NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1 Demonstrating Effective Leadership

NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD

NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1

Demonstrating Effective Leadership

Student Name

Capella University

NHS-FPX 8002 Collaboration Communication, and Case Analysis for Doctoral Learners

Professor Name

Date

Demonstrating Effective Leadership

Opioid addiction, clinically referred to as opioid use disorder (OUD), represents a chronic, relapsing condition characterized by the compulsive use of opioids despite harmful consequences. The disorder disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations, including individuals of lower socioeconomic status, those experiencing homelessness, pregnant women, adolescents, and rural communities with limited healthcare access (Herlinger & Hughes, 2021). The formation of a coalition focused on opioid addiction must incorporate diverse stakeholders capable of addressing the complex social determinants of health that contribute to addiction vulnerability, while also working to improve treatment accessibility, coordination of services, and long-term recovery support systems. The assessment will examine the development of an interprofessional coalition to address opioid addiction in vulnerable populations through collaborative leadership to enhance treatment accessibility.

Factors Contributed to Opioid Addiction

The opioid epidemic represents a multifaceted public health crisis driven by interconnected contributing factors operating across socioeconomic, clinical, and structural domains. From a population health perspective, key factors include pharmaceutical industry marketing practices, prescriber behaviors, economic distress, limited treatment access, stigmatization of substance use disorders, and social determinants of health such as poverty, unemployment, and housing instability (Roberts, 2024). The factors create disproportionate vulnerability among marginalized populations, including rural communities, individuals with co-occurring mental health conditions, and those with limited healthcare access (Volkow & Blanco, 2020). The epidemic’s complexity is further compounded by the changing landscape of illicit drug supplies, with an increasing prevalence of high-potency synthetic opioids like fentanyl significantly elevating overdose mortality rates, thus creating new challenges for intervention approaches.

Insights Regarding Affected Groups and Social Determinants of Health

Opioid addiction disproportionately affects several vulnerable populations, including rural communities, individuals with co-occurring mental health disorders, veterans, pregnant women, and homeless persons. The social determinants exacerbating the vulnerability encompass environmental factors such as geographic isolation and medically underserved areas; social elements including trauma histories, stigmatization, and fragmented support systems; and financial barriers like unemployment, insurance limitations, and treatment affordability. The gaps reveal the systematic racism in healthcare, housing, and social determinants of health contribute to systematic disinvestment of resources, housing instability, and limited economic opportunities, where opioid use may be an option for coping with toxic stress and adversity (Rafful and Rodríguez, 2022). The interaction of the determinants results in compound processes through which individuals become addicted, and will call for appropriate treatment models to target not only the clinical aspects but also the social and vocational issues.

Formation of Interprofessional Coalition

The multifaceted nature of the opioid problem requires a multi-system collaboration of professionals in healthcare, social services, justice, and community agencies to deliver cohesive prevention, intervention, and recovery programs.

Coalition Team Members and The Contribution

Coalition Team Member	Contribution
Dr. M.R., Addiction Medicine Specialist	Dr. M.R. will provide clinical expertise in medication-assisted treatment protocols, withdrawal management, and evidence-based approaches to opioid use disorder treatment across the continuum of care.
Ms. L.T., Public Health Official	Ms. L.T. will coordinate surveillance systems for monitoring opioid-related morbidity and mortality, implement public education campaigns, and align coalition efforts with state and federal initiatives.
Mr. K.J., Recovery Community Organization Director	Mr. K.J. will ensure the integration of peer support services, develop recovery-oriented systems of care, and represent the perspectives of individuals with lived experience in all coalition initiatives.
Dr. P.S., Mental Health Professional	Dr. P.S. will address co-occurring mental health conditions, develop trauma-informed care approaches, and coordinate integrated behavioral health services for individuals with opioid use disorder.
Officer B.M., Law Enforcement Representative	Officer B.M. will implement deflection and pre-arrest diversion programs, coordinate naloxone distribution to first responders, and facilitate connections between criminal justice and treatment systems.
Ms. E.D., Social Services Director	Ms. E.D. will address social determinants of health including housing instability, food insecurity, and employment barriers while coordinating wrap-around support services for vulnerable populations.
Mr. V.C., Health Insurance Representative	Mr. V.C. will develop payment models supporting comprehensive opioid treatment, remove prior authorization barriers for evidence-based care, and expand coverage for recovery support services.
Dr. N.W., Primary Care Physician	Dr. N.W. will implement opioid prescribing guidelines, integrate addiction screening into primary care settings, and expand access to buprenorphine treatment in medical practices.
Ms. T.H., Harm Reduction Specialist	Ms. T.H. will coordinate syringe services programs, naloxone distribution initiatives, fentanyl testing resources, and outreach services to engage high-risk individuals not connected to traditional healthcare.
Dr. J.L., Academic Researcher	Dr. J.L. will evaluate coalition initiatives, conduct community needs assessments, analyze outcome data, and translate emerging research into actionable practice recommendations.

Contribution to Goal

The strategic selection of coalition members representing diverse sectors creates a comprehensive ecosystem of expertise necessary to address the multifaceted nature of opioid addiction across prevention, treatment, and recovery domains. Each member contributes specialized knowledge addressing specific vulnerability factors affecting high-risk populations, enabling coordinated interventions targeting both individual clinical needs and systemic barriers (Fleming et al., 2023). The intentional inclusion of stakeholders with complementary capabilities facilitates integrated approaches to service delivery, policy development, and community engagement essential for sustainable improvements in care accessibility and population health outcomes.

Strategies to Optimize Collaboration and Communication

Frameworks like situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) help healthcare practitioners and other professionals from different fields to communicate in a more structured manner and cross the barriers of different organizations. Participation in collaborative case conferences with the regular rotational presiding officer is conducive to ensuring the membership in the coalition has respect and division of powers (Elias & Paradies, 2021). The implementation of multi-agency databases with shared goals for performance reporting establishes an environment for all the stakeholders to value health improvement.

Issues Affecting Collaboration

Interprofessional collaboration in addressing opioid addiction faces significant barriers including divergent philosophical approaches to addiction treatment between harm reduction advocates and abstinence-focused providers. Organizational silos and fragmented funding streams create substantial challenges to coordinating care across health, social service, and criminal justice systems (Wilson et al., 2021). Professional hierarchies and disciplinary territoriality may impede effective information sharing and integrated decision-making processes essential for comprehensive treatment implementation.

Ethical Considerations

The coalition addressing opioid addiction confronts numerous ethical challenges, particularly concerning equitable resource distribution and treatment accessibility. Limitations in treatment infrastructure disproportionately affect rural and economically disadvantaged communities, creating potential scenarios where geographic location determines recovery opportunities rather than clinical needs (Albright et al., 2023). Competing resource allocation priorities emerge when determining the investment balance between prevention, harm reduction, treatment, and recovery support services, particularly given limited financial resources. Ethical tensions also arise regarding medication-assisted treatment access, with stigma and misunderstanding sometimes restricting evidence-based interventions despite demonstrated efficacy.

Other ethical issues related to patients’ self-decision-making, consent, and forced treatment, especially in prisons, detention institutions, and other situations. The ethical principle of justice demands an examination of systemic disparities in treatment approaches, particularly the concerning pattern where racial minorities with OUD often face punitive consequences while Caucasian patients more frequently receive therapeutic interventions (Elias & Paradies, 2021). Substance use data sharing necessitates consideration of precise privacy issues within a healthcare coalition as members work to maintain the confidentiality of specific clients and address the need for intersectoral coordination of care. Ethical frameworks require meaningful engagement of people with lived experience in decision-making processes while avoiding tokenism and commitment to inclusive recovery voices.

Application of Ethical Principles on Micro and Meso Level

At the micro level, ethical principles manifest in individual opioid treatment encounters through informed consent processes and shared decision-making. Providers must balance beneficence when prescribing medication-assisted treatment with respect for autonomy in recovery goal setting. Non-maleficence requires careful consideration of treatment side effects and potential stigmatization (Ash, 2022). At the meso level, distributive justice guides equitable resource allocation across geographic regions and demographic groups. Healthcare organizations must implement fair access policies to medication-assisted treatment (Clapp et al., 2023). System designs should prioritize comprehensive care coordination while addressing implicit biases that affect treatment quality for marginalized populations.

Application of Ethical Code of Ethics

The multidisciplinary opioid coalition must integrate complementary ethical frameworks from various professional codes. Medical professionals adhere to principles of beneficence and non-maleficence outlined in the American Medical Association Code (Ash, 2022). Social workers follow the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code emphasizing social justice and dignity (Ash, 2022). Public health officials operate under ethical principles prioritizing population welfare and equitable resource distribution. Law enforcement representatives balance public safety with proportional intervention approaches. Research supports interdisciplinary ethics training improving collaborative outcomes (Boivin et al., 2021). Evidence from integrated care models demonstrates the explicit discussion of competing ethical priorities reduces moral distress and enhances treatment consistency.

Collaboration, Diversity, and Inclusion

Collaboration is the process of working together across disciplines to achieve shared goals. Diversity refers to the inclusion of individuals with varied backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. Inclusion is the active engagement of all participants in decision-making processes and implementation (Roberts, 2024). Effective coalition formation addressing opioid addiction requires intentional diversity across professional disciplines, ethnic backgrounds, socioeconomic perspectives, and lived experience. Inclusion principles necessitate equitable representation from communities disproportionately affected by opioid use disorders. Cultural humility practices must be embedded in governance structures through shared leadership models. The demographic composition should reflect the populations being served. Research demonstrates diverse coalitions generate more innovative solutions and achieve improved health outcomes (Smith et al., 2022). Evidence supports structured inclusion of persons with lived experience of addiction, informing more responsive program design.

Establishing a culture of inclusion requires explicit anti-stigma training for all coalition members. Regular cultural competency assessments should inform ongoing development needs. Shared decision-making protocols must prioritize equitable participation from all stakeholders. Community engagement strategies should include culturally tailored outreach methods. Resource allocation decisions must address transportation barriers, medication access, and environmental determinants of health. Evidence-based approaches include community-based participatory research methods (Roberts, 2024). Studies demonstrate community health worker integration improves treatment retention among marginalized populations (Ignoffo et al., 2022). Transparent accountability metrics should track equity-related outcomes.

Best Practices

Evidence-based communication practices for opioid-focused coalitions include structured SBAR protocols during case consultations. Regular interprofessional huddles improve care coordination across disciplines. Standardized terminology regarding addiction treatment reduces misunderstandings between the healthcare and criminal justice sectors (Fleming et al., 2023). Shared electronic platforms with appropriate privacy safeguards enhance information exchange efficiency. Research by Hyslop et al. (2024) demonstrates a reduction in treatment discontinuity with formalized communication workflows. Meta-analyses indicate coalitions employing facilitated dialogue techniques report higher levels of sustained collaboration (Sjølie et al., 2021). Studies support psychological safety protocols, enabling candid discussion of treatment disagreements. The implementation of closed-loop communication systems confirms the transmission of critical information across organizational boundaries.

Literature Review

Research literature provides evidence-based foundations for developing comprehensive opioid interventions for vulnerable populations. The qualitative analysis by Coombs et al. (2022) demonstrated that integrated care models combining medication-assisted treatment with psychosocial supports yield superior outcomes. Implementation science research identifies essential organizational capacities for successful program adoption. Health services research quantifies accessibility barriers requiring targeted intervention. Cost-effectiveness analyses inform resource allocation decisions across prevention and treatment continuums. The coalition should utilize literature on contingency management approaches showing 40% higher treatment retention rates (Coombs et al., 2022). Evidence supports harm reduction strategies as critical engagement pathways for high-risk individuals not connected to traditional healthcare systems.

The research provides actionable frameworks for integrating addiction treatment within acute care settings serving vulnerable populations. Mahmoud et al. (2022) investigated rural-urban disparities in medication-assisted treatment access, identifying telehealth solutions with promising implementation outcomes. The study offers evidence-based approaches for addressing geographic barriers through technology-enhanced service delivery. Both studies employ mixed-methods designs combining quantitative outcome measures with qualitative implementation factors. The coalition should utilize complementary research perspectives when designing comprehensive interventions addressing both clinical effectiveness and implementation feasibility.

Conclusion

Effective leadership in addressing opioid addiction among vulnerable populations requires a multifaceted approach integrating diverse stakeholders in collaborative action. The proposed coalition structure strategically combines clinical expertise, public health perspectives, community voices, and systems-level representatives to address immediate treatment needs and underlying social determinants. By implementing evidence-based communication protocols, ethical decision-making frameworks, and inclusive engagement strategies, the coalition can overcome interprofessional challenges while developing comprehensive interventions.

Need expert guidance for your NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 2? Get personalized leadership portrait help from Tutors Academy today!

Instructions To Write NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1

If you need guidance to write your NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1 Demonstrating Effective Leadership, contact Tutors Academy. Our expert tutors are ready to help you succeed!

Instruction file for 8002 Assessment 1

Assessment 1

Demonstrating Effective Leadership

Instructions	Resources	Activity	AI prompt 1	AI prompt 2	AI prompt 3
Attempt 2 submissions are unavailable until target dates are set is submitting attempts is allowed after setting these dates.

Write an 8-10 page paper in a population-based health context.

Resolving population health concerns requires the combined efforts of numerous agencies and individuals to address the Triple Aim of improving the patient experience, improving the health of populations, and reducing costs. This requires an interprofessional and collaborative effort to address the complex factors at the individual organizational, community, and policy levels associated with the multiple factors affecting the health and well-being of our communities (Graftmader et al., 2016).

As a scholar practitioner in the field, you may be expected to develop and lead a diverse team of healthcare professionals, civic leaders, community stakeholders, constituents, community members, and other interested parties, as well as city, state, and government agencies in addressing a wide range of issues affecting the health of diverse groups.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply your leadership skills to form a collaborative, interprofessional coalition to address a population-based health concern from a nursing, public health, or health administration perspective.

Reference

Graftmader, C., Sakurada, B., & Nordisk, N. (2016). Preparing health care and public health professionals for team performance: The community as the classroom. National Academy of Medicine.

Scenario

Government officials are taking action to address a chronic population health concern in your area. As a member of this community, you have a good understanding of the local demographics and population health issues, including the potential implications for policy making, healthcare systems, service utilization, clinical practice, education, and the workforce. In your role as a doctoral graduate and healthcare practitioner, you have been asked to:

Evaluate key aspects (including the social determinants of health) of the selected population health issue from the topic list.
Lead a coalition of your choosing (a coalition of community members and organizations, clinical providers, healthcare organizations, and civic and governmental agencies) to achieve the coalition’s goals), which may include prevention efforts, quality improvement, service utilization, and the reduction of healthcare costs.

This leadership position requires the ability to promote prevention efforts, quality improvement, service utilization and the reduction of healthcare costs, as well as skills in the following areas:

Effective and ethical leadership.
Interprofessional communication.
Collaboration, inclusion, and application of new and existing knowledge to solve problems and inform decision-making.

Preparation

For this assessment, you will select one of these topics to address in the given scenario:

Topics for the paper: Demonstrating Effective Leadership

Health disparities and social determinants of health:
- Focus on vulnerable or high-risk groups and on decreasing disparities between groups. You can select a specific group with a focus on the person’s experience of care, services, and resources (quality and satisfaction), improving the health of the population, and reducing per capita cost. This will be the focus for the coalition.
Pandemic, for example, COVID-19:
- Focus on a vulnerable or high-risk group related to population health, including the person’s experience of care, services and resources (quality and satisfaction), improving the health of the population, and reducing per capita cost. This will be the focus for the coalition.
Asthma and children:
- Focus on a vulnerable or high-risk group including the person’s experience of care, services and resources (quality and satisfaction), improving the health of the population, and reducing per capita cost. This will be the focus for the coalition.
Opioid addiction:
- Focus on a vulnerable or high-risk group including the person’s experience of care, services, and resources (quality and satisfaction), improving the health of the population, and reducing per capita cost. This will be the focus for the coalition.
Obesity:
- Focus on a vulnerable or high-risk group including the person’s experience of care, services, and resources (quality and satisfaction), improving the health of the population, and reducing per capita cost. This will be the focus for the coalition.

Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.

Instructions

Evaluate key aspects of a chronic population health concern. In addition, select members for a collaborative, interprofessional coalition that you would lead to achieve the stated goal. Coalition membership can include, but is not limited to, key community members and organizations, clinical providers, and local and state agencies.

This position requires the ability to lead a coalition, identifying potential barriers and best practices for communication and collaboration and addressing issues relevant to diversity and inclusion, clinical practice, and the use of evidence in the field to promote change. The focus of this paper and your analysis is leading the coalition versus resolving the population health topic selected!

Example Assessment

You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 1 Exemplar [PDF].

Topic Headings

Create topic headings for each section as noted in the instructions and exemplar paper.

Contributing Factors:
- Analyze the impact of factors that contribute to this chronic population health concern.
  - Examine the situation from a population health perspective.
  - Provide context surrounding this concern.
  - Identify the affected groups, as well as the environmental, social, and financial factors.
Coalition to Address the Population Health Topic Selected:
- Form a collaborative, interprofessional coalition to address this chronic population health concern.
  - Consider, among others, key community members and organizations, clinical providers, and local and state agencies when making your selections.
  - Select 5-10 members.
  - Who must be included?
  - Why?
  - How will member selection contribute to the goal?
  - Develop a table as demonstrated in the exemplar paper to list your selections and the rationale for inclusion (add rows as needed):

Coalition Team Members	Contribution

Issues Affecting Collaboration:
- What potential issues might arise affecting interprofessional collaboration?
Strategies to Optimize Collaboration:
- What strategies are needed to optimize collaboration and communication among coalition members?
Ethical Issues:
- Explain potential ethical issues that might be relevant for the coalition to consider in addressing its mission.
  - Consider access to care, financial barriers, environmental constraints, and the distribution of resources.
  - Explain how ethical principles would apply in particular situations on a micro or meso level.
    - Micro level—individual care encounters.
    - Meso level—how systems are organized to deliver and ensure quality care for patients and populations (Ho & Pinney, 2016).
  - Consider ethical codes of conduct applicable across disciplines represented in your coalition.
  - What evidence supports your conclusions?
Collaboration, Diversity, and Inclusion:
- Explain the principles of diversity and inclusion applicable to the formation of your coalition and its interactions with the community.
  - Consider the impact of a diverse team on achieving coalition goals.
  - How would you work within the coalition to establish a culture of inclusion, respect, and value?
  - How would you promote community engagement, cultural awareness, health equity, and access to resources? Resources can include, but are not limited to medications, transportation, and environmental resources.
  - What are some best practices for interprofessional communication for this group?
  - What evidence supports your conclusions?
Literature Review to Address the Population Health Topic Selected:
- Explain how literature and research in the field can be used to develop best practices for addressing this chronic population health concern.
  - Locate two current, peer-reviewed studies that coalition members should consider as foundational to developing an evidence-based intervention for the situation.
  - Briefly explain how each study is relevant to the chronic population health concern.
Conclusion:
- Proofread your writing to avoid errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your evaluation.

Additional Requirements

Document Format and Length

Style: Format your paper using APA style.
- Apply correct APA-formatting to your document, including headers, headings, spacing, and margins.
- Apply correct APA-formatting to all source citations.
- Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
  - A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
  - Appropriate section headings.
Length: Your paper should be 8-10 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Flow: Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

Supporting Evidence

Cite 4-5 credible sources published within the last five years from peer-reviewed journals, other scholarly resources, professional industry publications, and assigned readings to support your case assessments and recommendations.

Assessment Grading

The assessment requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each of the seven main tasks. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be evaluated.

References

Ho, A., & Pinney, S. (2016). Redefining ethical leadership in a 21st-century healthcare system [PDF]. Healthcare Management Forum, 29(1), 39–42. https://journals-sagepub-com.library.capella.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/0840470415613910

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply Interprofessional collaboration, communication, and leadership best practices to advance population health.
- Analyze the impact of factors that contribute to a chronic population health concern.
- Form a collaborative, interprofessional coalition to address a chronic population health concern.
Competency 2: Demonstrate effective leadership in practices that advance diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- Explain potential ethical issues that might be relevant for a healthcare coalition to consider in addressing its mission.
- Explain the principles of diversity and inclusion applicable to the formation of a healthcare coalition and its interactions with the community.
Competency 3: Explain how scholar practitioners function as leaders in the field of healthcare.
- Explain how literature and research in the field can be used to develop best practices for addressing a chronic population health concern.
Competency 5: Address assessment purpose in effective written or multimedia presentations. Incorporating appropriate evidence and communicating in a form and style consistent with applicable professional and academic standards.
- Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
- Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

References For NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1

Albright, D. L., Suntai, Z., McDaniel, J. T., Johnson, K., Henson, H., Robertson, E., & McIntosh, S. (2023). Opioid use disorder among the economically disadvantaged in the rural south. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 17(4), 418. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001142

Ash, B. E. (2022). Social work and social justice: A conceptual review. Social Work, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac042

Boivin, N., Ruane, J., Quigley, S. P., Harper, J., & Weiss, M. J. (2021). Interdisciplinary collaboration training: An example of a preservice training series. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4), 1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00561-z

Clapp, P., Karow, M., Wackernah, R. C., & Sanelli, B. K. (2023). Ethical issues in substance misuse and addiction-related research. Substance Use and Addiction Research, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-98814-8.00014-7

Coombs, N. C., Campbell, D. G., & Caringi, J. (2022). A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. Bio Med Central Health Services Research, 22(1), 438. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2

Davis, B. P., Mitchell, S. A., Weston, J., Dragon, C., Luthra, M., Kim, J., Stoddard, H., & Ander, D. (2023). Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) education for health care students: Assessment of a training program. MedEdPORTAL, 19. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11293

Elias, A., & Paradies, Y. (2021). The costs of institutional racism and its ethical implications for healthcare. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10073-0

Fleming, T., Collins, A. B., Boyd, J., Knight, K. R., & McNeil, R. (2023). “It’s no foundation, there’s no stabilization, you’re just scattered”: A qualitative study of the institutional circuit of recently-evicted people who use drugs. Social Science & Medicine, 324, 115886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115886

Herlinger, K., & Hughes, A. L. (2021). Opioid use disorder and the brain: A clinical perspective. Addiction, 117(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15636

Hyslop, A., Swazo, R., & Smith, J. P. (2024). “A friendly reminder” – Improving workflow and efficiency in a pulmonary fellows’ outpatient continuity clinic. Heart & Lung, 63, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.10.007

Ignoffo, S., Anast, H., Banks, M., Morris, R., & Jay, K. (2022). Clinical integration of community health workers to reduce health inequities in overburdened and under-resourced populations. Population Health Management, 25(2), 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2021.0376

Mahmoud, H., Naal, H., Whaibeh, E., & Smith, A. (2022). Telehealth-based delivery of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder: A critical review of recent developments. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(9), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01346-z

Rafful, C., & Rodríguez, C. M. (2022). The need for structural interventions for persons who misuse opioids. Springer EBooks, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09936-6_7

Roberts, D. L. (2024). Reframing the response to the opioid crisis: The critical role of resilience in public health. Open Health, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ohe-2023-0006

Sjølie, E., Strømme, A., & Vlemmix, J. (2021). Team-skills training and real-time facilitation as a means for developing student teachers’ learning of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103477

Smith, P., Bolton, K. A., Dam, J., Nichols, M., Alston, L., Johnstone, M., & Allender, S. (2022). The impact of coalition characteristics on outcomes in community-based initiatives targeting the social determinants of health: A systematic review. Bio Med Central Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13678-9

Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2020). The changing opioid crisis: Development, challenges and opportunities. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0661-4

Wilson, M., Bray, B. S., Remsberg, C. M., Kobayashi, R., & Richardson, B. (2021). Interprofessional education on opioid use and pain identifies team-based learning needs. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(4), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.11.011

Best Professors To Choose From For 8002 Class

Dr. Kathleen Zajic, PhD, MS.
Jessica Mioduszewski, DNP.
Andrea Murray, DNP, MSN.
Jennifer Naimark, DNP, MS, BSN.
Lisa Drumb, DNP, MSN, BSN.

(FAQs) related to NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1

Question 1: From where can I download a free sample for NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1?

Answer 1: You can download a free sample for NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1 from the Tutors Academy website.

Question 2: Where can I find the instructions and rubric file for NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1?

Answer 2: You can find the rubric and instruction files for this assessment on the Tutors Academy sample page for NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1.

NHS FPX 8002 Assessment 1 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD