NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

Seeking guidance for your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3? Our team of experts is available to assist you. Contact us today for support.

We should advocate for the equitable quality of care while operating within the biopsychosocial model, as we anticipate fulfilling the role of master-level nurses. One critical sector that demands our attention is medication management; hence, probable disparities in care can play a role in jeopardising patient safety and outcomes. A yielded poster presentation is the first step of our quality improvement initiative, which is focused on addressing these problems and improving medication management practices within our organisation (Jones et al., et al. 2020). Through elaboration on evidence-based tactics, successful change management strategies, and the added value of interprofessional cooperation, we aim to prepare the way for the permanent delivery of superior medication safety, effectiveness, and equity. Let us embark on this trip together on the safer and more effective way of medication management. This is to give the utmost attention to every patient’s quality of care.

Quality Improvement (QI) Method

The critical component of this continued development is to apply a socio-biopsychological approach in the treatment process. Our initiative will do that through several sticky strategies. On the one hand, we will execute an arduous medication reconciliation process, which includes a detailed recording of the patient’s medication history at the moment of cross-transitions in the healthcare system. This is precisely why discrepancies will be detected and errors in which medication will be minimised. On the other hand, we will create educational materials and programs that would give patients what they need to understand their medication regimen, abide by these rules, and know about the risks and potential side effects of medications (Jones et al., 2020 ). Lastly, we will remain consistent with the guidelines and best practices for medication management provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Therefore, we are committed to working with the best practices as a foundation (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2019).

  • Acknowledging Potential Difficulties:

Healthcare professionals may initially be hesitant to adopt new processes or tools or stick to the old style because they might perceive it as disrupting the workflow or there are manufacturing entrenched practices. Educational efforts may not be enough for patients as many are expected to adhere to their medication regimen by diverse factors such as societal background, health literacy, and cultural perceptions. In the final statement, the barriers to implementing ample resources, such as staff, time and money, may seem possible for successfully adopting comprehensive medication reconciliation and patient education programs.

  • Meeting the Challenges:

The ultimate solution to this situation is our defining action steps. Firstly, we want to involve vital players, the frontline staffers, patients, and the institute’s leadership in the planning and implementation of our project. To achieve this, one should consider proactively soliciting their ideas and opinions and, if necessary, addressing their possible concerns about the change, which can facilitate buy-in and deter resistance. Firstly, we will get tailored patient education material forms and methods to address our patients’ diverse needs and likes. What a person says and how they use tone, emphasis, and pauses contribute significantly to the meaning of each sentence.

Specific Evidence that Supports the Quality Improvement Methods

Proposed quality improvement protocols used in medication management and patient safety that have been documented in the field. In many studies, the first point proved that comprehensive medication reconciliation technology has reduced medication errors (Smith et al., 2021). These tests have also pointed out that the precise documentation and verification of a patient’s medication course through this transition of care is wise as it significantly reduces discrepancies and aids medication safety. Researchers further have pointed out that educational interventions with patients increase medication adherence and the incidence of adverse drug events (Jones et al., 2020). By enabling patients with the necessary information and competencies to utilise medications properly, these initiatives contribute considerably to improving medication safety and health outcomes.

  • Identifying Knowledge Gaps and Areas of Uncertainty:

The accumulated and currently existing data confirm the suggested quality improvement methods and the deep research reveals knowledge gaps and uncertainties that should be investigated further. Regarding this, the medication reconciliation algorithm successfully reduces medication mistakes. However, the quality of implementing and maintaining these processes in different healthcare settings has still not been approved. More investigation has to be done to find the method that can be called the most suitable one for inclusion in medication reconciliation practices and determine the existing obstacles.

Besides that, although patient education interventions have been confirmed to increase medication adherence and worsen adverse drug events, the issue of which specific components and delivery modes work best for different patients remains unclear. Importantly, we are yet to fully understand which components of patient education are vital and how to make programs adaptive to the needs of various populations that may differ in reading ability, cultural background, and socioeconomic status.

Project is Grounded in Successful Change Strategies

Our idea has been designed on the basis of the proven and tested strategies of the change management. To begin with, the support of the 8-Step Process as the plan of the process will be utilized. It is emphasize that this is the heart of the matter by having a powerful group that supports the change, present a transformation point of view that make common sense, and make sure the employees are in the touch of everything. We aim to develop a joint ownership of our quality improvement initiative and obtain furvor through collective participation of all actors at all hierarchical levels and challenges confronting the change process. Through the utilization of the ideas of stakeholder involvement and communication, the new approaches and the subsequent behaviors will be received successfully. While the strategies which we have found to be successful thus far have their place in the implementation process, we expect our efforts to be confronted with a similar number of challenges throughout walking the road to change. To begin with, an obstacle in the healthcare sector by healthcare professionals opposing to changes making it difficult to adopt new practices and processes is resistance to change. One of the challenges of implementing change can be the resistance to change for a number of reasons: it may stem from worries about increased workload, or it being unknown, or doubts of the true benefits of the change.

We will be active players on the field by utilizing multiples (formatted from the given sentence) strategies. However, we will need to identify the key stakeholders which include the project leaders, frontline staff, partners, as well as communities we are working with from the beginning. Among them are staff from frontline, governance, as well as external partners. Indirect engagement of stakeholders at the planning and decision-making stages will be to further the idea of having buy-in and ownership of the proposed changes. The process of such amendments can span across the modification of roadmaps, directing the resources, and craft of communication techniques to tackle problems which arise during the journey.

NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3

Way in Which Interprofessional Teamwork Will Improve the Effectiveness or Efficiency

Collaboration between interprofessional teams will immensely improve the quality of healthcare services in medication management. For starters, interprofessional work will help in teamwork and interaction among healthcare professionals and the service users involved in the medication management procedure. Thanks to initiatives for interactive dialogues and data sharing, teams can jointly find mistakes, share applicable practices, and solve new problems related to the safety of medicine and patient outcomes. For instance, nurses may help design and implement medication procedures, doctors may contribute to identifying medication interaction from clinical evidence, and pharmacists may partake by reviewing medication regimens.

  • Assumptions:

It is associated with the supposition that interprofessional teamwork promotes a collaborative and communicative spirit among healthcare providers and aids in care coordination, thus delivering optimal results. Moreover, it supposes that the workers of this team are cooperative, share information, and bring their knowledge and expertise to the table to accomplish agreed-upon goals. Moreover, it is based on the fact that formal leadership and organisational support are available for the interprofessional teams to work together and, therefore, to surmount the separation from professional positions or hierarchies.

Clear, Concise, and Compelling for the Audience

The quality improvement initiative we are considering should, undoubtedly, be implemented with high-quality communication with our relevant stakeholders in a clear, concise, and compelling manner to ensure buy-in for this process. We design a communication strategy to ensure the audience of our attempts effectively conceives it to convey complex theories and to be appropriately received and persuaded. Initially, we will follow an authoritative method of communication, minimising the usage of complex words and reiterating essential points in an easy-to-understand tone. This will include defining the problem, mission and objectives, and the intended outcomes of the quality improvement (Smith et al., 2020). We will accomplish this objective by dividing the information on the problems into simple components so that the interested ones can easily understand and appreciate the significance of our initiative and its benefits to the patients and outcomes.

Subsequently, we will destroy our communication based on the idiosyncratic needs and climbing of different stakeholder groups because all of them may be familiar with the notions of medication management and quality improvement (Jones & Johnson, 2019). As such, frontline workers dedicated to clinical practice might need more comprehensive details concerning the practical implications of the implemented project for their everyday job, while top-level managers could be more interested in learning about the strategy and expected outcomes from the initiative.


In summary, this quality improvement program on medication management represents a decisive yet creative strategy for dealing with the paramount problems of the patients’ safety, medication compliance, and healthcare quality. By employing evidence-generated practices that include, but are not limited to, comprehensive medication reconciliation and patient education interventions, we anticipate increasing the safety, effectiveness, and equitability of medication management practices within our healthcare organisation. The successful approaches of our initiatives will be the key drivers of this positive change. In addition, by relying on interprofessional teamwork, we are sure that we will be able to create noticeable and long-term medication management outcomes. To achieve this, we pursue engagement with stakeholders and develop a joint commitment to driving a policy change about prescription drug management. In the meantime, we aim to check how things unfold regularly. We are open to critiques, and we keep adjusting our strategy to ensure the delivery of quality improvement remains viable and sustainable and impacts the community.

Click below explore more related sample:
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2


Cha’on, U., Wongtrangan, K., Thinkhamrop, B., Tatiyanupanwong, S., Limwattananon, C., Pongskul, C., Panaput, T., Chalermwat, C., Lert-antiporn, W., Sharma, A., & Anutrakulchai, S. (2020). CKDNET is a quality improvement project that aims to prevent and reduce chronic kidney disease in northeast Thailand. BMC Public Health, 20(1).

Dulay, M., Saxe, J. M., Odden, K., Strewler, A., Lau, A., O’Brien, B., & Shunk, R. (2020). Promoting quality improvement in primary care through a longitudinal, project-based, interprofessional curriculum. MedEdPORTAL, 16(1), 10932.

Gleason, K. T., VanGraafeiland, B., Commodore-Mensah, Y., Walrath, J., Immelt, S., Ray, E., & Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R. (2019). The impact of an innovative curriculum to introduce patient safety and quality improvement content. BMC Medical Education, 19(1).

Hempel, S., O’Hanlon, C., Lim, Y. W., Danz, M., Larkin, J., & Rubenstein, L. (2019). Spread tools: A systematic review of quality improvement toolkits’ components, uptake, and effectiveness. Implementation Science, 14(1).

Locock, L., Kirkpatrick, S., Brading, L., Sturmey, G., Cornwell, J., Churchill, N., & Robert, G. (2019). Involving service users in the qualitative analysis of patient narratives to support healthcare quality improvement. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1).

Majidi, S., Ebekozien, O., Noor, N., Lyons, S. K., McDonough, R., Gandhi, K., Izquierdo, R., Demeterco-Berggren, C., Polsky, S., Basina, M., Desimone, M., Thomas, I., Rioles, N., Jimenez-Vega, J., Malik, F. S., Miyazaki, B., Albanese-O’Neill, A., & Jones, N.-H. Y. (2021). Inequities in health outcomes in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Data from the T1D exchange quality improvement collaborative. Clinical Diabetes, 39(3), 278–283.

Weiner, S., Schwartz, A., Altman, L., Ball, S., Bartle, B., Binns-Calvey, A., Chan, C., Falck-Ytter, C., Frenchman, M., Gee, B., Jackson, J. L., Jordan, N., Kass, B., Kelly, B., Safdar, N., Scholcoff, C., Sharma, G., Weaver, F., & Wopat, M. (2020). Evaluating a patient-collected audio audit and feedback quality improvement program on clinician attention to patient life context and health care costs in the Veterans Affairs health care system. JAMA Network Open, 3(7), e209644.

Need help with your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3? Our experts are ready to assist you. Get in touch with us for support today.

Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

    Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

      Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
      Scroll to Top