NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 FREE DOWNLOAD
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Disaster Management Plan
Student name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6020: Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice 1
Professor Name
Submission Date
Slide: 01
Disaster Management Plan
Hi everyone, I am __________. This presentation will talk about my proposal to resolve the issue of infection control in the post-2024 Minnesota Flood with an emphasis on the strategies to ensure the safety of the population and mitigate the risk of diseases.
Slide: 02
The Minnesota Flood 2024 has presented a significant health issue to the population because there is the risk of an imminent outbreak of infectious disease. The floodwaters tend to be filled with lethal pathogens, which increase susceptibility to waterborne and water-borne diseases, as well as respiratory diseases (Basaria et al., 2023).
Children, the older generation, and individuals with chronic health conditions are more susceptible and prone. The prevention of disaster management should be implemented, as well as through early detection and rapid response. In this plan, the elements of evidence-based practices in reducing the risk of infection and protecting the health of the population are identified.
Slide: 03
Evidence-Based Interventions
The 2024 Minnesota Flood has demonstrated the manifestation of public health issues due to a high probability of outbreaks of infectious diseases because of water invasion, displacement, and disruption of medication facilities. Examples of pathogens that will be addressed in the event of floodwaters are Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Leptospira, which can cause gastrointestinal, skin, and respiratory infections. According to Lee et al. (2020), the existence of a post-flood environment can also help increase the number of cases of the spread of the vectors due to the presence of the breeding ground of the mosquitoes in the stagnant waters.
Vulnerable populations (children, the elderly and those with chronic diseases) are people who are at risk of developing complications associated with these infections. To counter such risks, adoption of evidence-based disaster management plan should be adopted, with the use of a combination of prevention, early detection and timely intervention measures. The presented plan is filled with specific research-based interventions to make sure that the pressure of infectious diseases becomes minimal in the case of floods in Minnesota.
Slide: 04
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions
The initial step in mitigating the risk of infection is the implementation of strict water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) policies in any evacuation centre and amongst the infections where the infections are widespread. This must involve the distribution of EPA-approved water cleansing pills, placing portable hand washing stations, and provision of personal hygiene packets, including soap, alcohol containing sanitizers, and disinfectants. According to Merid et al. (2023), clean water and sanitation as a response to floods can reduce the occurrence of diarrheal diseases by 40 percent.
Shelter staff and volunteers should be trained on how to dispose of waste properly, disinfection, and safe food handling in order to prevent contamination. The public health messages should be further used in enforcing hand hygiene and safe drinking water; the messages are delivered via the use of radio, text messages, and leaders in the community. These activities play a critical role in preventing the spread of infectious agents through contact with water and person-to-person contagion.
Slide: 05
Vaccination and Preventive Healthcare
Special immunization campaigns will be introduced in order to decrease the prevalence of preventable diseases and conditions, such as hepatitis A, tetanus, influenza, etc. According to Yamaguchi and Kinoshita (2023), the tetanus boosters should be provided to people who suffered injuries due to the floods, as contaminated wounds are among the most common risks to health after the disaster. The MHUs can be sent to areas near the evacuation centers where they can set up vaccinations, quick health screening and dispensing prophylactic drugs where there is a need to do so.
Preventive care should also be considered to distribute mosquito nets and larvicides to prevent or limit the spread of a disease. Additionally, the priority groups are to receive refills of the chronic disease medications to avoid the threat of immunosuppression-related infections (Chan et al., 2020). The suggested preventive healthcare solutions can reduce the morbidity and mortality rates both in the flood-recovery phase and afterward.
Slide: 06
Surveillance, Rapid Response, and Community Engagement
An effective disease surveillance system should also be established, in which real-time monitoring and response to outbreaks of infections take place. This includes the daily health data of shelters, clinics, and mobile units and lab tests of suspected cases at a fast pace. The study conducted by Meckawy et al. (2022) shows that it is possible to prevent the occurrence of massive outbreaks on the disaster sites due to timely detection and quick isolation, and treatment.
The participation of local communities is vital, and the health liaisons are trained local volunteers who spread information about the symptoms, prevention tips, and care accessibility to their community. Cooperation with the local media, religious groups, and schools can help amplify the application of correct health information to refute misinformation. With the organized surveillance, quick response, and community involvement, the risks of infections from the 2024 Minnesota Flood can be minimized effectively, and community resilience can be enhanced.
Slide: 07
Ethical Decision Making
The 2024 Minnesota Flood should also ensure that disaster preparedness is done in an ethical manner, such that there is a conscious effort to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in order to ensure that all groups of people are subject to the same levels of equity and support. In the planning process, the special vulnerability of the low-income families, elderly residing in the area, people with disabilities, immigrant groups, and representatives of Native American communities in the territories at risk of floods were considered in terms of risk assessment (Kuran et al., 2020).
Possible disparity in the services offered to the community in floods, as indicated by community feedback (informal data) and available community data in the public health reports, includes shelter, medical services, and clean water. It is these facts that informed the distribution of resources to ensure that no people were left behind due to the institutional injustices or the geographical distance. The plan also involved culturally competent communication plans, including providing multilingual alerts in case of an emergency and forming alliances with local leaders to create a sense of trust and delivery of correct delivery of accurate information. This approach of disaster response takes into account the provision of fairness, respect, and equal opportunities to the disaster victims in the protection of health and safety.
Potential biases, e.g., the tendency to attach greater importance to the urban population in comparison to the rural one; the English-speaking population in contrast to the non-English-speaking population, were openly addressed during the planning process. A case in point is the rural tribal societies and farm workers who are not always taken into account during quick action work were represented in evacuation lines, resource allocation systems and health outreach initiatives. Collaborations with the community groups ensured that evacuation shelters were available to individuals with mobility challenges, as well as the provision of food, considering the cultural makeup of the population.
Special attention was paid to find mobile medical departments in terms of underserved regions, which may also be a barrier in the context of healthcare during the course and in the post-flood period (Patel et al., 2024). The planning team conducted regular bias-awareness reviews with the assistance of the feedback of the community representatives to identify and make changes to the assumptions in the planning that could limit the potential of the plan. This was to ensure that the response plan was operationally efficient and socially accountable.
The inclusion of the idea of DEI into the professional training of the Minnesota Flood improved the disaster management plan and made the plan more successful, as it was not only morally appropriate but also practically applicable. The plan significantly reduces the amount of health inequity that would otherwise arise in the situation of a crisis by identifying the vulnerable populations in advance and removing the impediments to assist sooner than possible (Rod et al., 2023).
Community trust was also established through inclusive decision-making, which is essential in the mandatory evacuation clearance and participation in health intercepts. The fact that they had an open process of engagement allowed the community to make input on an endless basis; therefore, the plan was created according to the needs of the community and not a one-size-fits-all approach. This implies that ethical preparedness does not only entail protecting the lives of people but also rights, dignity and equity in times of crisis. This model demonstrates that disaster planning might be turned into a tool of enhancement of social justice, as well as the assurances that no damage would be inflicted upon the population.
Slide: 08
Leadership and Collaboration with the Team
The successful disaster response scenarios in the case of Minnesota Flood 2024 will be based on the successful planning of a typical plan for a significant disaster, which includes the interprofessional interaction, the acute location of the functions, and the coordination of the activities of different teams. The emergency management officials will take overall coordination, in which the evacuation procedures and the work of the shelters and the communication systems will function accordingly. The implementation of infection control techniques, which will be performed by the public health specialists, may involve the proper utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the monitoring of the events that can become an outbreak in temporary shelters (Houghton et al., 2020).
Nurses, physicians, and other healthcare providers will offer the required services in the sphere of medicine and cure chronic diseases and treat acute needs, which will manifest as a consequence of the disaster. Displaced families and individuals will be facilitated by mental health professionals and social workers and provided with counseling, crisis intervention and recovery resources. The plan will ensure the rapid response and organization of all the required functions, including physical and emotional safety and well-being, through the integration of various functions.
A cohesive system of command will enhance transparency in spheres of cooperation, in such a way that all interprofessional teams will share information in real-time and pursue joint objectives. The agencies of public health and the teams of healthcare will cooperate in implementing the infection control measures, whereas the law enforcement and the emergency services on the ground will make sure that the safety and the security of the transportation of the resources are aligned (Thandar et al., 2021).
Food distributions, restroom facilities, and accommodation facilities will be coordinated by community leaders and volunteer organizations using volunteer organizations such as the Red Cross. The communication expert will ensure that the application of multilingual and accessible information will be availed to inform all the affected individuals regardless of their disability and language barrier. The cohesion of the team through frequent briefings and mutual planning will allow finding a fast solution to a particular issue and hold the teams responsible for performing the designated duties. Such a well-coordinated communication ensures that the health, safety and dignity of all the affected people are effectively deployed by all the competencies of all the teams.
Slide: 09
Evaluate Emergency Preparedness and Readiness
The level of preparedness and readiness of the systems level of partners during the artificial and natural disaster conditions is assessed through adequate capacity assessment, coordination of organizational services and services, as well as resource distribution. Availability of an established incident command structure is one of the greatest benefits of most of the partnering organizations, hence offering a smooth flow of communication and decision-making in an emergency situation. The entities also have mutual aid agreements and supply chains that are liable to be activated at the right time.
The other benefit is associated with the frequent training exercises they undertake, i.e., tabletop simulations and full-scale exercises to equip them with the situational awareness and ability to respond in a competent manner (Samardzic et al., 2020). Weaknesses are, however, established on issues that involve interoperable communication systems, which can be unreliable when the number of people in need is large and unequal distribution of resources between the sectors of the country. More so, the disparity in training in the smaller partner agencies that is disaster-specific can slow down the coordination of a complex emergency.
Slide: 10
Weaknesses
The best action measures to enhance the weaknesses include the adoption of unified communication standards on all responding bodies, pre-positioning of required supplies to the high-risk areas with limited resources, and increased funding of interprofessional training programs. This sequence of actions best suits the Minnesota Flood 2024 case because it would directly deal with the bottlenecks of disaster response that were identified, such as rapid mobilization of resources and the loss of communication with one another during the disaster-related failure of the infrastructure sources. It has been demonstrated that standardized systems such as the National Incident Management System (NIMS) enhance multi-agency interoperability and minimize delays in responding with the use of standardized systems. Similarly, the past cases of disaster events have demonstrated that the time of response can be significantly minimized due to the de-grouping of resources and joint training (Elkbuli et al., 2021).
This plan includes active detection of the problems and reduction of the revealed weak points, which will increase the built capabilities, allowing all partners to be not only response-ready but also able to keep coordinated actions under the conditions of long-term disaster operations. This is a system-level practice that enhances resilience and recovery efforts.
Slide: 11
Evaluation and Recommendations
Another important role is communication, and it assists in developing coordinated, efficient, and safe care during a public health emergency, in particular, in infection control. The current communication systems between the healthcare provider and the public health agencies and community partners are usually disjointed, to the point of having piecemeal EHR systems or negotiated data-sharing policies, which may cause delays in information delivery or misinterpretation of vital information. The example is that due to the absence of standard forms of reporting in the case of an outbreak, the definition of the case may be different, and the response operation will be hindered.
Sustained studies indicate that the utilization of particular structured communication tools, such as Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) and real-time collaborative dashboards, reduced the amount of errors and improved decision-making (Pinto et al., 2024). Therefore, these lapses can be remedied by interoperability of various health information systems and using frameworks to fill the gaps by considering the privacy legislation, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
Slide: 12
Recommendations
In order to enhance it, it is recommended to provide the mandatory cross-training of the healthcare units on the protocols of communications, increase the finances of the integrated public health data system, and develop standing agreements to enable quick information-sharing among partnering organizations. The advantages of such recommendations include increased situational awareness, reduced redundancy of efforts, and increased trust between the agencies and their communities.
Any potential challenges are initial investments in the assimilation of technologies, regular training, and effective access to communication technologies in low-resource areas. Nevertheless, the World Health Organization (2025) explains the topicality of such investments as a more rationalized approach to the outbreak, reduction of morbidity, and more efficient overall population penetration, considering that the given methods of infection control preparedness are not only possible but also ethically justified in the long-term perspective.
Slide: 13
Communication Plan
Communication on the matter of infection control requires a powerful roadmap, which can support the significance of message delivery in a timely, precise, and culturally sensitive way to both the responsible staff and the general population. Regarding interprofessional teams, the updates and the status of the outbreak, as well as the changes in the protocol, should be communicated via secure digital systems, i.e., HIPAA-compliant messaging applications and shared incident command dashboards (Machon et al., 2020).
Various channels (social media, local radio, text messaging, and text flyers in different languages) are made available to the community so that information reaches different communities. The messages should be brief, action-based and science-based and speak about individual responsibility, e.g., good hand hygiene, wearing a mask, and vaccination and local action to protect one another. Such feedback measures should be incorporated as a component of how leaders communicate, so that the awareness can be easily measured and the messages altered on the spot, e.g., short surveys or responses of a hotline may be further enhanced.
Slide: 14
Conclusion
The simple plan that can be used in relation to the Minnesota Flood 2024 is that the evidence-based measures are incorporated into the response plan in order to reduce the risk of infection and to make sure that vulnerable population groups are not in danger. The integration of the DEI principles into the plan will ensure that the communities are enjoying equal access to resources and services.
Efficiency and coordination are encouraged by good interprofessional cooperation and well-defined roles. Readiness is improved by making sure that communication, training, and resource allocation are enhanced in the areas where the systems are weak. Such an approach is helpful not only to secure short-term protection but also community resiliency.
Struggling with communication strategies? Get expert guidance with NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3 Communication Handout. Click here to boost your grades!
Instructions To Write NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Instructions to write NURS-FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Assignment: Using the risks you determined in Assessment 1, create a 15-slide presentation outlining a disaster management strategy.
Vital Elements for Your Presentation
1. Create Strategies Based on Evidence
- Provide a detailed action plan for tackling the infection control concerns identified in your initial evaluation.
- Provide research evidence to back up every action (for example, “Establish mobile handwashing stations in evacuation shelters – supported by CDC recommendations on hygiene during floods”).
2. Discuss Integration, Equity, and Diversity (DEI)
- Explain how your strategy takes into account the needs of all vulnerable groups, including the elderly, people with disabilities, and non-native English speakers.
- Make sure everyone has fair access to assets and data to demonstrate moral decision-making.
3. Describe the Roles of the Expert Team
- Create a well-defined plan that specifies who is in charge of what (for instance, Public Health: tracking contacts; Nurses: providing PPE and doing triage; Local Government: setting up shelters).
- Emphasize areas where several teams collaborate.
4. Assess the Readiness of Partners
- Evaluate your community’s present crisis management systems’ advantages and disadvantages.
- Describe how your proposal fills the current preparedness gaps.
5. Make a Plan for Communication
- Describe the procedures for informing the public and other agencies about important information.
- Discuss problems (such as power outages and language obstacles) and provide fixes (like radio broadcasts or multilingual text notifications).
List of Technical Specifications
- Length: Roughly fifteen slides long.
- Format: Use Microsoft PowerPoint or a similar program formatting.
- Presenter Documents: Provide thorough remarks beneath each slide in the “Notes” section.
- Design: Keep clear of confusing backdrops and use a neat, expert layout.
- Use a minimum of three academic sources in APA format.
- APA Format: Make use of a reference slide and appropriate in-text citations.
Point to be noted: Use bullet points to make your slides easier to read and organize them with distinct headings. In your speaker notes, provide succinct, fact-based justifications for each argument.
Instructions File For 6020 Assessment 2
Assessment 2
Disaster Management Plan Presentation
Instructions
Develop a disaster management plan, in the form of a presentation, for addressing the risks you’ve identified in your risk assessment.
Introduction
In your first assessment, you assessed risks and areas of need for a potential crisis situation and community you chose to focus on. In this assessment, you’ll develop a disaster management plan for actually addressing the risks you identified earlier, and you’ll do it in the form of a presentation.
As a master’s-prepared nurse, you may well find yourself in situations that call for you to lead by bringing different stakeholders and representatives of agencies together. For this assessment, imagine that you’re making a presentation to a group of leaders of local, state, and federal organizations. You’ve been tasked with giving clarity for the management of a disaster.
Preparation
As with your previous assessment, you’ll need to incorporate research to share the most relevant and applicable knowledge in the field about how to handle the type of situation you’ve selected. This will also make your plan more compelling. So be sure to spend time researching information about experiences and solutions for the type of disaster you’re focusing on. Also, if you haven’t already, familiarize yourself with PowerPoint or similar software.
Instructions
In your presentation:
Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Your disaster management plan should provide the specific steps of your plan to reduce risks of infection during the natural or manmade disaster you chose for your first assessment.
Draw from current research to provide evidence to support the steps you’re planning. By doing that, you’ll strengthen your case among your audience for why these are important steps in this situation.
Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Just as when you identified risks in your first assessment, it should be clear in your disaster management plan how the recommended steps best address the specific needs of the different affected populations of the location you’ve selected.
Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Your plan should take into account the perspectives of the different interprofessional teams that will need to implement the plan, and it should clearly let those teams know their roles and points of collaboration. It should address the totality of what has to be managed: who should be involved and what steps should they implement? For example, how would you coordinate the implementation of infection control measures, such as proper use of personal protective equipment?
Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
As with any plan, provide not only the action steps, but rationales for why these are the best-suited steps for the situation. Your process of evaluation will call out the typical strengths and weaknesses of disaster response plans and partner organizations, and how this plan addresses those. Support your evaluation with research.
Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Include a communication plan. How would you recommend communicating with people about infection control to help them make better choices about mitigating their risk related to infection? Your evaluation process will share research and insight about why you prioritized these steps.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Is your presentation clear and persuasive for the different people who make up your professional audience, and does it use APA style?
Use PowerPoint or similar software.
Additional Requirements
To achieve a successful assessment experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements.
Tools and technology: You may use PowerPoint or other presentation software of your choice.
Written communication: Make sure your writing is succinct and clear, and is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Speaker notes: Submit your PowerPoint (or similar file) and include your speaker notes in your PowerPoint.
Design quality: Employ effective design strategies to visually organize the information. Avoid colored slide backgrounds and backgrounds with texture, as they have the effect of reducing viewer comprehension. Use graphics to call attention to, highlight, and clarify information for the viewer. Graphics that do not directly support specific content on your slide are distracting and reduce viewer comprehension.
Length of presentation: About 15 slides.
Resources: Include a minimum of three current scholarly sources (peer-reviewed articles, books, websites, and dissertations) to support your case.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Refer to the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Design person-centered care that integrates biological, psychological, and social factors and considers their complex interactions.
Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Competency 2: Propose improvements to system-level interventions to protect populations.
Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Competency 3: Collaborate to protect population health.
Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Scoring guide for 6020 Assessment 2
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Criterion 1
Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for why these are the most appropriate interventions.
Proficient
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Basic
Designs interventions, though they may not be supported by evidence or the most effective for mitigating population health risks.
Non Performance
Does not design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Criterion 2
Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations, and describes how inclusive needs, including potential biases, were identified and addressed in the process of developing a plan.
Proficient
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Basic
Demonstrates ethical decision making, though without addressing important opportunities for inclusion in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Non Performance
Does not demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Criterion 3
Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities, providing role-specific details to help make the plan actionable.
Proficient
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Basic
Develops a plan that takes into consideration some interprofessional roles and responsibilities, though leaving out other important roles and responsibilities.
Non Performance
Does not lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Criterion 4
Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level, providing examples of strengths and weaknesses.
Proficient
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Basic
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters, though the evaluation may not look at the most important elements or not those on a systems level.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Criterion 5
Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, providing examples to illustrate the pros and cons of the recommendations.
Proficient
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Basic
Makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, but without evaluating important options.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Criterion 6
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
Proficient
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Basic
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
Non Performance
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
References For NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Basaria, A., Ahsan, A., Nadeem, A., Tariq, R., & Raufi, N. (2023). Infectious diseases following hydrometeorological disasters: Current scenario, prevention, and control measures. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 85(8), 3778–3782. https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000001056
Chan, E., Sham, T., Shahzada, T., Dubois, C., Huang, Z., Liu, S., Hung, K., Tse, S., Kwok, K., Chung, P.-H., Kayano, R., & Shaw, R. (2020). Narrative review on health-education primary prevention measures for vector-borne diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165981
Elkbuli, A., Herrera, M., Awan, M., & Elassad, C. (2021). Striving towards an effective emergency preparedness and disaster management response: Lessons learned and future directions. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 50, 804–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.036
Houghton, C., Meskell, P., Delaney, H., Smalle, M., Glenton, C., Booth, A., Chan, X. H. S., Devane, D., & Biesty, L. M. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: A rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013582
Kuran, C. H. A., Morsut, C., Kruke, B. I., Krüger, M., Segnestam, L., Orru, K., Nævestad, T. O., Airola, M., Keränen, J., Gabel, F., Hansson, S., & Torpan, S. (2020). Vulnerability and vulnerable groups from an intersectionality perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101826
Lee, J., Perera, D., Glickman, T., & Taing, L. (2020). Water-related disasters and their health impacts: A global review. Progress in Disaster Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100123
Machon, M., Knighten, M. L., & Sohal, J. (2020). Improving clinical communication and collaboration through technology: Nurse Leader, 18(5), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.06.003
Meckawy, R., Stuckler, D., Mehta, A., Al-Ahdal, T., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2022). Effectiveness of early warning systems in the detection of infectious disease outbreaks: A systematic review. BioMed Central Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14625-4
Merid, M. W., Alem, A. Z., Chilot, D., Belay, D. G., Kibret, A. A., Asratie, M. H., Shibabaw, Y. Y., & Aragaw, F. M. (2023). Impact of access to improved water and sanitation on diarrhea reduction among rural under-five children in low and middle-income countries: A propensity score matched analysis. BioMed Central, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00525-9
Patel, J., More, S., Sohani, P., Bedarkar, S., Dinesh, K. K., Sharma, D., Dhir, S., Sushil, S., Taneja, G., & Ghosh, R. S. (2024). Sustaining the mobile medical units to bring equity in healthcare: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal for Equity in Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02260-x
Pinto, F., Roberto, P., Ferrario, L., Marotta, L., Montani, D., Auletta, G., Zoppini, L., & Foglia, E. (2024). Using “situation‐background‐assessment‐recommendation” method in palliative care to enhance handover quality and nursing practice: A mixed-method study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 34(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17537
Rod, M. H., Rod, N. H., Russo, F., Klinker, C. D., Reis, R., & Stronks, K. (2023). Promoting the health of vulnerable populations: Three steps towards a systems-based re-orientation of public health intervention research. Health & Place, 80(80). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102984
Samardzic, M. B., Doekhie, K. D., & Wijngaarden, J. D. H. (2020). Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: A systematic review of the past decade. Human Resources for Health, 18(2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3
Thandar, M. M., Matsuoka, S., Rahman, O., Ota, E., & Baba, T. (2021). Infection control teams for reducing healthcare-associated infections in hospitals and other healthcare settings: A protocol for systematic review. British Medical Journal Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044971
World Health Organization. (2025). The changing face of pandemic risk: How we need to adapt, protect, and connect. https://www.who.int/news/item/05-02-2025-the-changing-face-of-pandemic-risk–how-we-need-to-adapt–protect-and-connect
Yamaguchi, J., & Kinoshita, K. (2023). The threat of a new tetanus outbreak due to urban flooding disaster requires vigilance: A narrative review. Acute Medicine and Surgery, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.839
Best Professors To Choose From For 6020 Class
- Maja Zelihic, MA, PhD, MBA.
- Tyler Zerwekh, DrPH, MPH.
- Melissa Zgola, EdD, MS.
- Larry Barlow, PhD, MS.
- JacQualine Abbe, DNP, MSN.
(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2
Question 1: From where to download a free sample for NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2?
Answer 1: Tutors Academy is a platform where you can easily download NURS-FPX6020 Assessment 2.
Question 2: Where can I find the instruction file and scoring guide for the 6020 assessment 2?
Answer 2: You can get both from Tutors Academy.
Question 3: What is NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 Disaster Management Plan about?
Answer 3: This assessment focuses on developing a disaster management plan in the form of a presentation, building on the Risk Assessment from Assessment 1.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery