NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD
NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2
Global Issue Investigation
Student name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 8024
Professor Name
Submission Date
Global Issue Investigation
Maternal mortality is still one of the most prominent global health challenges that needs immediate attention. An estimated 260,000 women died during pregnancy and childbirth in 2023, a 40% decrease in the global maternal mortality ratio between 2000 and 2023 (from 328 to 197 deaths per 100,000 live births; World Health Organization, 2025; UNICEF, 2025). Sub-Saharan Africa carries the highest burden (approximately 70% of the global burden of maternal mortality), followed by southern Asia (17% of the global burden of maternal mortality, World Health Organization, 2025). There is a huge gap economically between low income countries and high income countries, for example, low income countries have 346 deaths per 100,000 live births while high income countries have 10 per 100,000 live births (World Health Organization, 2025). The preventable deaths are individual tragedies, as well as significant barriers to global development and health justice.
Description of the Problem
Global Prevalence and Scope
Maternal mortality is still one of the biggest health problems in the world. An estimated 260,000 women lost their lives to complications of pregnancy and childbirth in 2023, every two minutes of the year (UNICEF, 2025; World Health Organization, 2025). Overall, the MMR declined by 40 percent from 328 to 197 deaths per 100,000 live births between 2000 and 2023 (United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2025; The World Bank, 2025). According to the World Health Organization (2025), in 2023, more than 700 women died every day from preventable complications from pregnancy, with 92 per cent of the deaths occurring in low and lower-middle-income countries. The current global maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 197 per 100,000 live births is almost three times the Sustainable Development Goals target of 70 per 100,000 (UNICEF 2025; World Bank 2025). The deaths represent catastrophic losses that require a coordinated international response now.
Disproportionately Affected Nations
Cross-country geographical differences in maternal mortality reflect deep inequalities across regions. Sub-Saharan Africa alone is estimated to account for 70% of the global burden of maternal deaths (182,000), followed by southern Asia (17% or 43,000) of the global burden (World Health Organization, 2025). In 2023, there were 3 maternal deaths for every 100,000 births in Australia and New Zealand compared with 100 maternal deaths for every 100,000 births in the sub-Saharan African region (UNICEF 2025). The countries with the highest MMR are Chad and the Central African Republic (1 in 24 lifetime risk), Nigeria (1 in 25), Somalia (1 in 30), and Afghanistan (1 in 40) (World Health Organization, 2025). Thirty-seven countries that are in conflict or have institutional fragility were responsible for 61% of global maternal deaths and only for 25% of live births (WHO 2025). “The subregional differences highlight the important need for targeted interventions in the places most at risk.”
Regional Inequities
Socioeconomic and emigration-related factors further aggravate maternal mortality. Despite this dramatic difference between the two classifications, there remain important economic differences, with maternal deaths per 100,000 live births standing at 346 in resource-poor countries versus 10 in high-income countries (World Health Organization, 2025). Globally, the risk of mortality in sub-Saharan Africa is 1 in 55 for women (nearly a quarter million times higher than 1 in 14,000 in Western Europe, according to the World Health Organization, 2025). In particular, the MMR in conflict-affected settings is significantly higher than in fragile (368) and tranquil (99) (World Health Organization, 2025) settings (504 deaths per 100,000 live births). Women in resource-poor countries are at greater risk of maternal death compared to women in high-income countries (1 in 66 lifetime risk vs. 1 in 8000, respectively; UNICEF 2025). Striking inequality sheds light on the connections between poverty, war, and maternal health across global populations.
Social Determinants That Impact the Problem
Population Most Affected and Socioeconomic Determinants
Social determinants are complex obstacles that disproportionately affect sensitive populations. Mothers who are low socioeconomic, especially in rural areas with low education, have the highest risk of maternal mortality (Amjad et al., 2021). Cumulative disadvantage across the lifespan is caused by social factors such as poverty, level of education, racism, and gender inequality (Hossain & Zahid, 2025). Evidence shows that maternal education, husband’s education, caste/ethnicity, and economic status have a significant impact on maternal health service utilisation and outcomes (Omer et al. 2021). Structural racism impacts access to quality health care, education, income, employment, and safe housing, which leads to continued health disparities.
Cultural Beliefs and Geographic Factors
Traditional practices and geographical factors are important determinants of maternal health experiences and outcomes. Rodriguez & Bae (2024) found that early age at first union, preference for a traditional birth attendant, and dietary restrictions in pregnancy are important determinants of maternal health outcomes. Superstition and herbal medicine are more likely to lead to a delay in medical treatment (Barnish et al., 2021). Geographic location and culture are barriers to professional birth care and emergency obstetric care (Rodriguez & Bae, 2024). Social norms related to masculine control over decision-making processes and restricted individual freedom for females have direct implications on health-seeking behaviors during pregnancy and delivery.
Political Systems and Healthcare Access
The relationship between voice accountability mechanisms and governance generally is negative, indicating that good governance is associated with reduced maternal deaths. George (2024) concludes that left-of-center political traditions and the generosity of the welfare state have positive effects on maternal health via progressive social policies. Weak governance environments, political instability, and conflict settings are key barriers to maternal health progress and service delivery (Bogale et al, 2024). We find that countries with high ethnic fragmentation can lose the health benefits of democratization and economic growth due to elite capture and discriminatory policies.
Nongovernment Organization (NGO) Involvement
Partners In Health (PIH): Rural Women in Post-Conflict Settings
NGO organisational interventions provide evidence that targeted programming can lead to major reductions in maternal mortality. Partners In Health works with rural women in Kono District of post-conflict Sierra Leone, where the lifetime risk for maternal death is 1 in 74 compared with 1 in 4,161 in the United States (Partners in Health, 2025a; Lassi et al., 2020). The PIH is implementing the maternal center of excellence intervention, which includes comprehensive emergency obstetric care, with 24-hour electricity, functional blood banks, surgical capacity, and maternal waiting homes (Partners in Health, 2025b). However, evidence from Partners in Health shows that the intervention was very effective in terms of facility delivery improving from 2020 to 2022 and maternal deaths decreasing over the same period (Partners in Health, 2025b). The importance of such large infrastructure investments cannot be overestimated if sustainable maternal health improvements are to be achieved in resource-constrained environments.
Save the Children – Community-Level Maternal and Child Health
Community-based interventions are scalable approaches to maternal health in underserved populations. Save the Children is an international development organisation that works directly with vulnerable families and communities in developing countries, including communities with high maternal and neonatal mortality (Save the Children, 2025). The organization runs community-based intervention packages through trained community health workers who deliver evidence-based maternal and newborn care interventions for target populations. The interventions are highly effective, and there is evidence that scaling up to population coverage can help reduce maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, and stillbirths (Nove et al., 2020). Save the Children (2025) reaches an estimated 28.1 million children and women each year through health and nutrition programs. The community-based models illustrate the promise of population-level change through locally implemented interventions.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) – Emergency Obstetric Care in Crisis Settings
The MSF addresses the needs of pregnant women in conflict areas, in refugee camps, and in humanitarian emergency situations where health systems are collapsed or inadequate. The organization has referral systems for ambulance, emergency obstetric intervention 24 hours a day, management of caesarean section, blood transfusion, and complications (Médecins Sans Frontières, 2021). The intervention is very effective for the reduction of maternal mortality in the Kabezi area of Burundi and the Bo district in Sierra Leone (Médecins Sans Frontières, 2021). The emergency obstetric care interventions demonstrate that high-quality obstetric care in an emergency setting can significantly reduce maternal mortality even in the most difficult situations.
Culturally Sensitive Intervention
An Indigenous doula program is a culturally appropriate intervention that can provide Indigenous and marginalized women with traditional birthing knowledge and modern medical practices. The intervention would be delivered through community-based training programmes that recruit doulas from target communities and teach them about traditional birthing practices (Khaw et al., 2022) in culturally specific ways. There is evidence that the intervention is effective in improving maternal outcomes by reducing the rate of cesarean section and increasing the rate of successful breastfeeding, particularly in Black and Indigenous people who report experiencing systemic discrimination in health care (Martin et al., 2022). The intervention is culturally sensitive as it acknowledges Indigenous sovereignty over birthing practices, addresses historical trauma resulting from the colonization of childbirth, and reinforces cultural practices that enhance families and communities.
Conclusion
Maternal mortality remains a significant global health crisis that affects women in low- and middle-income countries in particular, in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Social factors (poverty, education, cultural norms, government instability, etc.) are the systemic barriers that reinforce the health inequities. Evidence suggests that targeted interventions by organizations, such as Partners in Health, Save the Children, and Médecins Sans Frontières, can achieve dramatic reductions in maternal mortality through emergency obstetric care, community health worker programs, and ambulance referral systems. However, responding to the emergency requires culturally appropriate strategies such as Indigenous doula programs that respect traditional birthing practices while integrating modern health care practices. In conclusion, the reduction of maternal mortality is a multifaceted issue that requires a holistic approach to address not only the immediate medical needs but also structural determinants that can ensure equitable access to high-quality and dignified care during pregnancy and childbirth.
Get complete guidance for NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 3 at Tutors Academy. Start your preparation today!
Instructions To Write NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2
If you need instructions to write NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2 Global Issue Investigation, contact us at Tutors Academy. Our expert tutors will help you.
Instruction file for 8024 Assessment 2
Assessment 2
Global Issue Investigation
| Instructions | Resources | Activity | Attempt 1 | Attempt 2 | Attempt 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For this assessment you will complete an 6–8 page evidence-based analysis of your chosen global health issue within your chosen country of context. |
Introduction
For the DNP leader, assessing a community and empowering its members to lead and facilitate change are key components of promoting equitable health care across the globe. In this assessment, you will explore your chosen global health issue, including social determinants, NGO involvement, and culturally sensitive interventions. You will also be reflecting on how global health issues are really human issues that transcend national boundaries.
Changing or improving a community’s health means engaging and involving community members and stakeholders in the business of change. It means organizing and empowering the vulnerable and disenfranchised as partners in change. It means entering the community with an appreciative and inquisitive attitude and building on existing capacities and paradigms. That work starts with a thorough look into both the health issue and the people in your area affected by it.
Assessment Summary
This assessment is an opportunity for you to report a thoughtful analysis of your selected public health problem. Make sure to choose a health problem or issue present in the region assigned for this course section.
Important: The assessments in this course build on one another and will culminate in a final literature review. Keep this in mind as you prepare for this assessment.
Preparation
In preparation for this assessment, you may wish to look at:
Review the Assessment 1 Resource activity: Goals and Public Health Problems.
Look at the materials in this study to help prepare you for this assessment.
Assessment 1: Why Is Global Health Important (✔)
Note: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented: subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your faculty’s feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely without considering and integrating your faculty’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.
For FlexPath learners, if you choose to make revisions based on feedback from a previous attempt, you should highlight your revisions in vision. For example, if you made revisions from attempt one and would like the faculty to review the content when grading attempt two, the content needs to be highlighted. Therefore, the faculty reviews only the content highlighted on attempts two and three. If the entire paper is highlighted, the paper will be returned ungraded and will count as an attempt. Track changes are not a substitution for highlighted text.
Assessment Instructions
Before you get started, please watch the following video:
NURS-FPX8024 Assessment 2 Video (✔).
For this assessment, you will choose one global health issue and write a 6–8 page analysis paper of your selected health issue and its relevant data, using current APA style and formatting. Make sure you address the following the rubric criteria in your analysis of a health issue with global implications:
Description of the Problem: Analyze an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations.
As you address the following questions, be sure to use epidemiological data (this could be Gapminder).
How menadian is the problem?
What is the scope of the problem?
What nations or people are affected?
Which countries are disproportionately affected?
What inequities exist across countries?
Social Determinants That Impact the Problem: Analyze data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue.
Because this section is a data analysis, be sure that data supports your arguments here. This is another opportunity to include Gapminder data, but you may also want to draw from other sources.
How would you describe the population most affected?
What are the social determinants that affect this problem?
How do cultural beliefs affect the health problem?
How do geographical elements affect the health problem? How does socioeconomic status affect the health problem? How do political systems affect the health problem?
Nongovernment Funding Organization Involvement: Assess the efficacy of a system’s capability to serve a target sub-population’s healthcare needs and the function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations by identifying three NGOs worldwide that are targeting the health issue you have chosen. Write a paragraph for each of the three NGOs where you describe the following.
Define the sub-population for the NGO. This could be based on demographics (age, gender, ethnicity), geographic location, health conditions, or other relevant criteria.
Describe one intervention or policy that each of three NGO is implementing to address the specific health issue. The intervention you choose should be different for each NGO. Therefore, you will describe three different interventions.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Culturally Sensitive Intervention: Propose one culturally sensitive intervention not previously mentioned in this paper to address the health issue chosen. If this intervention is from literature, ensure citations are provided. Describe the intervention and briefly how the intervention could be implemented. Why is your proposed intervention culturally sensitive?
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: Your report should be 6–8 pages in length, excluding the title page, references page, and appendix.
References: APA formatted citations and references for a minimum of 10 scholarly references, no more than five years old.
APA format: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCKS] to help you in writing and formatting your plan. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page.
An abstract and running head are not required.
Appropriate section headings.
Additional Information: In addition to an introduction with a thesis statement and a conclusion paragraph, use the following section headings to format the body of your paper to ensure thorough content coverage and flow.
Description of the Problem.
Social Determinants That Impact the Problem.
Nongovernment Funding Organization Involvement.
Culturally Sensitive Intervention.
Nomenclature: Please save the document you are submitting for grading using the following format.
Last Name, First Name – Assessment 2.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Evaluate global health by using established or evolving methods to determine population focused priorities for care.
Analyze an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations supported by epidemiological data.
Analyze data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue.
Competency 2: Propose culturally sensitive interventions to address health problems.
Propose one culturally sensitive intervention not previously mentioned in the paper that demonstrates a clear understanding of cultural considerations related to the target population and chosen health issue.
Competency 3: Assess the efficacy of a systems capability to serve a target sub populations healthcare needs and the function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations.
Assess the efficacy of a systems capability to serve a target sub-populations healthcare needs and the function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations by identifying three NGOs worldwide that are targeting the health issue you have chosen.
Competency 5: Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations, incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.
Apply level headings and length of report requirements.
Reference page contains a minimum of 10 resources.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Scoring Guide for 8024 Assessment 2
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Criterion 1
Apply level headings and length of report requirements.
Distinguished
Proficient
Used the following required headings: – Description of the Problem. – Social Determinants that Impact the Problem. – Funding Organization Involvement – Culturally Sensitive Intervention Report is 6–8 pages in length, excluding title page, references page, and appendix.
Basic
N/A
Non Performance
Does not use required headings or body of paper exceeds five eight page maximum. Return assignment without grading – “Wrong Assignment attached.”
Criterion 2
Reference page contains a minimum of 10 resources.
Distinguished
N/A
Proficient
Reference page contains a minimum of 10 resources.
Basic
N/A
Non Performance
Reference page contains a minimum of 10 references. Return assignment without grading – “Wrong Assignment attached.”
Criterion 3
Analyze an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations supported by epidemiological data.
Distinguished
Analyzes with critical thinking and depth of understanding an international health issue with supporting epidemiological data noting its effect on individuals, communities, and populations.
Proficient
Analyzes an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations supported by epidemiological data.
Basic
Identifies but does not analyze an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations.
Non Performance
Does not identify an international health issue in regard to its effect on individuals, communities, and populations.
Criterion 4
Analyze data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue.
Distinguished
Provides an exceptional analysis offering insights beyond surface-level observations on the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue with examples of supporting data.
Proficient
Analyzes data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue.
Basic
Analyses data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences but does not make clear connection to effect on specified global health issue.
Non Performance
Does not analyze data regarding the socioeconomic, political, and cultural influences that affect the global health issue.
Criterion 5
Assess the efficacy of a system’s capability to serve a target sub-populations healthcare needs and the function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations by identifying three NGOs worldwide that are targeting the health issue you have chosen.
Distinguished
Conducts an exceptional evaluation of the effectiveness of three NGO interventions, and provides comprehensive evidence to assess impact for a specific defined sub-population.
Proficient
Assesses the efficacy of a system’s capability to serve a target sub-populations healthcare needs and the function of public health nongovernmental funding organizations by identifying three NGOs worldwide that are targeting the health issue you have chosen.
Basic
Describes three NGOs, the sub-populations they serve, and how they are targeting the chosen health issue.
Non Performance
Does not discuss the efficiency of three separate NGOs.
Criterion 6
Propose one culturally sensitive intervention not previously mentioned in the paper that demonstrates a clear understanding of cultural considerations related to the target population and chosen health issue.
Distinguished
Develops an educational resource or project proposal focused on driving evidence-based improvements related to chosen health issue. Notes relevant assumptions that were made during the development.
Proficient
Proposes one culturally sensitive intervention not previously mentioned in the paper that demonstrates a clear understanding of cultural considerations related to the target population and chosen health issue.
Basic
Proposes a culturally sensitive intervention, but the description lacks depth or specificity.
Non Performance
Does not describe why the proposed intervention is culturally sensitive.
Criterion 7
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Distinguished
Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting a strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting.
Proficient
Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references with less than 10% error in selected citations and references.
Basic
Applies some APA formatting to in-text citations and references, but there are errors or inconsistencies that need to be corrected.
Non Performance
Does not apply APA formatting, or the errors are severe and affect the readability and credibility of scholarly writing.
Criterion 8
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Distinguished
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
Proficient
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Basic
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.
Non Performance
Does not convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style. Does not incorporate supporting evidence nor adhere to organizational, professional, or scholarly writing standards.
References NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2
Amjad, S., Adesunkanmi, M., Twynstra, J., Seabrook, J. A., & Ospina, M. B. (2021). Social Determinants of Health and Adverse Outcomes in Adolescent Pregnancies. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735847
Barnish, M. S., Tan, S. Y., Taeihagh, A., Tørnes, M., Horne, R. V. H. N., & Torres, G. J. M. (2021). Linking political exposures to child and maternal health outcomes: A realist review. BioMed Central Public Health, 21(1), e127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10176-2
Bogale, B., Scambler, S., Khairuddin, A. N. M., & Gallagher, J. E. (2024). Health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states: A review of systematic reviews. Public Library of Science One, 19(6), e0305234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305234
George, A. X. (2024). Motherhood, medicine, and magazines in interwar Vienna: The case of die mutter (The mother, 1924–1926). Medical Humanities, 50(2), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012866
Hossain, A., & Zahid, M. (2025). Cultural beliefs and maternal health practices in rural Bangladesh: A phenomenological study. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7281727/v1
Khaw, S. M.-L., Zahroh, R. I., O’Rourke, K., Dearnley, R. E., Homer, C., & Bohren, M. A. (2022). Community-based doulas for migrant and refugee women: A mixed-method systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Medical Journal Global Health, 7(7), e009098. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009098
Lassi, Z. S., Kumar, R., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2020). Community-based care to improve maternal, newborn, and child health. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (2): Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, 2, 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0348-2_ch14
Martin, M. C., Keith, M., Olmedo, S., Edwards, D., Barrientes, A., Pan, A., & Valeggia, C. (2022). Cesarean section and breastfeeding outcomes in an indigenous Qom community with high breastfeeding support. Evolution, Medicine & Public Health, 10(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoab045
Médecins Sans Frontières. (2021). Burundi and Sierra Leone: Access to emergency care significantly reduces maternal mortality | MSF. Msf.org. https://www.msf.org/burundi-and-sierra-leone-access-emergency-care-significantly-reduces-maternal-mortality
Nove, A., Friberg, I. K., Bernis, L. de, McConville, F., Moran, A. C., Najjemba, M., Bender, P. ten, Tracy, S., & Homer, C. S. E. (2020). Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: A lives saved tool modelling study. The Lancet Global Health, 9(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30397-1
Omer, S., Zakar, R., Zakar, M. Z., & Fischer, F. (2021). The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal mortality: A qualitative study from South Punjab, Pakistan. Reproductive Health, 18(1), e97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01151-6
Partners In Health. (2025a). Maternal health. PIH.org https://www.pih.org/programs/womens-health
Partners In Health. (2025b). Preventing maternal and child death in rural Sierra Leone. PIH.org. https://www.pih.org/article/preventing-maternal-and-child-death-rural-sierra-leone
Rodriguez, J. M., & Bae, B. (2024). Political ideology, direction of policy agendas, and maternal mortality outcomes in the U.S., 1915–2007. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 28(5), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03859-2
Save the Children. (2025). Global health. Savethechildren.org. https://www.savethechildren.org/us/what-we-do/health/global-health-programs
UNICEF. (2025, April). Maternal mortality. UNICEF data: Monitoring the situation of children and women. Unicef.org. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/
World Bank. (2025). Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT
World Health Organization. (2025, April 7). Maternal mortality. Who.int. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
Best Professors To Choose From For 8024 Class
- Lisa Kreeger, PhD, RN.
- Buddy (Buddy) Wiltcher, EdD, MSN, APRN.
- Jen (Jennifer) Green, DNP
- Julia Bronner, PhD
- Linda Matheson, PhD
(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 8024 Assessment 2
Question 1: From where can I download a free sample for NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2?
Answer 1: You can download a free sample for NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2 from the Tutors Academy website.
Question 2: Where can I find the instructions and rubric file for NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2?
Answer 2: You can find the rubric and instruction files for this assessment on the Tutors Academy sample page for NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2.
Question 3: What is NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2?
Answer 3: NURS-FPX 8024 Assessment 2 is a comprehensive analysis of a significant global health issue, focusing on its causes, impact, and evidence-based interventions.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery

