Using Data to Make Evidence-Based Technology Recommendations
Hi, I am XYZ, and today, I am here to talk to you about the importance of NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 informatics/technology implementation in healthcare, specifically at community hospitals. Healthcare providers are now involved with implementing informatics, and technology is considered one of the top priorities because of its value to patients and organizations (Agha-Mir-Salim & Sarmiento, 2020).
Explore our exceptional services by clicking here. Enjoy a discount on your first order!
Best online class taking service
This presentation shows that evidenced-based technology application is imperative in healthcare, focusing on Leapfrog and MediCare Compare success levels. We intend to identify a community hospital as our case study and establish how informatics improves the delivery of patient services and quality of care by analyzing the factors involved and presenting proof-based recommendations.
Leapfrog Grade and Medicare Compare Score
We pick out a community hospital and investigate its caring aspects. As disclosed by Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade of the community hospital, it has received an overall grade of ‘B’, which reflects its dedication towards implementing safety practices in all departments, starting from infection control to medication management as well as surgical care (Braun et al., 2020). The grade issued from the Leapfrog demonstrates that numerous safety measures have been adopted by the Hospital and done successfully, but should be given in a few other areas.
Regarding infection prevention, the local Hospital has done its job exceptionally well. It was able to keep the rate of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) to a minimum, including central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs) (Haddadin & Regunath, 2022). The administration has enhanced disinfection and cleaning procedures to protect the patients and medical staff from the possible spread of infectious organisms. The community hospital has utilized cross-cutting strategies for medication safety to minimize drug errors and prevent adverse effects (Tariq & Scherbak, 2023). Those approaches include a patient medication reconciliation process upon admitting and discharging, pharmacist-led medication reviews, and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems employed for electronic prescription and medication administration.
Regarding surgical issues, the community hospital has competently delivered its reliable standards of quality and safety. Surgical teams continually follow evidence-based strategies, including preoperative checklists, time-outs, and postoperative monitoring plans, to achieve the best possible outcomes for their patients with minimal chances of the surgical complications (Javed et al., 2023). Functional differences might arise in any case; functional differences might arise in the performance of the community hospital compared with two other providers, including academic medical centres and small hospitals. Academic medical centres usually have more materials and profiles, which results in cases where the score is high in some domains, like patient outcomes and technology utilization (Hod et al., 2019). Hospital staff in the countryside can experience similar issues due to facilities needing more resources and a workforce shortage that hinders their compliance with infection prevention and patient satisfaction.
NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 Evidence-Based Implementation of Technology
For the Hospital to ensure the LF and Medicare compare scores are improved, there is a need to take up evidence-based informatics tools with quality metrics targeted at medication safety. A computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system should be deployed that combines the features of the clinical decision support functionalities (Connelly & Korvek, 2022). One way would be using the CPOE system to integrate the CDS functionalities. Studies have shown that cases involving Computerized Provider Order Entry systems with Clinical Decision Support Tools (CDS) significantly reduce medication mistakes and improve safety outcomes (Kaushal et al., 2023). Through this technology, the Hospital will introduce a new relationship between physicians and patients, help reduce adverse drug events, and be better evaluated by both Leapfrog and Medicare Compare systems.
A study published in 2024 by Bates et al. noted a 55% reduction in the number of mistakes during medication administration among hospitals that used CPOE with knowledge-based CDS features versus those that used traditional handwritten prescription orders. This finding is a factor that concerns Leapfrog and this Hospital the most among all other things measured with Leapfrog and Medicare Compare. When using CPOE (computerized physician order entry), the system with CDS (clinical decision support) alerts for drug interactions, dosing errors, and allergies, which may help the healthcare provider improve medication safety and minimize potential harm to patients (Sutton & Pincock, 2020).
NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 Using Data to Make Evidence Based Technology Recommendations
Besides Roshanov et al. (2023), researchers found that in most hospitals with CPOE systems, medical errors and medication issues were reduced. This was a clear sign of better medicine administration and reconciliation. Through the evidence of such studies, it is clear to envision the future where informatics can facilitate standardizing medication-related work and thus ensure efficient patient safety (Cortes et al., 2019). Implementation of an in-house CPOE solution that addresses the needs of a local community hospital allows doctors and caregivers to improve medication safety and decision-making. Because of this, providers are more likely to receive better scores on Leapfrog and Medicare Compare surveys.
The Hospital can adopt such practices of evidence-based informatics and technology-driven systems such as CPOE(Computerized provider order entry) with CDS(Clinical decision support) functions to refine medication safety practices and reduce the incidents of adverse events that ultimately result in the improvement of both Leapfrog and Medicare compare scores (Connelly & Korvek, 2022). This suggestion corresponds to the department’s objectives of providing high-quality, safe healthcare. It signifies the institution’s ambition to use technologies to optimize healthcare service delivery through constant improvement.
Rationale for Audiences
Executive-level audiences are busy and need more time. Thus, presentations for this audience should be articulated straightforwardly and succinctly. The structure of the presentation is well balanced, and in light of how the executive-level audience comprises members of the organization, the presentation itself is carrying the message that data-driven decision-making and evidence-based practices should be employed to increase the performance of the healthcare industry (Cakir & Adiguzel, 2020). The design revolves around brief, precise and to-the-point delivery, with main figures and proof-backed advice that reflects the Board’s key factors.
The role of the presidency provides a gateway for individuals with executive appeal to also interact with the public and promote their ideas or agendas. For the CEO and other executives, this presentation gives, among other things, practical cases and proof showing the relevance, in a way, to their points of view (Dwivedi, 2022). The presentation addressed as a storyline with the RCOE proposal presents scientific research supporting CPOE systems with CDS functionalities in preventing medication errors and enhancing patient safety outcomes (Henna Ruutiainen et al., 2024). The presentation will give clear facts and figures on the possible damages to a patient’s welfare and treatment quality. Therefore, this information will capture the organization’s leaders’ attention and support them in understanding the importance of investing in technological solutions.
NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 Using Data to Make Evidence Based Technology Recommendations
The major reason these ethics are done is to better educate the audience regarding the health issues associated with popular fast foods. The examples from the presentation are carefully tailored to touch on what is important to the organization’s executive leaders. They are executives throughout the business who could sign off on this project. Through analysis of the evidence-based ideas on enhancing the Leapfrog scores and the Medicare Compare ratings provided, this presentation will engender trust in the suggested improvements and the following solutions (Smith et al., 2023). It is intended to help executives arrive at conclusions that entail measurable information and recommendations aligned with the organization’s aims and goals. The presentation seeks to foster the C-suite backing and backing for informatics and technology solutions that will develop and improve healthcare care delivery and lead to improved patient outcomes.
Conclusion
In NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 The objective is to emphasize the possibilities and necessity of using evidence-based informatics technology solutions like Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) capabilities to improve medical safety and results. Solutions can push both statistics up through a consistent alignment with the organizational aims and the importance of the two scorecards, with the two scorecards also measuring up well for the provision of high-quality healthcare. With the cooperation and the application of tech, healthcare entities will be able to make positive changes over time and then boost patient experience.
References
Agha-Mir-Salim, L., & Sarmiento, R. F. (2020). Health information technology as premise for data science in global health: A discussion of opportunities and challenges. Leveraging Data Science for Global Health, 6(9), 3–15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47994-7_1
Braun, B. I., Chitavi, S. O., Suzuki, H., Soyemi, C. A., & Puig-Asensio, M. (2020). Culture of safety: Impact on improvement in infection prevention process and outcomes. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 22(12).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-020-00741-y
Cakir, F. S., & Adiguzel, Z. (2020). Analysis of leader effectiveness in organization and knowledge sharing behavior on employees and organization. SAGE Open, 9(4), 1–14. Sagepub.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914634
Connelly, T. P., & Korvek, S. J. (2022). Computer provider order entry (CPOE). Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470273/
Cortes, D., Leung, J., Ryl, A., & Lieu, J. (2019). Pharmacy informatics: Where medication use and technology meet. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 72(4), 320–326.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699873/
Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66(66), 102542. Sciencedirect.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
Haddadin, Y., & Regunath, H. (2022, November 26). Central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI). Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430891/
Henna Ruutiainen, Anna-Riia Holmström, Kunnola, E., & Sini Kuitunen. (2024). Use of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support to prevent dose errors in pediatric medication orders: A systematic review. Pediatric Drugs, 9(5).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-023-00614-6
Hod, R., Maimon, O., & Zimlichman, E. (2019). Measuring the academic value of academic medical centers: Describing a methodology for developing an evaluation model at one academic medical center. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 8(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0334-4
Javed, H., Olanrewaju, O. A., Frank Ansah Owusu, Saleem, A., Peddi Pavani, Tariq, H., Soledad, B., Ram, R., & Giustino Varrassi. (2023). Challenges and solutions in postoperative complications: A narrative review in general surgery. Cureus, 4(8).
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50942
Smith, S. N., Reichert, H. A., Ameling, J. M., & Meddings, J. (2023). Dissecting Leapfrog. Medical Care, 55(6), 606–614.
https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000716
Sutton, R., & Pincock, D. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
Tariq, R. A., & Scherbak, Y. (2023, May 2). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. National Library of Medicine; StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/
Explore this Paper for Comprehensive Insight into the Course:
NURS FPX9901 QualityPerformance Improvement (QIPI) Assessment 2