- PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case.
Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case
All clinical thought experts, including those with and arranged specialists, swear to consider patients’ longings and necessities while completing ethical clinical therapy. During end-of-life care, ethical difficulties could emerge (Feeley, 2018). This study, as part of PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case, will consider the case of Mr. Martinez, who has COPD and has experienced a spread of respiratory pack infection.
The patient’s directions, the family’s preferences, Mr. Martinez’s overall quality of life, and the moral and ethical issues related to end-of-life care will be thoroughly examined in this case assessment. It will explore the balance between the healthcare professional’s responsibility and Mr. Martinez’s severe respiratory distress in the workplace.
Patient Directives and Family Concerns
Before certification, Mr and Mrs Martinez came to an understanding that if, at anything, his heart quits pulsating or he quits breathing, he does not need life-saving measures taken. An expert entered the DNR demand into his patient blueprint, and treatment started for the upper respiratory disease for which he was yielded. While under the careful idea of the clinical focus, Mr. Martinez was getting against dirtying arranged specialists, liquids, and oxygen, and his hypothesis was moving along. Sadly, somebody expanded Mr. Martinez’s oxygen rate, which made him wheeze for air, contemplating crazy respiratory torture.
-
Honoring DNR Amid Complications
At this point, the deals should the staff treat Mr Martinez with the little brain to what his DNR demands since he is right now having a difficult time because of a clinical mess up and not a diminishing in his well-being? The Martinez family’s wishes should be kept in this overview. Oxygen therapy would be embraced to treat respiratory problems, yet the patient should never get noticeable means like chest compressions, intubation, or living-saving cures (Feeley, 2018).
Ethical principles
Values, standards, or interests should be contemplated when ethical hardships emerge. Different models for this sort of moral choice were viewed as theories that examine ethical difficulties in thinking about contemplations, like utilitarianism, in which the goal is to expand the positive outcomes to anything that several individuals could be expected to mull over the continuous circumstance (Pettersson et al., 2018)—the four well-known ethical theories of opportunity, non-hurtfulness, advantage, and worth mirror these social orders.
Consequentialism contemplations of impact and ordinariness are fanned out. We are committed to safeguarding human pride in all individuals and treating them as associates, paying little mind to the effect (Pettersson et al., 2018).
PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Withhold Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case
The considerations of non-ruthlessness and worth are utilitarian since they suggest expanding others’ well-being through empowering positive results and limiting naughtiness. Close deontology theory, the morals of massive quality, is a well-known bioethical theory (Pettersson et al., 2018). An ethical master has unequivocal properties. Along these lines, the suggested individual can energize a fitting activity plan for a particular climate or practice. A key rule is that only an “unprecedented” individual does the “right” thing (Pettersson et al., 2018).
-
Nurses’ Role in Supporting DNR Decisions and Patient Autonomy
Orderlies’ sweeping method for overseeing patients’ and family individuals’ care outfits them to work with the patient, families, and clinical gathering to execute organized decisions when they do not reestablish choices are being made. The American Clinical Orderlies Affiliation embraces patients’ capabilities of self. This honour gathers independence from undesired medications, for example, recuperation attempts.
Nursing General plan of rules with Standards of Getting Ready methodology supports approaches 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 2.3 (“Ana Position Clarification: Nursing Care and Do not Reestablish (DNR) Choices,” 2020).
Clinicians have an ethical obligation to help patients in their decision-making when the head is to ensure substitute chiefs who go with choices for the patient. The American Experts Association (ANA) advances methodologies that urge orderlies to share significantly more totally in objective of-care visits with patients and family individuals, particularly discussions about not reestablishing orders. (“Ana Position Verbalization: Nursing Care and Don’t Reestablish (Dnr) Choices,” 2020).
Conclusion
Making an oversight that hurts a patient, for instance, expanding Mr. Martinez’s oxygenation, is the most senseless, upsetting experience a clinical expert can have. Following committing a screw-up thusly, experts dependably endeavour to repay by over-finishing their undertakings and attempting to address their blunder (Nahidi et al., 2019).
-
Respecting Patient Treatment Preferences
Unequivocally, when the mishandling happened, and the patient went into aspiratory get, the decision to endeavour recuperation should have been founded on the patient’s affinities rather than the clinician’s best given Mr Martinez. Based on an ethical assessment, the standard of ′do no harm′ does not best a patient’s opportunity to decline treatment (Nahidi et al., 2019). Explore our assessment PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 1 Matrix of Ethical Theories for more information.
References
Ana’s position statement: Nursing care and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions. (2020). OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3912/ojin.vol26no01poscol02
Feeley, M. (2018, April). Med Surg Nursing. https://www-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/docview/2019074480?pq-origsite=summon
Nahidi, M., Fayyazi Bordbar, M., Tavakkoli, K., & Fayyazi Bordbar, A. (2019). Investigating the attitude of healthcare providers, patients, and their families toward “do not resuscitate” orders in an Iranian oncology hospital. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 25(3), 440. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_29_19
Pettersson, M., Hedström, M., & Höglund, A. T. (2018). Ethical competence in DNR decisions –a qualitative study of Swedish physicians and nurses in haematology and oncology care. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0300-7