- PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 3 Proposing a Solution to the Problem.
Proposing a Solution to a Problem
They have an observation that focuses on substance use among young males aged 18 to twenty-5 years, which is becoming a problem in society and has many consequences in the lives of these young people. This is due to subsequent factors, such as a degree of improvement, identity, independence, and social pressure, which affect unstable behaviours related to substance misuse. This paper is all about digging into why people here are using substances—what is driving it, what is being done about it right now (spoiler: some of it is outdated), and dreaming up a better plan that works. We are talking real prevention and treatment stuff, not just hand-wavy “awareness campaigns.” The goal? Help folks kick the habit, dodge the pitfalls, and get their lives back on track. No sugarcoating, just straight-up, practical ideas.
Chemical Dependency in Adults
Chemical misuse, in particular those aged 18 to 20-five, remains a pressing and complicated public health issue. This developmental stage is characterized by a series of vital developmental transitions/transitional developmental responsibilities, including an increase in independence, the development of identity, and exposure to new social contexts, which in turn makes them more susceptible to Chemical Dependency in Males Younger adult grown-ups are at a higher risk of substance abuse than other age groups, considering their biology, psychological factors and social environment, encompassing risk‑taking behaviors and coping strategies.
In this population, chemical misuse results in terrible repercussions for their physical and intellectual well-being, family, university, work, and social relationships, as well as productivity (Volkow et al., 2021). The countrywide epidemiological records of 2018 indicated that lifetime chemical misuse amongst young adults was as high as 79.7% for alcohol, 51.5% cannabis, and 55.0 % tobacco (Onaolapo et al., 2022). The report names the need to format and implement particular strategies that cope with substance abuse risk factors among this population.
Strategies for Substance Recovery
A brief literature review suggests that numerous elements and strategies contribute to chemical misuse in contemporary society. Balandeh et al. (2021) reviewed the first three waves of cognitive behavioural treatment, including ACT and DBT, discussing how these recovery strategies might also be effective in enhancing intellectual flexibility and emotional regulation, both of which can be proactive elements in recovery from dependence.
In addition, Bayır and Aylaz (2020) reported on a mindfulness-based education software that enhanced self-efficacy thoughts, resulting in a significant improvement in individuals’ self-trust in coping with or limiting chemical misuse. Consequently, government features and emotional law abilities can be considered key components of the restoration and prevention approach. However, Hoffmann and Jones (2020) emerged as the focal point of environmental and psychosocial stressors, which incorporate adverse adolescent evaluations and trauma, because they are the most significant risk factors for chemical misuse.
Gendered, Cultural Substance Influences
Growing on the highbrow and social additives, Artamendi et al. (2021) tested gender-particular highbrow fitness comorbidities, noting that grown-up adult guys usually tend to reveal off conduct issues that might beautify substance use, at the identical time as girls are more likely to experience anxiety and depression. This gender awareness is essential for developing gender-sensitive approaches. Koehler (2021) then brought a current perspective to chemical misuse in more youthful human beings, wherein the trauma and marginalisation can cause violent extremism. This highlights the impact of intellectual injuries on the broader community, particularly when they are left unaddressed. Nawi et al. (2021) took an entire view, identifying socioeconomic trouble, peer strain, and lack of parental supervision as the number one predictors of drug abuse among younger individuals.
In the long run, cultural and moral implications are also integral within the use of materials with the aid of the methods of younger character guys. Socio-culturally, chemical misuse can be expected in a few peer organisations or may be a stop-end result of male gender norms that do not permit looking for assistance or being willing (Williamson, 2020). This is a result of the battle of hobbies, wherein individual independence collides with public health policies, particularly in issues related to mandatory treatment, damage reduction fees, and health equity. The disgrace and embarrassment that accompany substance use and intellectual fitness troubles are some unique hassle to seeking early remedy and beneficial resources for the cause that many younger guys do not need to be classified as frail or powerless. For this reason, culturally responsive and ethically sound strategies should prioritise empathy, non-judgmental manual, and inclusion in treatment planning.
Proposed Solution to Address Chemical Misuse in Young Adult Males
An effective way to address chemical misuse amongst young men or women requires a multi-dimensional, integrative approach that addresses everyone and societal elements. At an individual diploma, as defined with the valuable resource of Balandeh et al. (2021), trauma-targeted cognitive-behavioural treatment, collectively with ACT and DBT, can enhance mastery and splendour, intellectual flexibility, and emotional regulation, which might help ward off chemical misuse relapse. Collectively, mindfulness-based interventions can offer humans self-focus, the potential to govern cravings, and self-efficacy in their ability to change (Bayır & Aylaz, 2020).
The ones recuperation techniques are most effective when used with younger male sufferers owing to issues regarding identification, protection of feelings, and peer pressure. For instance, Motivational Interviewing is designed to engage younger adult males who may not be motivated for change through talk alone, except for complaints. You know, when it comes to actually getting better and staying on track in the US, nothing beats legit counselling that’s tailored to you—and yeah, those regular check-ins? Quite crucial. It is not just a quick fix; it sticks.
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 3 Proposing a Solution to the Problem
However, zooming out a bit, the whole system needs a shake-up. We are talking insurance covering more stuff, real support networks (not just those half-hearted pamphlets in waiting rooms), and tackling the root causes that push people toward substance use in the first place. Why not weave real mental health education into college classes instead of another boring general education course? Moreover, make advanced health services available to students from all backgrounds, not just the ones who already know how to game the system.
Oh, and let us be real—so much of the stigma hits men the hardest. Time for campaigns that actually show dudes it is normal to reach out. Put some relatable, no-BS role models front and centre, showing that dealing with your stuff is not weak. That is how you start to crack the whole “suffer in silence” nonsense.
In this regard, at the insurance level, governments need to increase funding for services supporting the dependency needs of younger people, address socioeconomic determinants as described by Nawi et al. (2021), and adopt harm reduction techniques that focus on health rather than repression. For example, needle-exchange programs, legalising chemical misuse for non-violent crimes, and employment readiness packages for drug clients have had many successes in many countries. As a preventive measure, this solution framework will help reduce the incidence of substance use in younger adults by addressing intellectual aspects of individuals, in addition to structural elements that may be present in society.
Theoretical Support for the Solution
The Biopsychosocial model is a comprehensive framework for understanding an individual’s experience of chemical misuse, as well as the potential for intervention, as it encompasses biological, psychological, and social elements. It states that young men and women are at risk due to neurodevelopmental factors, emotional states, and environmental influences (Buckner et al., 2021). This model estimates the very last results of trauma-targeted cognitive-behavioural remedies, collectively with ACT and DBT, with emphasis on the Reality that addiction is not only a behavioural problem, but a structural problem (Balandeh et al., 2021).
The biopsychosocial model corresponds to the person elements of the proposed solution which are the treatment plans associated with the law of feelings, the formation of a topic identity, and the presence of a coexisting intellectual illness. as an example, the theories like mindfulness primarily based entirely indeed interventions with people in shape with this concept due to the fact they enhance mental electricity and recognize the natural pressure response with one among a kind variables like trauma or peer pressure.
In line with Bandura’s social learning theory, chemical misuse behaviours are learned through modelling, imitation, and reinforcement (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). These behaviours are observed in friends, family, or media personalities with whom the young individual interacts and is influenced by, even when those behaviours are reinforcing or as the younger individual witnesses them in their social surroundings. Bandura furthermore stresses that conduct can be changed for the better through the influence of mentors, network leaders, or friends. This precept underpins the societal-level interventions within the proposed solution, including the use of mentors and buddies, as well as promoting a reputation for seasoned social behaviours (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). Bandura, moreover, emphasised the concept of self-efficacy, which aligns with findings from Bayır and Aylaz (2020), indicating that developing self-efficacy in one’s ability to resist substance use has been a key outcome of successful interventions.
Comparing Two Theoretical Frameworks
At the same time, the Biopsychosocial model is broader and able to consider both internal and external factors, allowing for individualised interventions. It has the advantage of being flexible enough to be tailored to meet clinicians’ needs when selecting strategies for addressing not only emotional issues but also environmental stress factors (Buckner et al., 2021). However, it has a weak spot in that it does not expound on how a behaviour is learned or unlearned, and this is where Bandura is to be found. In comparison to the social learning of precepts, it is behaviourist in its approach and has clear plans of exchange through the use of a model and reinforcements (Hahlbeck & Vito, 2021). Its essential hassle is that it may forget deeper mental or natural elements that contribute to addiction and relapse.
Both of these theories supplement each other in an additive manner to provide an explanation for and possibly deal with substance abuse among young adult men. The biopsychosocial model identifies various factors that increase the risk of chemical misuse and the underlying motives. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory explains that behaviours are learned and modified through a combination of learning factors and environmental influences. Their integration enables the solution at all levels and societal degrees, combining recovery and network-based strategies to promote recovery and resilience.
Research: Synthesising Solutions for Substance Abuse Among Young Adult Males
As for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the proposed solutions to govern substance abuse in younger men or women, several studies indicated that intellectual, environmental, and social strategies are quintessential. Studies have furthermore shown that conformist intellectual remedies, such as CBT and mindfulness, are beneficial resources in developing a person’s emotional regulation, which may enhance their autonomy and self-worth through a proactive restoration approach. In line with Balandeh et al. (2021), 0.33-wave CBT treatments, such as ACT and DBT, are critical due to issues with emotional regulation or cognitive flexibility. These healing models moreover take into consideration the truth that dependence is not just a cognitive ailment but moreover an emotional and behavioural one that enables human beings to discover ways to deal with the stressors that lead to substance use effectively.
According to those studies, using mindfulness-based remedies has also produced exceptional outcomes. A study by Bayır and Aylaz (2020) utilised the concept of self-efficacy in conjunction with mindfulness-based education, revealing that individuals can enhance their self-control over chemical misuse. Meditation helps people focus on what occupies their thoughts, so they no longer need substances to escape Reality. Therefore, this research shows that such interventions, which might be targeted at self-reputation and emotional regulation, can save you from relapse and assist younger individuals who are beyond stress pushed by impulse and/or terrible emotions. The findings of this study are consistent with the proposed solution of providing intellectual healing strategies to enhance coping capabilities and self-regulatory mechanisms in individuals at high risk.
Holistic Youth Addiction Intervention
Moreover, environmental and sociocultural factors play a significant role in the development of substance abuse troubles amongst young male individuals. Hoffmann and Jones (2020) referred to the fact that trauma exposure and strain accumulation during the formative years are necessary precursors to substance use. Their work argues that many issues must be addressed on my part, and the idea of factors on the issue of peer strain, socio-financial demanding situations, and the shortage of parenting in substance abuse. Nawi et al. (2021) furthermore supported those findings through the method of bringing up that outside elements are quintessential to deal with, as a result of Reality, for instance, loss of parental support and peer stress are the primary reasons for substance use.
The outdoor factors advocate that treatment need not absolutely be based on individual psychotherapy, but also community-based, because the Reality stress is brought on by elements in the environment. So, the answer in the table—mixing community-based stuff, real-deal mentorship, and trauma-informed care—actually lines up with what the research says. Basically, it is all about helping people deal with outside pressure (which, let us be real, is everywhere). Moreover, if you look at Artamendi et al. (2021) and Koehler (2021), they both hammer home the point: you have got to actually understand who these young adults are, where they come from, what they are dealing with in their day-to-day, all that demographic and socioeconomic jazz. Otherwise? You are just guessing.
PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 3 Proposing a Solution to the Problem
Artamendi et al. (2021 used gender versions and comorbid intellectual health infection to indicate that whilst male substance use includes behaviour and violence, there may be a need for separate interventions. This has highlighted the need to encompass gender in the prevention and treatment of substance use regarding despair and distinct intellectual health-related topics. Koehler (2021) furthermore referred to the need for addressing intellectual trauma that results in substance use and the correlation between the use of materials and violent extremism. Those findings spotlight the multifaceted nature of dependence and help inform the improvement of complete treatment plans that combine mental counselling, trauma-informed practices, and community-based support interventions.
Collectively, the six studies published in the six peer-reviewed articles display that the effective remedy for substance use disorders in younger male customers lies within the aggregate of cognitive-behavioural therapies, mindfulness practices, and community-based techniques. On account of this, the proposed solution for tackling substance dependency is primarily based on inner mental elements and outside environmental factors, which could be evidence-based, and is predicted to have a significant impact in reducing substance use and inspiring long-term healing amongst people in this organisation.
Cultural Troubles in Imposing Solutions for Substance Abuse
While enforcing solutions for substance abuse amongst younger adult men, cultural considerations play a pivotal role in ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention. Lifestyle performs a central role within the grasp of substance use and recovery; as such, cultural ideals and values need to be taken into consideration by the walking professional while coping with the client. For example, a few societies reflect on the consideration of it as shameful to seek treatment for intellectual infection or substance use issues, which discourages them from seeking a remedy.
Collectivism can emphasize the importance of the circle of relatives and social network, and this may influence an individual’s willingness to come forward and report instances of substance use or seek help (Ma et al., 2024). Consequently, highbrow fitness specialists want to be aware of such social elements and ensure that they embody the above cultural values, and must no longer dictate the treatment. Offering unique community counselling and peer support programs that emphasise communal resources, in contrast to individual-centred therapy, can help mitigate these worrying conditions.
Cultural Approaches in Recovery
A few other cultural interests are that coping measures furthermore range from one lifestyle to three specific lifestyles. For example, some cultures may also rely on trust and community-based strategies in addressing intellectual and substance use problems, in conjunction with shamanism or non-secular channels (Urrutia et al., 2023). It is miles, therefore, essential to use those coping techniques within the treatment plan, as this may help in making sure that the answer being provided is embraced.
As an instance, if substance use treatment has included mindfulness interventions, which might be powerful, culturally specific interventions,collectively with meditation or prayer, may be used owing to the fact that they are probably acquainted with those cultures. You have got to rope in the whole crew—family, friends, then the neighbour who always brings over food—everyone. That is just how it works in lots of cultures, you know? Community is not just a nice bonus; it is the backbone. If you skip out on that, good luck getting people on board for the long haul (Urrutia et al., 2023). When professionals actually pay attention to what matters to folks—their values, their ways of doing things—stuff just clicks better. People show up, stick around, and, honestly, the whole recovery thing stands a way better chance of actually working out.
Ethical Troubles in Imposing Solutions for Substance Abuse
Alright, so here is the real deal: when you are working with folks dealing with substance abuse, you have got to play by some serious ethical ground rules. Not just because it is the right thing, but because let us be honest—no one wants to get called out for being a shady professional (Wickremsinhe, 2025). The absolute top dog among these moral codes? Autonomy. Yeah, that is the frilly technique of saying humans get to call the pix about their very personal remedy.
So, what does that, without a doubt, appear like? Essentially, if a person is in a treatment program, they want to, without a doubt, recognise why they are there, what they may want to omit through proper, what may additionally flow into sideways, and—massive one—they should never experience like they are being railroaded into some issue. They need to be in at the selection, not clearly dragged alongside for the journey. Real speak: knowledgeable consent is not just a signature on a form; it is far more than being earlier and no longer sneaky.
Ethics in Addiction Treatment
Moreover, hey, if someone decides they want to bail? Unless they are a danger to themselves or others, that is their choice. Treating people like they have a say in their own lives? That is how you make sure it is a team effort, not some boot camp. No forced stuff, no power trips—just respect and actual empowerment (Wickremsinhe, 2025). Every specific quintessential moral requirement is beneficence, which includes experts taking moves that advantage the people they serve (Wickremsinhe, 2025).
Within the context of substance abuse treatment, this means that the treatment plan should not only encompass empirically supported treatments, but also consider the well-being of the customer. For example, an intervention needs to be designed for younger male or female clients, taking into account their anatomy, intellectual abilities, and social recognition. Specialists must, moreover, refrain from any interaction that could hurt clients; this is consistent with the principle of non-maleficence (meaning not to cause harm).
With the valuable resource of prioritising beneficence, specialists ensure that their efforts lead to the path of restoration and the well-being of the individual, and they do not support practices that may worsen the situation, including adopting stigmatising or coercive measures (Wickremsinhe, 2025). Those ethical considerations enable healthcare specialists to provide support that is both supportive and dignifying to the subjects, and their interventions aim to help them achieve sustainable recovery.
Limitations
At the same time, the proposed solution of the use of CBT, mindfulness-based interventions, and socio-environmental techniques holds promise for addressing substance use among young adults, but it also has barriers. One of the essential weaknesses is the difficulty of proper, beneficial resource allocation and time management, which is necessary for every healthcare professional and patient.
First, CBT involves working with skilled therapists and following a few instructions, which may not be readily available, particularly in rural settings or for individuals with low incomes. Furthermore, despite the Reality that mindfulness-based interventions are beneficial, their efficacy presupposes the readiness and willingness of a patient to exercise and incorporate those strategies, which is likely to be challenging in the case of severe SUDs. Each Catch-22 scenario is a challenge to the environment that can encompass peer pressure, social status, and family troubles that are not easily reformed or cannot be frequently changed within a short period.
Implications and Consequences
The results and consequences of enforcing the proposed solution for addressing substance use amongst young adults are multifaceted. On a terrific note, the mixture of CBT, mindfulness, and socio-environmental methods may pave the way to advanced intellectual fitness, emotional management, and sustained recovery from Substance Use issues. It has been established that CBT helps individuals transition from negative to more positive cognitive strategies, while mindfulness, in turn, reduces the risk of relapse (Bayır & Aylaz, 2020).
However, there are potential consequences, primarily associated with the accessibility and scalability of those interventions. The need for informed experts to deliver CBT and mindfulness-based interventions genuinely in Reality means that beneficial, resource-limited settings may also face challenging conditions in imparting those services. Moreover, those strategies entail a nice degree of dedication from the people who will not be able to build up with others, especially those in early recovery levels or people with excessive substance dependence. At the societal stage, the answer could be beneficial in controlling the healthcare expenses related to substance use issues. However, its efficacy is likely constrained by the limited resources available, including stigma, data loss, and inadequate community support structures.
Conclusions
Substance use among more youthful character person adult males, in particular those aged 18 to twenty-five, presents a significant public health issue due to its multifactorial causes, including mental, social, and environmental factors. The remedy graph that has been proposed to encompass CBT, mindfulness techniques, and structured help appears to be the most effective approach to address substance use disorder because it targets the inner and external reasons of chemical misuse. This method is designed to decorate emotional manipulation, enhance vanity, and decrease the chance of relapse.
However, its implementation comes with vast dangers, specifically in terms of gaining the proper access to resources, their availability, and partial human participation in the specific therapeutic levels, despite the fact that several social elements, such as stigma and a loss of grasp, may act as obstacles to the implementation of these interventions. Notwithstanding those challenges, the technique holds promise for lowering substance use, enhancing intellectual health results, and helping long-term healing, provided that those risks are cautiously controlled via targeted interventions and sufficient resources.
Explore in-depth analysis strategies in PSYC FPX 4900 Assessment 2 to better understand psychological health challenges.
References
- https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.297
- https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v13i1.298
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151354