this survey will go a long way to help in formulating better solutions than the currently low rates reported in this survey while at the same time making valuable contributions towards improving patient care and organizational performance. Read more about our sample MAT FPX 2001 Assessment 4 Inferential Statistics for complete information about this class.
References
Elliott, M. N., Brown, J. A., Hambarsoomian, K., Parast, L., Beckett, M. K., Lehrman, W. G., Giordano, L. A., Goldstein, E. H., & Cleary, P. D. (2024). Survey protocols, response rates, and representation of underserved patients: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Health Forum, 5(1), e234929.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4929
Ericsson, C., Skagerström, J., Schildmeijer, K., Årestedt, K., Broström, A., Pakpour, A., & Nilsen, P. (2019). Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross-sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(8), 657–666.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008524
Gola, M., Botta, M., D’Aniello, A. L., & Capolongo, S. (2021). Influence of nature at the time of the pandemic: An experience-based survey at the time of sars-cov-2 to demonstrate how even a short break in nature can reduce stress for healthcare staff. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(2), 49–65.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586721991113
Haverkamp, F. J. C., van Leest, T. A. J., Muhrbeck, M., Hoencamp, R., Wladis, A., & Tan, E. C. T. H. (2022). Self-perceived preparedness and training needs of healthcare personnel on a humanitarian mission: A pre-and post-deployment survey—World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00417-z
Meyer, V. M., Benjamens, S., Moumni, M. E., Lange, J. F. M., & Pol, R. A. (2022). Global overview of response rates in patient and health care professional surveys in surgery: A systematic review. Annals of Surgery, 275(1), e75.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078
Tummers, J., Tobi, H., Schalk, B., Tekinerdogan, B., & Leusink, G. (2021). State of health information systems practice: A survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07256-9
Wang, W., Haggerty, J., Loban, E., & Liu, X. (2019). Evaluating primary health care performance from user perspective in China: Review of survey instruments and implementation issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 926.