NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5
Reflection
As a part of this reflection, it is possible to discuss the main accomplishments that were achieved during the work at the separate stages of this course, with the main emphasis upon the enhancement of the literature synthesis and the collaboration at the project location. In each of these domains, I will be able to evaluate to what extent my activities served the goals, what worked and what did not, and what could be done in the future (Smith, 2020).
This reflection will also afford me a further enhancement of the critical thinking and problem solving domain in the improvement of my progress towards the DX doctoral project as I progress towards the delivery of NHS-FPX9903. In this reflection, I will discuss the competencies by consulting research and evidence-based practices to augment my interventions as well as offering detailed documentation of my skills development and learning throughout the project implementation phase.
Are you Looking for guidance for NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5? Our experts are here to assist you. Reach out to us for support today.
Opportunities Related to the Development of a Literature Synthesis
-
Process
The process of accomplishing the literature synthesis for this paper was enclosed within a framework of a systematic search for the relevant literature and critical evaluation of the sources that were identified. Starting with questions related to the themes of my doctoral project, it will help make my literature search more encompassing and relevant to the objectives of the project.
For the current work, I gathered articles from peer-reviewed journals using the PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases; these articles featured articles published after 2019 only to provide the highest-quality material available to support my work ( Johnson et al. , 2021).
-
Outcomes
Literature synthesis provided a strong body of accumulated knowledge to identify sources of evidence of the best practices and the areas with the lack of current knowledge on the topic of my project.
The present review served as a fundamental basis for the practice decisions regarding the project interventions and the practice change. The synthesis also assisted in defining gaps that require additional research, which assisted in the direction of my project.
-
Success
Another strength of the process of the literature synthesis was the possibility of establishing some of the programs and techniques that could immediately be used in my project site based on the evidence.
NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 5 Reflection
For instance, the implementation of patient care delivery models was found out to dispel patients’ quality of care and satisfaction (Taylor & Thompson, 2020). It also helped in forging a theoretical foundation for the project, whereby all the interventions that were done could be properly backed by research findings and data.
-
Improvement Opportunities
Some challenges were noted to have been exercised in the synthesis of the literature hence reducing the effectiveness of the synthesis process. One of the concerns was the identification of the specific articles that were the most current and up-to-date regarding the topic area as healthcare is continually developing and a great number of results can be considered outdated.
To this effect, when preparing the next update of my literature review, I will focus on including more recent literature, if any is available, and evidence-based research findings that may exist (Miller & Johnson, 2022). Furthermore, I will try to expand my ability to critique the quality as well as the relevance of the studies that would be employed.
Collaboration and Other Relevant Work at the Project Site
-
Process
On-line cooperation at the project site initiated with the identification of communication media and provision of the assignment of tasks, responsibilities, and authorities. Biweekly staff meetings involving the medical practitioners, administrative employees, and other key stakeholders were able to ensure that everyone was on the same page with regards to the developments of the project.
To ensure that I could work with the other students, I employed physical meetings, online conferences, and electronic correspondence. Also, there has been the establishment of an online collaborative project management tool where tasks tackling and their deadlines and responsibilities are well outlined (Smith & Jones, 2021).
-
Outcomes
Numerous advantages were noted due to the performance of the collaborative efforts. Targeted project goals were met to the timeline, and the sophistication of the project’s outcomes enhanced by the contribution of the project team’s members’ established diverse competencies.
For example, when developing a new patient care procedure, clinical practitioners’ and administrators’ knowledge helped expand and improve the outcome to maximize the operational strategy. The project was regularly checked, and proposed changes were incorporated regarding the team’s response that made the project’s environment more dynamic and adaptable (Johnson et al. , 2022).
-
Success
Remarkably, the work of the engaging collaboration was to fulfill a multidisciplinary framework of patient care that was met with a positive response from employees and patients. Parallel to enhancing the external quality, this approach also ensured that patients gain better results as well as propagated the ideas of teamwork and respect among the healthcare providers.
Organization of care and patient flow betterment as well as reduction of patient waiting times were some of the problems, which were successfully addressed through the collaboration, with the focus on the identification of best practice solutions (Taylor & Thompson, 2020).
-
Improvement Opportunities
There were also some opportunities for the improvement. There were typically two major issues in the process – the first one was the coordination of the working schedule and the second one was the availability of the students, who were the members of the teams. In response to this, I intend to accommodate meetings to certain hours and incorporate the use of tools that allow for username communication.
In this, the research found cases where disagreements by the managers hindered the processes of decision making. To enhance this, I will align efforts and concentrate on the elaboration of a particular set of improvement priorities concerning conflict solving skills and creating a perspective where various attitudes are regarded not as significances but as prospects (Miller & Johnson, 2022).
Conclusion
This paper has been another good experience in pondering on the processes that incited the development of the literature synthesis and some of the accomplishments and challenges encountered in the project site. The literature synthesis paved the way for an adequate synthesis of the best evidence in the project and practice to make relevant decisions as to point out the significance of current research. Integration with different professions at the project site led to more inventive and effective processes of patients’ treatment.
However, this has also a flip side of the coin as it exposed the issues of improving means and ways of communication and conflict management. This awareness of personal biases, beliefs, and opinions has been very useful when it comes to improving my methods in the analysis of literature and cooperation.
This means that by continuing to be receptive to others’ ideas and ideas of others as well as by being a perpetual learner then I will be able to work on my skills as I work on my doctoral project as well as my future professional endeavors. In the future, I will incorporate these ideas to make sure that my endeavors in the sphere are knowledgeable, not prejudiced, and adequate for continuously changing the sphere of healthcare.
If you need complete information about class 9902, click below to view a related sample:
NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 3 Literature Synthesis
References
Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S.-J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: A literature review and recommended definition. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3
Green, H., Fernandez, R., & MacPhail, C. (2021). The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing, 38(6).
https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959
Knapp, M., & Wong, G. (2020). Economics and mental health: The current scenario. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 3–14.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692
Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332
Sukhera, J., Gonzalez, C., & Watling, C. J. (2020). Implicit bias in health professions. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1.
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003173
Zhang, L., Li, H., & Chen, K. (2020). Effective risk communication for public health emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-ncov) outbreak in wuhan, china. Healthcare, 8(1), 64.