NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD
NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4
Course Evaluation Template
Student name
Capella University
NURS-FPX6116 Nursing Education Assessment and Evaluation
Professor Name
Submission Date
Course Evaluation Template
A course review involves the student, instructor and the stakeholders concerned to assess various elements of the course content, instructional effectiveness, achievement of learning objectives, and the extent to which it ultimately made a difference. Course evaluations are significant in academic programs since they offer essential information that is continuously utilized to enhance the courses and to enhance the curriculum (Constantinou & Meijer, 2022).
They help students and faculty to delineate the strong aspect and a weak part and ensure that the general track is not lost; that the direction is on a current, well-founded, and close to industry standard. The assessments that are undertaken in the Master of Science in Nursing (MSN)-Nurse Educator program allow the application of the best practice, clinical preparedness, and improvement of teaching techniques to support the health needs.
In order to keep the rigor and efficacy in provision of the theoretical knowledge and the practical competency in wound assessment, treatment and prevention, it is significant to assess the curriculum on the course of the Advanced Wound Care Management Education, specifically designed to prepare the nurse educator with the advanced knowledge and instructional techniques necessary to handle the advanced wound care.
Evaluation of the course is done to assess the experience of students in the course and how the instructional methods and clinical experience in the course measure against, and affect, student learning outcomes and the availability and consistency of the choice of resources used in the course and their consistency with evidence-based practices in wound care management. To do this, one of the main assessment instruments will be a structured questionnaire in the format of 5-point Likert scale presented in Table 01. Questionnaire A questionnaire is a tool where pre-designed questions are asked with the aim of getting valuable information of the participants regarding the effectiveness of the course and learning experience (Mios et al., 2021).
Table 01
Likert Scale
Strongly disagree | 1 |
Disagree | 2 |
Neutral | 3 |
Agree | 4 |
Strongly agree | 5 |
You are required to take part in the questionnaire in Table 2 of the Advanced Wound Care Management Education course. Such feedback is finalized in evaluating what you have gone through and how you have viewed the course to ensure that we know what we have to improve to get the course relevant and effective. The considered and honest answers that you provide will directly lead to better nursing education and ensuring that the course is more responsive to the requirements of nurse educators like you.
Table 02
Course Evaluation Questionnaire
Course Title: Advanced Wound Care Management Education |
Faculty Name: |
Date: |
Instructions: Read each statement carefully and choose the response that best represents your experience. |
Rate each statement using the provided Likert scale (1-5), where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. |
Your response will stay anonymous and the data will be used by the course staff only for improving the course. |
If you want some additional comments, you can enter some at the end. |
No# | Category | Question Statement | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
01 | Teamwork | Such coordination and collaboration between the participants were promoted by completing course assignments and collaborative activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teamwork opportunities were encouraged and a culture where open discussion and knowledge sharing were encouraged was the order of the day. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
The teacher was also able to facilitate group discussion and solve any group work related challenges. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
02 | Communication | The training materials and learning resources were organized in a very coherent way and were useful in outlining complicated ideas of wound management. |
|
|
|
|
|
The course has improved verbal and written communication skills that are required in the management of advanced wound care. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
The instructor provided meaningful feedback and they facilitated discussions and presentations. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
03 | Psychomotor | Hands on training and simulation exercises to acquire practical wound care skills took place. |
|
|
|
|
|
The instructor gave hands-on wound care techniques and gave positive feedback on these. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
The course allowed self-assessment, reflection and personal skill assessment in wound management. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
04 | Cognitive development | The course spearheaded evidence-based and critical decision making in wound care management. |
|
|
|
|
|
The instructor included case studies and problem-solving as a way of strengthening the knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
The course aroused intellectual interest and facilitated lifelong learning in further education in wound care. |
|
|
|
|
| ||
05 | Learning Objectives and Outcomes | The assessment of the course provided a true measure of my knowledge and skills in the implementation of wound care principles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The course was a chance to review and assess my goal attainment with respect to learning objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The learning outcomes of the course and activities were quite appropriate in the context of advanced wound care education. |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Summary
Nursing education also produces significance in the course evaluation of the MSN- Nurse Educator program. A standardized course evaluation template offers a framework to the evaluation of the Advanced Wound Care Management Education course that will lead to the course achieving its stated purposes. The evaluation framework is the key to receiving effective feedback, enhancing the weakness of the system, and advancing the quality of the provided education to nurse educators (Harrison et al., 2020).
The course evaluation involves a methodical reflection of the various elements of the course including the effectiveness of the instruction, the use of resources and the attainment of the learning objectives, all of which yield better results in developing the advanced wound care education in order to achieve better patient outcomes.
The course on Advanced Wound Care Management Education is created to address the mentioned learning goals and the fact that the overall MSN program outcomes are achieved. The evaluation process will equip the pupils with the required cognitive, psychomotor and affective knowledge and so they will be in a position to exercise wound care management. The assessment provides information about the development of competence, i.e. in the domains of clinical preparedness, the use of evidence-based practice, and communication skills in students (Hallé et al., 2021).
Lastly is the ongoing process of evaluation in which faculty may review the findings of the evaluation in order to improve the content and change the instructional methods in order to bridge any gaps in knowledge or abilities. Considering an example, the use of questions that challenge students to apply the theoretical knowledge to work in the practice of wound care situations implies that the course can promote the development of critical thinking and decision-making skills that will be needed by nursing educators (Abdulmohdi and Mcvicar, 2022).
The domain selection criteria, as applied to assessing the impact of the course, are the course content, faculty effectiveness, resource availability and assessment strategies. Wound care assessment based on evidence can be made part of the curriculum to enhance the practical skills of students required to be used in practice and also in educating. Designing feedback processes in ways that enhance the learning process should be valued in nursing education, and best practice would imply the same. Questions related to collaboration and communication are also part of the evaluation as collaborative learning is a valuable element of nursing education (Allert et al., 2021). Moreover, in case faculty effectiveness is measured as well, then faculty will guarantee that they provide the required support, feedback and classroom delivery that will enable student achievement.
The validity and reliability of the course assessment should be to be assured so as to obtain precise and useful feedback. The assessment helps to demonstrate that it is aligned with intended learning outcomes by relating the evaluation questions to intended learning outcomes and identifying the fact that the assessment is aimed at measuring knowledge and skill acquisition among students. A qualitative format of Likert scale is standardized, which means that it is reliable due to the similarity in data collection and the ability to make valid comparisons between various associates (Real et al., 2024).
Moreover, the test-retest reliability of the evaluation form is enhanced by the fact that the evaluation form is piloted first and thus changes to the evaluation form are made as per the evaluation response as a result of pilot testing to the evaluation form. In addition, similar patterns observed and recorded across a variety of course offerings will be studied across a period of time, to determine trends in evaluation outcomes which will play a role in the ongoing course improvement.
To sustain high standards of nursing education under the MSN program- Nurse Educator, there must be a structured course assessment of the Advanced Wound Care Management Education. The assessment is founded on the learning outcomes scores and course materials and faculty performance to improve constantly. This makes it valid and reliable to ensure that the evidence-based refinements are meaningful on its feedback. Assessment helps nurse educators to be ready to the changes that improve the results of patient care.
Save time and excel! Download the expert-written NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 5 sample today and achieve guaranteed success.
Instructions to write NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4
If you need guidance to complete NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4 Course Evaluation Template, contact our expert tutors for instant help and support!
Instructions File For 6116 Assessment 4
Assessment 2
Course Definition and Alignment Table
Instructions
Choose an existing Nursing Program (Academic or Professional Development) and briefly describe it.
List the Program Learning Outcomes for the entire program.
Develop a new course or module to add to the program.
Construct a 1-2 page course definition for the new course to add to this program that includes the length, purpose, audience, credit, location, and rationale for adding the course.
Develop course learning objectives for this new addition.
Complete a table that links the course objectives to the program outcomes, and include examples of assessments for the course. Link the course objectives to any external standards or regulatory guidelines related to the justification of the course.
Introduction
Assessing and evaluating program effectiveness requires you to understand the entire alignment of a course, from the way it is presented to potential learners to the final analysis of aggregated data.
While there are many similarities in the development of curricula for Academic versus Professional Development, there are also many differences.
In Academia, the curriculum is guided by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing and either the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) or Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) accreditation, or the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. As part of the accreditation process, the guidelines are clearly stated and the connection between the curriculum and standards is easy to process according to the level of the program.
In Professional Development, there are several different processes although the concepts are the same. Professional Development courses and curricula fall under the categories of Orientation (including Nurse Residency Programs or Preceptor Development), Competency Management and Inservice (to assess skill competencies and the use of new equipment), and Continuing Education (or Professional Development Credits). Regulatory and Accreditation standards must be met, with some examples being The Joint Commission, State Board of Nursing, Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN), and State and National laws.
In both Professional Development and Academia, the three domains of learning must be addressed in the curriculum assessment and evaluation (Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective). While each assessment may not involve all three domains, it is important they are addressed elsewhere in the course.
Whenever you begin the process of designing a course, it is important to begin with the end in mind. Assessment and evaluation strategies are key elements of the design process.
How will the course fit in with a larger organizational outcome or continuing educational requirement?
What do you want your learners to know or do after they have completed the course?
How will you determine whether your learners have met your learning objectives?
Program outcomes and learning objectives create a framework to help you determine the learning activities and the types of assessment that will best tell you whether your objective has been met.
Reminder: You should log 12.5 practicum hours between your preparation and completion of this assessment. Review the example in the course overview for an example of how you could document and log these hours.
Preparation
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
What is the difference between assessment and evaluation?
What are the differences between formative and summative evaluations?
How would you address each of the following domains when designing assessments and evaluations of learner skills and knowledge?
Cognitive.
Psychomotor.
Affective.
To learn more about APA style and formatting and to view a sample paper in APA format, go to the Capella Writing Center’s Evidence and APA page.
Scenario
Imagine that you are a nurse educator in a local organization. You have been asked to create a new course for your nurse education program. You have been given latitude to select both the topic and the learner population. The organization can be a college or university, or a hospital or clinic.
Your supervisor would like you to create a course definition document that includes the following elements:
A course title and course description that includes the length, any credit offered, and if the course setting is didactic, lab, or clinical.
The student learning objectives for the course.
The related program description and program outcomes.
Alignment of the assessment plans with the appropriate domains of learning.
Describe the assessment plan and the alignment of the external standards or regulatory guidelines that pertain to the course offering or course objectives. The assessment and evaluation of the course should demonstrate that course learning objectives and program outcomes are met. The external national nursing standards will demonstrate that the course is evidence-based.
This year, the department is asking all nurse educators to map new courses to assessment strategies and learning domains.
In addition, leadership has recognized the importance of evidence-based practice and standards of care. To that end, at least one external national nursing standard should be aligned with the objectives for your assessment. Some examples you could choose from are the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials, Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN) competencies, or the Standards and Guidelines from any appropriate professional nursing specialty organizations.
Course Definition and Alignment Table
Identify a specific healthcare issue, setting, and learner audience.
Start by giving your organization a brief summary of the following:
A description of the program offering (including the educational setting).
The program outcomes.
Next, your course definition should consist of the following:
Course description, vision, and rationale.
The course learning objectives.
The evaluation and assessment strategies, including examples of assessment and evaluation tasks.
Use a table to show the alignment of assessment and evaluation strategies. Include the following in your table:
Alignment of learning objectives to program outcomes.
Alignment of learning objectives to assessment strategies and domains of learning.
Alignment of program outcomes to external standards.
You may (but are not required to) use the Course Definition and Alignment Table Template [DOCX] (https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38125/files/64970937wrap=1) (https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38125/files/6497093/download?download_frd=1). You are also welcome to review the Sample Course Definition and Alignment Table [PDF] (https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38125/files/64970927wrap=1) (https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38125/files/6497092/download?download_frd=1) to see an example of a completed template.
Additional Requirements
Follow the formatting and style guidelines in Evidence and APA. In addition, your assessment should meet the following requirements:
APA format: Use correct APA style and formatting for the rationale, paying particular attention to citations and references.
References: Include at least three peer-reviewed scholarly resources from the last 5 years.
Length:
Course definition: 1–3 pages (not including cover page and reference list).
Alignment table: No page limit.
Font and font size: Any approved APA fonts, 12 point.
Compile your course definition and alignment table into one document before submitting. We highly recommend saving your document in Landscape, rather than Portrait, so your tables fit properly.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Apply principles of assessment and evaluation for use in nursing education programs.
Construct a course description that clearly supports the educational program outcomes.
Align course learning objectives to existing program outcomes.
Describe assessment and evaluation strategies used in a nursing education course, including the appropriate domains of learning.
Competency 4: Evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes.
Align appropriate professional standards and/or regulations to learning objectives in a nursing education course.
Competency 6: Communicate as a practitioner-scholar, consistent with the expectations for a health care professional.
Convey purpose of the assessment in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence using APA style citations and references, and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Scoring Guide for 6116 Assessment 4
Scoring Guide for 6116 Assessment 4 will be added soon.
References For NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4
Abdulmohdi, N., & Mcvicar, A. (2022). Investigating the clinical decision‐making of nursing students using high‐fidelity simulation, observation and think aloud: A mixed methods research study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(2), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15507
Allert, C., Dellkvist, H., Hjelm, M., & Andersson, E. K. (2021). Nursing students’ experiences of applying problem‐based learning to train the core competence teamwork and collaboration: An interview study. Nursing Open, 9(1), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1098
Constantinou, C., & Meijer, W. M. (2022). Student evaluations of teaching and the development of a comprehensive measure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools. BioMed Central Medical Education, 22(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03148-6
Hallé, M.-C., Bussières, A., Pasin, A. L., Storr, C., Mak, S., Root, K., & Thomas, A. (2021). Building evidence-based practice competencies among rehabilitation students: a qualitative exploration of faculty and preceptors’ perspectives. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26, 1311–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10051-0
Harrison, R., Meyer, L., Rawstorne, P., Razee, H., Chitkara, U., Mears, S., & Balasooriya, C. (2020). Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: A meta- review. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1730315
Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2021). Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206
Real, C. A., Ribeiro, R., Almiro, P. A., & Nunes, T. (2024). Digital orofacial identification technologies in real-world scenarios. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5892. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135892
Best Professors To Choose From For 6116 Class
- Lisa Kreeger.
- Buddy Wiltcher.
- Titilola “Titi” Balogun.
- Susan Nohelty.
- Linda Matheson.
(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 6116 Assessment 4
Question 1: Where can I download a free sample for NURS-FPX 6116 Assessment 4?
Answer 1: You can download a free sample for this assessment from the Tutors Academy website.
Question 2: Where can I find the rubrics and instruction file for NURS-FPX 6116 Assessment 4?
Answer 2: You can find the rubrics and instruction file for this assessment on the Tutors Academy sample page for NURS-FPX 6116 Assessment 4.
Question 3: What is NURS-FPX 6116 Assessment 4?
Answer 3: NURS-FPX 6116 Assessment 4 evaluates the effectiveness and learning outcomes of the Advanced Wound Care Management course.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery

