NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment FREE DOWNLOAD
Concept Map
Primary Diagnosis: “Myocardial Infarction”Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?
| Pathophysiology of Primary Diagnosis | |
| Myocardial infarction (MI) also known as heart attack is a condition in which blood supply via the coronary arteries to a part of the heart is severely restricted or occluded. This is mostly due to atherosclerosis which is the deposition of fatty material (plaques) in the coronary arteries (Ewelina Młynarska et al., 2024). This clot may block the flow of oxygen to the coronary arteries, leading to cell death in the heart muscles. There can be severe complications to the heart, including damage to the actual muscle and reduced capability of the heart to pump blood if this is left untreated. | |
| Causes | Risk Factors (genetic/ethnic/physical) |
| The leading factors contributing to MI involve plaque formation, blood clot formation within the coronary arteries, and spasms of the arteries that reduce blood circulation (Takahashi et al., 2023). | It is possible to make the differentiation of factors leading to myocardial infarction by genetic, ethnic, and physical criteria.
|
What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?
| Signs and Symptoms – Common presentation | How does the diagnosis impact each body system? Complications? |
| Signs: Chest pain or discomfort is the cardinal manifestation of myocardial infarction and patients may describe it as pressure, squeezing, or tightness, which may extend to the arm, back, neck, or jaw.Symptoms: Other symptoms include breathlessness, loss of appetite, vomiting, sweating, dizziness, and tiredness. Women can present atypical manifestations such as abdominal pain or some sort of malaise (Barone Gibbs et al., 2021). | Circulatory: Less blood pumped to the circulatory system and possibility of developing arrhythmias because of heart tissue death.Pulmonary: This condition may occur when pulmonary circulation is overwhelmed by excess fluids as a result of heart failure.Renal: The following are effects of a low kidney perfusion; Renal function is hindered due to low peripheral perfusion as the blood flow to the kidneys decreases due to the latter.Complications: The adverse effects of MI include heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and occasionally death (Yang et al., 2021). |
What are other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis (differentials)?
| Other possibilities of a differential diagnosis may include stable angina which is chest discomfort without cell death, pulmonary embolism where a clot forms in the lungs and pericarditis where the fluid sac surrounding the heart becomes swollen (Yang et al., 2021). |
What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?
| Diagnostic evaluation often includes an ECG test to assess arrhythmias and verify the presence of an MI. In addition to the analysis of blood samples for elevated levels of cardiac biomarkers such as troponin (Boeddinghaus et al., 2020). Coronary angiography is used to visualize any blockages within the coronary arteries in the heart, and an echocardiogram may be used to determine the function of the heart. |
What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.
| Antiplatelet therapy focuses on the reversal of flow reduction and improving the function of blood vessels in the heart. This may include aspirin to prevent blood clotting, beta-blockers to decrease the demands placed on the heart, ACE inhibitors to reduce blood pressure, and statins to control cholesterol (Boeddinghaus et al., 2020). In other circumstances, the patient may require angioplasty or a bypass operation. Some patients are often discharged to the cardiologist for maintenance and may need to participate in cardiac rehabilitation services to aid in recovery and or prevent such incidences in the future. |
Instructions To Write NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment
Need instructions for this assessment? Contact us now and get expert guidance right away!
Instructions File For 6501 Week 3 Assignment
CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.
myocardial infarction
endocarditis
myocarditis
valvular disorders
lipid panels
coagulation
clotting cascade
deep vein thrombosis
hypertension
heart failure
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3
Submit your MindMap Template by Day 7 of Week 3.
6501 Week 3 Assignment Rubric
NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric
1) Select one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap Template. Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?
| Criteria | Description | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 20 to >17.0 Pts Excellent | A thoroughly completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis. | 20 pts |
| 17 to >14.0 Pts Good | A completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis. | 17 pts |
| 14 to >12.0 Pts Fair | An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis. | 14 pts |
| 12 to >0 Pts Poor | An incomplete MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis, or is missing. | 12 pts |
2) What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?
| Criteria | Description | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 20 to >17.0 Pts Excellent | The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. | 20 pts |
| 17 to >14.0 Pts Good | The response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. | 17 pts |
| 14 to >12.0 Pts Fair | The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. | 14 pts |
| 12 to >0 Pts Poor | The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing. | 12 pts |
3) What are other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis (differentials)?
| Criteria | Description | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 20 to >17.0 Pts Excellent | The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis. | 20 pts |
| 17 to >14.0 Pts Good | The response accurately describes other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis. | 17 pts |
| 14 to >12.0 Pts Fair | The response inaccurately or vaguely describes other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis. | 14 pts |
| 12 to >0 Pts Poor | The response inaccurately and vaguely describes other potential diagnoses that present similarly to this diagnosis, or is missing. | 12 pts |
4) What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?
| Criteria | Description | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 20 to >17.0 Pts Excellent | The response thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis. | 20 pts |
| 17 to >14.0 Pts Good | The response accurately describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis. | 17 pts |
| 14 to >12.0 Pts Fair | The response vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis. | 14 pts |
| 12 to >0 Pts Poor | The response vaguely describes the potential diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis, or is missing. | 12 pts |
5) What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.
| Criteria | Description | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 20 to >17.0 Pts Excellent | The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications. | 20 pts |
| 17 to >14.0 Pts Good | The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications. | 17 pts |
| 14 to >12.0 Pts Fair | The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, including potential referrals and medications. | 14 pts |
| 12 to >0 Pts Poor | The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, including potential referrals and medications, or is missing. | 12 pts |
Total points: 100
References For NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment
Barone Gibbs, B., Hivert, M.-F., Jerome, G. J., Kraus, W. E., Rosenkranz, S. K., Schorr, E. N., Spartano, N. L., & Lobelo, F. (2021). Physical activity as a critical component of first-line treatment for elevated blood pressure or cholesterol: Who, what, and how?: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension, 78(2). https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.0000000000000196
Boeddinghaus, J., Nestelberger, T., Koechlin, L., Wussler, D., Lopez-Ayala, P., Walter, J. E., Troester, V., Ratmann, P. D., Seidel, F., Zimmermann, T., Badertscher, P., Wildi, K., Rubini Giménez, M., Potlukova, E., Strebel, I., Freese, M., Miró, Ò., Martin-Sanchez, F. J., Kawecki, D., & Keller, D. I. (2020). Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin i. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 75(10), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.065
Ewelina Młynarska, Czarnik, W., Piotr Fularski, Hajdys, J., Majchrowicz, G., Stabrawa, M., Rysz, J., & Franczyk, B. (2024). From atherosclerotic plaque to myocardial infarction—the leading cause of coronary artery occlusion. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 7295–7295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137295
Takahashi, J., Onuma, S., Hao, K., Godo, S., Shiroto, T., & Yasuda, S. (2023). Pathophysiology and diagnostic pathway of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Journal of Cardiology, 83(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.07.014
Yang, J., Yang, S., Xu, Y., Lu, F., You, L., He, Z., Zhan, S., Ye, C., Liu, M., Fu, C., & Wang, C. (2021). Evaluation of renal oxygenation and hemodynamics in patients with chronic kidney disease by blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging and intrarenal doppler ultrasonography. The Nephron Journals/Nephron Journals, 145(6), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516637
Best Professors To Choose From For 6501 Class
- Dr. Angela Stanley
- Dr. Stephen R. Crumb
- Dr. Stephen R. Crumb
- Dr. Deanna Johnson
- Dr. Judi Kuric
- Dr. Samantha Mielke
(FAQs) related to NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment
Question 1: From where to download a free sample for NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment?
Answer 1: You can download a free sample for NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment from Tutors Academy.
Question 2: Where can I find the rubrics for NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment?
Answer 2: You can find the complete rubrics file for NURS 6501 Week 3 Assignment at Tutors Academy.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery