- PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 Analyzing a Health Problem in Psychology.
Reading a Fitness Problem in Psychology
Substance use amongst more youthful character person men, particularly the ones aged 18 to 20-5, represents a fundamental and complicated public fitness challenge. by the persevering with boom and exchange that takes area at some point of this diploma and the development of the self, in addition to modifications in social and environmental elements, this degree is taken into consideration to be immoderate hazard for the initiation of substance use.
Substance abuse in this precise age bracket has significant implications not only on the health of the customers, their households, and the network but also on society as a whole (Volkow et al., 2021). This paper also examines the complexity of substance use in men, particularly in the context of successful treatment, cultural reviews, and treatment issues, as it challenges the reasons and context of this rising and complicated problem, with the hope of developing better and culturally sensitive strategies to address it.
The Trouble – Substance Use in more youthful grown-up men (age 18–25)
Substance use is a primary public health issue that disproportionately impacts younger individuals, particularly men, in the age range of 18 to 25. So, get this—over 275 million human beings around the sector had been popping tablets final 12 months. Not like, Tic Tacs—actual tablets. Moreover, out of those, more than 36 million folks ended up with drug problems. Wild, right? (Onaolapo et al., 2022). Currently, within America. In the us, the best occurrence of substance use is stated among people between 18 and 25 years of age, including alcohol, marijuana, and prescription drugs.
Youth Substance Use Factors
As in step with the countrywide statistics accumulated in 2018, lifetime substance use amongst young adults was once pretty significant, with 79.7% the use of alcohol, 51.5% the use of hashish, and 55.0% the usage of tobacco, which elements to a excessive exposure to materials within the direction of this developmental degree (Volkow et al., 2021). This degree of lifestyles is influenced by techniques of hsignificanteaving home, such as pursuing training or education and forming social connections, which may contribute to vulnerability. Many younger guys flip to materials to cope with strain, peer stress, mental fitness, traumatic conditions, or really for social reputation, which often escalates into dependency or dependence over the years.
Younger men and women are at a higher risk of substance misuse as a result of factors that include discrimination, limited access to mental health services, and high unemployment rates in the African American and Hispanic populations. The delivery of medication appears to be higher in urban settings, whereas rural settings pose factors such as a loss of social interaction and fewer healthcare facilities. Most affected are individuals from lower- to middle-income backgrounds, many of whom lack access to normal family resources or have limited opportunities for preventive training and intervention services (Hayek et al., 2024). Substance use in this population has numerous terrible impacts on their lives in terms of education, crime issues, fitness, and potential.
Outcomes of Allowing Substance Use to Hold amongst Younger Men
If left unaddressed, substance use amongst younger adult men can bring about a cascade of terrible effects that affect human beings, households, and corporations. Consequently, the consistent use of materials places this population susceptible to growing numerous long-term health complications, including liver illnesses, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory illnesses, and neurological problems. Mental fitness is likewise impaired, mainly via despair, tension, and suicidal tendencies, which are also more common among substance users (Armoon et al., 2021). The human intelligence, being in a developmental stage until the mid-twenties, is most inclined towards this degree in their lives.
Substance abuse for a prolonged duration impacts someone’s cognitive competencies, decision-making techniques, and strength of mind, which can be integral to human improvement and decreases their capability to avoid risk-taking, which includes having unprotected sex, using drugs, or engaging in criminal activities. From a social and economic mindset, persistent substance use negatively impacts training and employment continuity. Young men in this age bracket are among the most vulnerable in society, as they often drop out of university or fail to maintain regular employment due to poor attendance, subpar academic performance, or run-ins with the law (Paul et al., 2024).
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 Analyzing a Health Problem in Psychology
Those result in a life of poverty, reliance on public assistance, and involvement in the justice system. Own family dynamics may also decline, resulting in families becoming estranged from one another, losing faith, or experiencing worry and emotional struggles. Residents of these agencies are being forced to pay higher crime fees, endure inadequate healthcare facilities, and receive limited help offerings. Except for centred interventions, the capability of a technology among younger people can be stunted, resulting in long-term societal losses in both productivity and human potential.
It additionally perpetuates stigma and inequity in treatment access if it is still neglected. Younger character men no longer look for help owing to cultural norms of masculinity, stigma, or lack of information about treatment. This reluctance continues the cycle of abuse, further delaying the time we are searching for assistance and recuperation, to the possibility of neglecting prevention and the effects of early intervention in the supervision of health and justice (Camengasystemmer, 2022). With the beneficial resource of failing to act, society no longer genuinely accepts the problem persisting as it persists,, but inadvertently reinforces the restrictions that prevent younger men from receiving the assistance they need. The results are not instant but can extend some distance into maturity, affecting fitness, social integration, and the quality of life.
Analyzing the Connection between Theory and the Problem
The Biopsychosocial model offers a whole framework for the perception of substance use amongst younger adult males by integrating biological, cognitive, and social dimensions. Biologically, this populace also can have a genetic predisposition to dependence, with some human beings having neurochemical imbalances or a family history of substance use. Psychologically, tendencies that consist of impulsivity, low self-esteem, or untreated mental health conditions like depression and anxiety increase susceptibility to substance misuse.
Socially, extra youthful guys are regularly influenced by environments characterised by poverty, volatile family dynamics, and neighborhood violence, all of which can also normalise or perhaps encourage drug use (Buckner et al., 2021). The interaction of those couple of factors explains why, in truth, addressing one detail, together with access to capsules, is not enough to save you or lessen substance use. This notion highlights the complexity of dependence and underlines the need for a multifaceted technique in both prevention and treatment efforts. Bandura’s social learning theory similarly clarifies how substance use behaviour is placed and reinforced through observation and imitation (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). Specifically, more young character men are encouraged to engage in hassle via the usage of buddies, media images, and family members who immediately and indirectly promote substance use as suitable and acceptable conduct.
Understanding Youth Substance Influences
While drug use is plain or promoted, people can also start perceiving substances as everyday, helpful in managing stress, or as a sign of maturity. Reinforcement runs the show. At the same time, as someone observes others gaining satisfaction, social fame, or escape through drug use, they are much more likely to replicate that conduct (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). That is even greater, as is the case at some unspecified time in the development of maturity, when identity is strong, and the opinions of various individuals are particularly valued. Consistent with social learning theory, there may be a need to change the social context and avoid ordinary exposure to negative feature models.
Collectively, the Biopsychosocial model and Social reading precept offer an entire framework for appreciating substance use amongst young men. The Biopsychosocial model basically says, “Hey, substance use is not just about one thing—it is a messy cocktail of your genes, your brain, your life, and the people you hang around with.” Maybe your family tree has some roots tangled up in addiction.
You may have had a rough time, or you may never have learned how to deal with life’s challenges. Alternatively, your friends are constantly dragging you into sketchy situations. The point is, it is not just one reason, iss all of it mashed together that makes this model pretty awesome, honestly. I do not try to shove everyone into one box. It gets that humans are complicated as hell. However, a functionality drawback is that its massive scope may also make it challenging to pinpoint precise intervention goals.
Integrated Theories of Addiction
In evaluation, the Social learning precept posits that substance use is typically a learned behavior, acquired through observation, imitation, and reinforcement, often influenced by family, peers, and media (Buckner et al., 2021). This thought’s electricity lies in its emphasis on the social surroundings and conduct styles that preserve substance use, making it particularly useful for behavioural interventions. Its vulnerable point, however, is that it could underemphasize the natural and intellectual underpinnings of addiction. Even as in assessment, every theory highlights the significance of environmental and social effects; however, they diverge in their central interest.
The Biopsychosocial model has its fingers in every pie—brains, bodies, social circles, you name it. It looks at pretty much everything going on inside and outside a person. On the other hand, the social mastery concept is quite laser-focused on what people do in front of others and how they pick up on things by watching and receiving rewards (or not). Put these two together, and suddenly you are not just looking at substance use through a keyhole; you are swinging the door wide open. That is how you end up with all sorts of ways to help, from classic therapy sessions and finding a good mentor, all the way up to shaking things up at a policy level—like, actually trying to fix the bigger money and class problems that push folks toward this stuff in the first place.
Synthesis of Existing Research on Substance Use
The reviewed literature offers a wide range of findings regarding the motives, outcomes, and treatments of substance use, imparting valuable insights into the cognitive, intellectual, social, and behavioural dimensions of the problem. In their paper, Balandeh et al. (2021) referred to 1/3 wave cognitive behavioural therapy choices, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT). They talked about how each of these treatment plans inspired emotional law and intellectual flexibility, which are two critical aspects of the healing from first-rate kinds of addiction.
So, Bayır and Aylaz (2020) essentially explored the concept of mindfulness-based education. Turns out, when people started thinking more about their own self-efficacy—like actually believing they could change their habits—they got way better at shaking off substance use. The studies suggest that interventions centered on affective and cognitive additives may be very beneficial. On the flip side, Hoffmann and Jones (2020) essentially highlighted external factors—such as hello, all those stressful memories piling up for kids? Yeah, that kind of pressure just pushes them toward using substances. Each of the studies suggests that substance use and abuse are not attributed to only one reason; however, they are a multifaceted issue influenced by intrapersonal and environmental factors.
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 Analyzing a Health Problem in Psychology
Research findings moreover show variability over time of populations and highlight how demographic variations have an impact on substance use patterns. Artamendi and the crew (2021). They kind of dug into that whole gender thing with teens and mental health— Guess what? Girls leaned more towards depression and anxiety, while the guys showed up with more conduct problems. Not super surprising if you have ever been to high school, but it is good to have the receipts. Those variations are pretty important if one needs to plan interventions to assist younger individuals. Koehler (2021) further advanced the dimensions with the aid of a method of exploring the relationship between substance use and violent extremism in toddlers and firmly anchored trauma on account of the Reality of the high-level detail.
At the same time, Koehler (2021) observed a qualitative, theoretical approach, and Artamendi et al. (2021) accrued large-scale survey data, which suggests a difference in the method of labour. Even though they each support the hypothesis that untreated highbrow health problems increase the risk of substance use. Nawi et al. (2021) sponsored this study by reviewing the hazard and shielding factors among toddlers. They discovered that socio-economic trouble, loss of parental care, and impact from friends are the main reasons for drug abuse amongst youths. This aligns with the findings from Hoffmann and Jones (2020), despite Nawi’s (2021) study standing out for its broader scope and synthesis of global records.
Comparative Research Methodologies Analysis
While comparing the study techniques, a clear model emerges in terms of plan and rigour. Balandeh et al. (2021) and Koehler (2021) relied on narrative critiques and theoretical discussions, imparting sizeable conceptual insights but missing statistical evaluation. In their assessment, Bayır and Aylaz (2020) employed a quasi-experimental method, yielding measurable results that enhanced the validity of their conclusions. Hoffmann and Jones (2020) employed literature evaluation techniques similar to those used in systematic reviews, but focused on key factors. Hoffmann and Jones (2020) focused on raising doubts about the findings in the U.S., at the same time as Nawi et al. (2021) provided an evaluation of a global thinking setting.
Artamendi et al. (2021) employed a flow into-sectional survey design and statistical analyses, which provided beneficial demographic descriptions. Honestly, the articles throw a ton of stats at you, making it pretty clear—yeah, stuff like self-confidence and mental toughness matter when it comes to substance use, but let us not forget the big, messy stuff happening around people, too. Stuff like environmental stress, old baggage, or even your crew can mess you up way more than people admit. So, if we are going to talk fixes, forget cookie-cutter answers. You have to mix it up, pay attention, and actually hear what different folks—especially Gen Z and the younger crowd—are saying they want.
Cultural Troubles
In the research reviewed, cultural issues had been stated to numerous tiers, with a few studies explicitly addressing the role of cultural norms, beliefs, and societal systems in shaping substance use behaviours. For instance, inside the systematic evaluation carried out through the use of Nawi et al. (2021), they stated how cultural shame, spiritual values, and expectancies from the circle of relatives have an effect on drug abuse and drug use in collectivist cultures, in which substance use results in accelerated social isolation.
Likewise, it is essential to be aware that Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, with its focus on behaviours acquired through observation of cultural context (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). This concept affirms that a few cultures could encourage substance use in their own family or amongst friends, making it seem perfect, whilst in others, it seemed abhorrent. Those findings suggest that it is essential to consider cultural factors and ensure that the techniques used to save you, like those used to address illnesses, are culturally appropriate.
Cultural Gaps in Research
Yes, even with all those supposed strengths, there are still some glaring holes and inconsistencies when it comes to actually incorporating cultural aspects into research or theory. You would think we would have figured it out by now, but nope—there is still a lot that just does not add up. Several of the analysed studies, which incorporated cognitive-behavioural treatment evaluations, did not consider standard highbrow techniques and did not include cultural elements in their conclusions (Zamboni et al., 2021). This has restricted the generalisation of such interventions to high-quality population companies, especially when there may be models in cultural beliefs regarding intellectual fitness and substance use and their management.
Furthermore, most studies were completed in Western contexts, which may have overlooked culturally specific chance factors, coping strategies, and resource systems observed in non-Western societies. The essential predicament for modern-day substance use research and theory is the lack of culturally diverse samples and contextualised studies. Those obstacles need to be addressed and mitigated to introduce extra culturally sensitive and characteristic techniques in the prevention and treatment of substance abuse.
Ethical Consideration
One key moral interest in addressing substance use is confidentiality, as stated in APA Ethical Principles 4.01 (preserving Confidentiality) (Smart et al., 2024). Psychologists want to defend their clients by protecting any private records disclosed in the course of treatment, and they are required to do so without informed consent. This is especially the case for parents who are relying on substances and who might not need others to recognize this or face the regulation or social backlash for their substance use.
Confidentiality allows clients to experience vulnerability and satisfaction in sharing their thoughts without fear that this information will be disclosed. For example, a younger male person is hesitant to seek help as a result of fear of being categorized or judged by friends or employers, and can also experience extra satisfaction in disclosing substance use in a setting where strict confidentiality is ensured. Psychologists should be vigilant in upholding this principle, specifically while going for walks with vulnerable populations who already face sizeable barriers to having access to care.
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 Analyzing a Health Problem in Psychology
Every different indispensable ethical requirement is Competence, as defined in APA moral favoured two—01 (boundaries of Competence) (Mette & Rowan, 2024). Psychologists must work within their areas of schooling and perception and are searching for extra education or supervision while working with problems such as addiction, trauma, or co-occurring intellectual health issues.
More youthful guys have an excessive incidence of substance use, and that is associated with many highbrow fitness and social factors, including depression, anxiety, peer pressure, and poverty. It is because of this that practitioners need to approach their conditions with a fantastic degree of grasp and finesse. For example, suppose a psychologist identifies that a client has substance use, which is related to unaddressed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or cultural prejudice. In that case, they are required, through their ethical code, to seek recommendations from or document the client to an expert. This self-control-to-competence enables the integration of practical and moral training into care delivery, enhancing effective treatment and healing while reducing harm.
Conclusion
Substance use among more youthful adult men is a multifaceted problem rooted in intellectual, social, and environmental factors, as explored through numerous theories and study findings. This paper describes the prevalence and causes of the trouble, the outcomes of not treating the illness, the roles of biopsychosocial and social learning theories, and a meta-evaluation of peer-reviewed articles regarding treatment techniques, demographics, and factors contributing to the disease.
We also took a hard look at the cultural and ethical side of things—because let us be real, you cannot just slap a one-size-fits-all solution on substance use and call it a day. Sorting this out is not just about helping people stuck in limbo; it is about stopping the ripple effect. Think: hospitals jammed up, families getting torn apart, people missing work. It is a mess if you let it slide. Key measures of achievement for a destiny answer include reduced relapse expenses, improved mental and physical health outcomes, enhanced treatment engagement, and more effective network-based functional resource systems. Spotting and tackling the best interests of more young individuals, grown-up men struggling with substance use, is an imperative step in the path of long-term healing and societal well-being.
Explore in-depth strategies and solutions for substance use challenges in PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 3 to enhance your academic success.