- NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1 Nongovernmental Agencies Involved.
Political Landscape Analysis
Traditionally, expert-driven clinical focus frameworks have been the standard. This implies that the expert staff has the best power base to influence change, conventions, and policies. As the second Head Nursing Officer in four years, the objective is to keep supporting practitioners under the nursing standard rather than transitioning them to the clinical banner and expecting that they should join the hospitalist team or they will not be eligible for emergency center privileges. As a Head Nursing Officer, I consider this unacceptable. This paper, part of the NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1 Nongovernmental Agencies Involved, will examine lines of power, including organizational power dynamics, and their impact on organizational policy, ethics, and objectives. Explore our assessment NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 2 Global Issue Problem Description for more information about this class.
Formal and Informal Lines of Power
Informal vs Formal Power
Power bases can be informal and formal (Capella School, 2022). For example, informal organizations like Evident level practice supplier (Application) family relationship planning through message board gathering, Facebook, and all nurses.com can be instrumental. Applications that can be orchestrated through family relationship networks often show more confidence while mentioning drugs for patients. For this situation, Applications banded along with a measure of 15 APRNs who are against the transition; they contend that since the clinical gatekeeper practice guides their preparation, they ought to stay under the standard of nursing (Huynh & Haddad, 2022).
Impact of Formal Power
Formal power bases, like an organization of subject matter experts, can impact clinical focus policy because of the sheer number of trained professionals. Experts have banded together in this situation and would like clinical supervisor practitioners to comply with instead of the flag of nursing. Regardless, since help practitioners are limited by the Clinical Gatekeeper Practice Act in their state (Huynh & Haddad, 2022), this should be a palatable contention for why clinical orderlies should remain under the nursing standard.
Organizational Power Dynamic
Assessing the political landscape in an organization begins with seeing the fundamental political entertainers in the organization. Understanding the political landscape can help with concluding whether a specific arrangement will work; on the other hand, on the off-open door, it will work contrastingly with a clear impact. On this occasion, there are a more significant number of experts than the Application; this gives them a stronger voice; nonetheless, the Application contention is sound and will organize the decision of the CNO to decline the difference in the policy.
Without understanding the political landscape, Applications developing a quality improvement project (QIP) cannot say whether their QIP will be finished without any problems. Acquiring absolute buy-in from all political entertainers is key to consistent undertaking implementation (Yazdanshenas & Mirzaei, 2022).
Impact on Organizational Policy
People with essential impact straightforwardly affect organizational policy impact. While the experts are engaging to have the systematic practitioners moved under their Pennant, fifteen APRNs have moved nearer to being held under the Banner of Nursing since the Clinical Watchman Practice Act works with their preparation. In their state, focuses are responsible for credentialing practitioners. Traditionally, practitioners are not credentialed in focuses; they work under a trained professional, and in a state like Las Vegas, Nevada, where this student is from, they are credentialed, yet genuinely need to work under a subject matter expert. This is not comparable to the clinical chaperone practice acts, which offer them autonomous honors (Wiesen, 2022).
Primary Strategic Objective
One method for pushing toward questions connected with the political landscape in an organization is to concentrate on permission to control information. For example, who is in control of the progression of information? For this situation, verbal exchange is reasonable in how support practitioners see that the experts are fighting to move them under their StandardStandard. Consolidating a change, for example, would adjust how practitioners approach their responsibilities, which is often infuriating (Office for Clinical Advantage Exploration and Quality [AHRQ], 2022).
Challenges in Role Transition
This would be an enormous change to move support practitioners to the clinical StandardStandard; support; support practitioners would need to stick to the clinical gatekeeper practice, which makes this a confusing change. Additional information would be how occupations will be depicted and how functions will be performed. Strategies for incorporating this should be coordinated, not preventing practitioners from following the Clinical Chaperone Practice Act (Office for Clinical Advantage Exploration and Quality [AHRQ], 2022).
Ethical Dimensions of Power
Is it fitting to discard clinical regulators from the nursing level of getting ready in an emergency community and move them to the expert-focused level of planning? Each clinical advantage organization and enacts colossal blueprints, in any event, should not straightforwardly conflict with state moves close, for example, the Efficient Practice Act. The policy ought to consolidate autonomy, quality, goodness, and ampleness. While the AMA Code of Clinical Morals consolidates these (American Clinical Association, n.d.), orderlies are not confined by the clinical game plan of rules. They are limited by the nursing set of standards (Organization for Clinical Advantages Exploration and Quality [AHRQ], 2022).
Conclusion
The argument that support practitioners should remain under their flag, under nursing oversight, is sound. Nursing oversight reviews the Clinical Chaperone Practice Act to ensure support practitioners are working within their level of training (Huynh & Haddad, 2022). Since there is no alternate level of training under the clinical banner, it is unreasonable to change support practitioners and expect them to meet the clinical standard to remain practitioners in the facility. Support practitioners should continue to advocate against this change, as explored in the NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1 Nongovernmental Agencies Involved.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022). 4. How do we implement best practices in our organization? (continued). How do we implement best practices in our organization? Retrieved October 30, 2022, from HYPERLINK https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/resource/pressureulcer/tool/pu4a.html
American Medical Association. (n.d.). Code of medical ethics overview. Ethics. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from HYPERLINK https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/code-medical-ethics-overview
Capella University. (2022). Assessment 1 Instructions: Political Landscape Analysis. Retrieved October 25, 2022, from https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?courseid=3821051&contentid=117449571
Huynh, A. P., & Haddad, L. M. (2022). Nursing Practice Act. http://europepmc.org/books/NBK559012
Wiesen, K. (2022). Nurse practitioner scope of practice by state – 2022. Retrieved October 29, 2022, from HYPERLINK ” https://www.nursingprocess.org/nurse-practitioner-scope-of- practice-by-state.html
Yazdanshenas, M., & Mirzaei, M. (2022). Leadership integrity and employees’ success: Role of ethical leadership, psychological capital, and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-05-2022-0117