NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3 Developing a PICO(T)

NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD

NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3

Developing a PICO(T)

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX4025 Research and Evidence-Based Decision Making

Professor Name

Submission Date

Developing a PICO(T)

A Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time (PICOT) question is a significant area of clinical research and especially when handling cases of diabetic ketoacidosis, where critical cases are involved. It is an evaluation of the performance of patients treated with the help of trained nurses as compared to that of patients in normal care in terms of closure of the anion gap in a period of twenty-four hours (Hamdy, 2024). The PICOT time can be used to demonstrate the outcome of the education that will lead to faster stabilization and better treatment. Its findings can support the introduction of new hospital operations and patient recovery.

PICO (T) Framework to Explore the Issue

Diabetic ketoacidosis is a condition in which the body contains extremely low insulin, and, therefore, ketones are in the blood. Unless addressed promptly, this condition may lead to the development of such severe complications as swelling of the brain, damage to the kidneys, irregularities in the pace of heartbeats, or even death (CDC, 2024). The individuals who reside in underserved localities or lack health literacy are also especially vulnerable because, in many cases, they may not have access to diagnosis and proper care (Shubrook et 2023). The minority patients would also have a greater likelihood of experiencing communication barriers or even discrimination within the care setting, resulting in treatment delays and leading to a worse outcome, such as an extended hospital stay or an increased intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (CDC, 2024). These contrasts show that the standardization of nursing education is needed to enhance the chances of timely diagnosing and treating DKA appropriately. The organized training of nurses regarding DKA recognition and protocol-driven treatment can initiate the earlier metabolic recovery, thus reducing the time of anion gap restoration during the initial 24 hours, and the general results.

PICO(T) Research Question

In adult inpatients with DKA (P), does structured nursing education on DKA recognition and protocol-driven management (I), as compared to usual care without structured education (C), reduce time to anion gap closure (O) within twenty-four hours of admission (T)?

  • Population (P): Adult inpatients presenting with DKA
  • Intervention (I): Structured nursing education on DKA recognition and protocol-driven management
  • Comparison (C): Usual care without structured education
  • Outcome (O): Reduced time to anion gap closure
  • Timeframe (T): Within twenty-four hours of admission

Benefits of a PICO(T) Approach

This PICOT question is aimed at understanding whether structured nursing interventions in regards to DKA recognition and management can positively impact the inpatient returns in adults. It compares the patient that is being handled by nurses with DKA skills to those that are handled by an average level of care in terms of anion gap closure within 24 hours of hospitalization (Hamdy, 2024). The comparison of this period will help to understand whether education is a contributor to retention and a more successful treatment process. The results apply to hospitals in the optimization of the process, reduction of complications, and more patients with diabetic ketoacidosis recover.

Identification of Sources of Evidence

To extend the applicability of the studies regarding the PICOT question, a grid literature search was conducted to identify scholarly research of quantitative, qualitative, and outcome research in DKA management and nursing education. Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were selected due to their reputations for having evidence-based and peer-reviewed content. The key search terms were diabetic ketoacidosis, adult patients, structured nursing training, DKA protocols, anion gap closure, and outcome of managing them. The search was filtered using the logical operators such as AND and OR, and all studies that satisfied the elements of PICOT were considered. To make the articles accurate and current, the filters were articles that were published within the past five years, peer-reviewed journals, and those available in full-text. Quantitative studies were also determined by the fact that the outcome could be measured in time (to anion gap closure, to the normalization of glucose, and length of hospital stay). The qualitative studies were also investigated to identify perceptions and experiences of nurses who apply structured education on DKA care. Since, as Lazar et al. (2023) found, there was a correlation between anion gap normalization time delay and anion gap indicators of DKA severity, anion gap normalization time (AGNT) can be useful in measuring DKA recovery. The inclusion of outcomes research articles was also to identify the impact of their educational interventions on patient safety, complication rates, and other quality of care. The credibility was also facilitated through the choice of studies that are published by authoritative sources, which included the government health organizations, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and also studies in reputable and peer-reviewed journals as BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing. Such a methodological manner enabled the incorporation of the evidence of various kinds of research that guaranteed a comprehensive explanation of findings connected to DKA.

Rationale

Using the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) model in evaluating evidence for this PICOT question. The CRAAP test is a concept that was developed by Sarah Blakeslee and her colleagues in the library department of the California State University at Chico, and it was designed to evaluate the reliability of sources in different academic disciplines (Kalidas, 2021). The currency is significant because recommendations on how to manage DKA and how to educate nurses are subject to change with the new evidence appearing; the recent publications regarding the topic are useful to implement the latest evidence-based disease management guidelines. Relevance is the period when a study is implemented for adult patients in DKA hospitals, with the results of reduced time to anion gap closure within twenty-four hours, with the help of structured nursing education or conventional care. The authority is reached when evidence is presented by reputable experts in diabetes care and critical care nursing and released in peer-reviewed journals or released by authoritative bodies like the American Diabetes Association. The validity of any given research is verified when the methodology is transparent, reliable outcome measures can be proven, and those are consistent with other sources. Finally, Purpose may be demonstrated when the evidence aims to improve patient outcomes and clinical practices rather than a commercial interest. Through this model, the data to support the favorability of structured nurse management of DKA will be dependable, clinically supported, and patient-specific to stabilize metabolism within less than twenty-four hours of admission.

Relevance of Findings from Evidence

Proper nursing education is more important in the detection and early treatment of DKA, and this can successfully close the anion gap within 24 hours of admission. Organized learning provides nurses with evidence-based and clearly formulated guidelines and skills training to recognize the symptoms of DKA early enough and adhere to instructions in a procedural manner. This approach will ensure consistency in practice by clinicians and reduce error and maximize timely interventions compared to unstructured methods (National Diabetes Services Scheme, 2021). In one peer-reviewed article on nursing and palliative care, Shaker et al. (2025) give valid evidence that structured nursing education on the use of DKA protocols has a tremendous effect on the capability of nurses to conduct accurate assessment and prompt interventions, thereby leading to a faster anion gap closure than normal care. According to the recognized leader of diabetes care, the American Diabetes Association (2023), standardized education is the key to empowerment of nurses, depending upon the possibility to interpret lab values, glucose trending, and timely reaction to the metabolic changes, which is similar to the PICOT question of reducing the time to anion gap closure. According to Jerreat (2020) in the Journal of Nursing Standard, extensive training has a beneficial impact on not only clinical competency but also teamwork and communication in the process of transitioning care to ensure that during the process of handoffs, no essential tasks are left out in the successful provision of care to patients with DKA. These sources have proved that structured nursing education and protocol-driven management are better compared to regular care by being used collectively to prove their credibility and relevance.

Evidence Analysis for DKA PICOT Question

Early identification and protocol-based care with organized nursing education intervention has been established to have a tremendous outcome in adult inpatients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) compared to standard care without organized constructive education. Carrying out a standardized education of nurses on the DKA guidelines, such as the demonstration of symptoms, correct administration of insulin, prompt fluid replacement, monitoring of the level of blood glucose and ketones, will help them to be prepared to render effective care during the first 24 hours of hospitalization. Umpierrez et al. (2024) described that companies that put in place a holistic nursing education into DKA management schemes demonstrated faster anion gap resolution and general metabolic balance as compared to those that stuck to traditional care models. Similarly, Ruiz et al. (2024) observed that, with structured training, nurses will be able to respond instantly to changes in clinical settings, reducing the time-lapses in the critical treatment. The authors noted that DKA education as a measure to eradicate post-surgery ICU hospital admissions minimized ICU transfers, since the nurses could take action in time and prevent complications (Moustafa et al., 2025). In general, it is possible to state that structured education should be integrated in the nursing practice as it reduces the time spent on closing anion gap, as well as improves the coordination of care and safety of adult DKA patients in the hospital.

Assumptions

To give a reasonable evaluation of the importance of structured nursing education in the management of DKA, there were several assumptions were made. It was assumed that all nurses, regardless of the intervention and control groups, worked under similar conditions and had equal opportunities to use medical tools, protocols, and support from the staff members (Ruiz et al., 2024). Further, it was assumed that patients were equal, such as their age, the extent of the DKA, and the general state of health, did not serve as a confounding factor in the results of the educational intervention. Both groups were treated using standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat DKA.

Conclusion

Nurse education on DKA identification and compliance with treatment regimens creates power in nurses to provide feasible care promptly, thus, normalization of blood glucose and ketones in a period of twenty-four hours. Plans have been documented to improve patient outcomes by reducing complications and faster stabilization as compared to the conventional approach of care that lacks systematic education. A consistent practice across unit-wide standard educational programs enhances patient safety. Through evidence-based protocols, the time-to-anion gap metric will be easily brought down by nurses in adult inpatients with DKA.

Need help with NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 4? Get expert guidance and free samples now at Tutors Academy!

Instructions To Write NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3

If you need guidance to write NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3 Developing a PICO(T), contact Tutors Academy. Our expert tutors are ready to help you succeed.

Instruction file for 4025 Assessment 3

Assessment 3 Instructions

Create a 3–5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and analyze the evidence you locate to answer the question.

Introduction

PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

It stands for:

  • P – Patient/population/problem.

  • I – Intervention.

  • C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).

  • O – Outcomes.

  • T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

Reference

Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015). Introduction to nursing research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

Scenario

For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

Instructions

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the Create PICO(T) Questions page) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following:

  • Review the PICO(T) process.

  • Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.

  • Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.

  • Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.

  • Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

  • Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).

  • Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.

  • Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.

  • Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission: Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

  • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

    • Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    • Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    • Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

  • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

    • Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    • Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Scoring Guide for 4025 Assessment 3

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Criterion 1

Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

Distinguished

Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities. Provides examples.

Proficient

Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

Basic

Explains a diagnosis, but may not fully cover outcomes, risks, and complications in the explanation, including those for vulnerable populations.

Non Performance

Does not explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

Criterion 2

Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Distinguished

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis, and identifies how the question meets each of the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

Proficient

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Basic

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process, though the question may not be specific enough to address all the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

Non Performance

Does not describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Criterion 3

Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

Distinguished

Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors, and how the search process was refined to yield the best results.

Proficient

Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

Basic

Describes a search of the literature, though the description may not fully include search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

Non Performance

Does not describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

Criterion 4

Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Distinguished

Explains the content of more than three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Proficient

Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Basic

Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, though not the credibility and relevance.

Non Performance

Does not explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Criterion 5

Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

Distinguished

Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question, identifying assumptions on which the analysis is based.

Proficient

Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

Basic

Analyzes evidence without explaining the answer to a PICO(T) question.

Non Performance

Does not analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

resources linked

PICO(T) Process

This reading list explores the PICO(T) process:

  • Assessment 3: PICO(T) Process.

Communicating Research

This reading list will assist you in developing a PICO(T) question and applying the PICO(T) process:

  • Assessment 3: Communicating Research.

Practice

Central to using the PICO(T) approach to developing a research question is making the question specific enough. This activity will help you practice this:

  • Defining a Research Question.

Creating PICO(T) Questions

This resource provides specifics of creating a research question using PICO(T):

  • Create PICO(T) Questions.

Capella Resources

Review the following Capella resources:

  • Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide.

    • The library research guide will be useful in guiding you through the Capella library, offering tips for searching the literature and other references for your assessments.

  • Databases A-Z: Nursing & Health Sciences.

    • This is a list of the library databases that are relevant to nursing and health sciences.

  • Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences.

    • Library guide to EBP-related topics with a focus on nursing and health sciences.

  • Find Scholarly & Peer-Reviewed Sources.

    • Guide to help you more efficiently locate scholarly and peer-reviewed resources.

  • Get Critical Search Skills.

    • This guide offers a five-step approach to improving your research search effectiveness.

APA Style and Format

Capella University follows the style and formatting guidelines in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, known informally as the APA manual. Refer to the Writing Center’s APA Module for tips on proper use of APA style and format.

Writing Resources

A variety of writing resources are available in the NHS Learner Success Lab, linked in the courseroom navigation menu. Access these resources to help you better understand and improve your writing.

A List Of Capella Library References

American Diabetes Association. (2023, December 12). American diabetes association releases 2023 standards of care in diabetes to guide prevention, diagnosis, and treatment for people living with diabetes | ADA. Diabetes.org. https://diabetes.org/newsroom/american-diabetes-association-2023-standards-care-diabetes-guide-for-prevention-diagnosis-treatment-people-living-with-diabetes

CDC. (2024). About diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/about/diabetic-ketoacidosis.html

Hamdy, O. (2024, March 21). Diabetic ketoacidosis treatment & management: Approach considerations, correction of fluid loss, insulin therapy. Medscape.com. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/118361-treatment

Jerreat, L. (2020). Managing diabetic ketoacidosis. Nursing Standard (through 2013)24(34), 49–55. https://www.proquest.com/docview/219891056

Kalidas, A. J. (2021). The effectiveness of the CRAAP test in evaluating the credibility of sources. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 1–14. https://www.i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25

Lazar, I., Wizeman-Orlov, Hazan, G., Orbach, A., Haim, A., Cavari, Feinstein, Y., Neeman, E., Hershkovitz, E., & Faingelernt. (2023). The role of anion gap normalization time in the management of pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis. Frontiers in Pediatrics11https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1198581

Moustafa, N., Hafez, A. A., Hendy, A., Ibrahim, R. K., Kotp, M. H., Baghdadi, N. A., & Ahmed, S. R. (2025). Nurse-led insulin protocol efficacy for control of hyperglycemia in critically Ill patients. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03553-4

National Diabetes Services Scheme. (2021). National Diabetes Nursing Education Framework Learning Workbookhttps://www.ndss.com.au/wp-content/uploads/national-diabetes-nursing-education-framework-learning-workbook.pdf

Ruiz, C., Golec, K., & Vonderheid, S. C. (2024). Nurses’ experience with patient deterioration and rapid response teams. Applied Nursing Research79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151823

Shaker, M. S., Faltas, S. F. M., & Abdelhady, M. S. (2025). Studying the role of nurses in diabetic ketoacidosis. Journal of Integrative Nursing and Palliative Care6(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.51847/azep6fvilv

Shubrook, J. H., Patel, M., & Young, C. F. (2023). Community-based diabetes awareness strategy with detection and intervention: The mobile diabetes education center. Clinical Diabetes42(1). https://doi.org/10.2337/cd23-0020

Umpierrez, G. E., Davis, G. M., ElSayed, N. A., Gian-Paolo-Fadini, Galindo, R. J., Hirsch, I. B., Klonoff, D. C., McCoy, R. G., Misra, S., Gabbay, R. A., Bannuru, R. R., & Dhatariya, K. K. (2024). Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: A consensus report. Diabetologia67(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06183-8

Best Professors To Choose From For 4025 Class

  • Buddy Wiltcher, EdD, MSN, APRN, FNP-C.
  • Lisa Kreeger, PhD.
  • Linda Matheson, PhD.
  • Erica Alexander, DNP, MSN, BSN.
  • JacQualine Abbe, MS.

(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3

Question 1: From where can I download a free sample for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 3?

Answer 1: You can download a free sample for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 3 from the Tutors Academy website.

Question 2: Where can I find the instructions and rubric file for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 3?

Answer 2: You can find the rubric and instruction files for this assessment on the Tutors Academy sample page for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 3.

Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.

    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

      Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
      Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

        Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

        Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
        Scroll to Top