NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing
a Research Paper
Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX4025
Professor’s Name
Submission Date
Abstract
Figure 01
Abstract of Article

Keywords
Evidence Credibility Evaluation, Pyramid of Evidence Hierarchy, Nursing Diagnosis Research, Evidence-Based Decision Framework.
References
Huang, S.-H., Hsu, H.-C., Lee, T.-F., Fan, H.-M., Tseng, C.-W., Chen, I-Hui., Shen, H., Lee, C.-Y., Tai, H.-T., Hsu, H.-M., & Hung, C.-C. (2023). Prevalence, Associated factors, and appropriateness of empirical treatment of Trichomoniasis, Bacterial Vaginosis, and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among women with Vaginitis. Microbiology Spectrum, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00161-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00161-23
Published Date
April 13, 2023
Figure 02
Sentinel U Patient Screenshot

Table 01
Article Description
Criterion | Question |
1 | Summary of the Type of Study: Huang et al. (2023) carried out a cross-sectional observational study of 429 symptomatic women. The objective of the study was to examine the prevalence and empirical treatment of vaginal infections. Based on the pyramid of evidence hierarchy, the study is of Level III evidence, since it is a well-designed non-experimental study with data correlation rather than randomized intervention trials as the primary research question. The scholarly article anatomy of the methodology, such as the employment of PCR and culture-based diagnostics, gives credibility to the findings and reinforces nursing evidence-based decision models. |
2 | Credibility of Article: The article has high evidence credibility as it is published by a peer-reviewed journal, namely Microbiology Spectrum, which is published by the American Society of Microbiology. The credibility factors checklist is fulfilled with the help of: · A big sample size (n=429) that was statistically significant. · Use approved diagnostic methods (multiplex PCR, vaginal cultures). · Open authoring and ORCID, which makes scholarship responsible. · The application of logistic regression analysis makes it reliable as confounding variables are minimized. · These factors render the article a reliable source of nursing research, diagnosis, and clinical decision-making evidence. |
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
3 | Importance of Content: The research article notes that 55.2 percent of empiric management of vaginitis was unsuitable, and the protocols of medication prescription should be evidence-based. It also determines the risk factors such as multiple sexual partners and unprotected intercourse, which are directly linked to the cases of Sentinel U diagnosis application, such as a patient, Jordan Whitman. The results support the significance of proper research on nursing diagnosis, education of patients on safe sexual behavior, and advanced laboratory-based decision-making in clinical practice. |
4 | Ability to Apply Content to the Workplace: The results can be applied to populations of adolescents and young adults worldwide, not in Taiwan so that they can be used in primary care and school-based clinics. Nurses will be able to use the results in: · Promote pre-treatment laboratory-verified testing. · Enhance evidence-based clinical decision-making models. · Decrease the abuse of antibiotics in sexual health issues. · Enhance patient outcomes using systematic nursing assessment and individualized teaching. · The study provides evidence-based practical knowledge that is compliant with nursing best practices, which supports the EBP article selection guide to be used by professionals in clinical practices. |
Analyzing a Research Paper
The clinical significance of the research article by Huang et al. (2023) is that it is an evidence-based nursing research that focuses on the prevalence, diagnostic difficulties, and treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis in symptomatic women. Through a quantitative and cross-sectional research design, the study reveals the complexity of vaginitis diagnosis because of the overlapping symptoms, which most of the time lead to ineffective empiric treatment. This article is directly applicable in the Sentinel U diagnosis application by offering clinically relevant information that may be used in researching nursing diagnosis accurately and making informed decisions, especially in the scenario of the patient Jordan Whitman.
NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
The application of PCR testing and culture-based diagnostics illustrates the compliance with the high pyramid of evidence hierarchy standards, which enhances the STI control strategies and the achievement of evidence credibility assessment in clinical practice. This strengthens a nursing evidence-based decision model, which assists nurses in preventing diagnostic errors and improving patient outcomes.
This article is of great value to nursing practice because it gives practical information on nursing assessment, patient counseling, and responsible prescribing. The study findings in adolescent health clinics, where the history of patients is usually incomplete, emphasize the importance of laboratory confirmation in line with clinical decision-making evidence and practice of research generalization. Altogether, the article is up to date, peer-reviewed, and leads to evidence-based nursing practice, which meets the criteria of professional scholarship in healthcare research.
Ready to master PICO(T) formulation? Check out our guide to NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 3 Developing a PICO(T) for practical tips and structured strategies.
Instructions To Write NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1
If you need guidance to write NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper, contact Tutors Academy. Our expert tutors are ready to help you succeed.
Instruction file for 4025 Assessment 1
Assessment 1
Analyzing a Research Paper
Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.
Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.
Preparation
Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:
What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?
Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.
These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.
Also, look at the “Find EPB Articles” section of the Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found in the guide’s left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.
Instructions
Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.
Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:
Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
Review the article for the following criteria:
Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
Credibility factors.
Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the Example of Screenshot [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.
Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.
Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you’ve found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
Include a link to your article.
Include a reference to your article in APA format.
Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
Identify the credibility factors of an article.
Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
Scoring Guide for 4025 Assessment 1
Scoring guide for this assessment will be added soon.
A List Of Capella Library References
Huang, S.-H., Hsu, H.-C., Lee, T.-F., Fan, H.-M., Tseng, C.-W., Chen, I-Hui., Shen, H., Lee, C.-Y., Tai, H.-T., Hsu, H.-M., & Hung, C.-C. (2023).
Prevalence, Associated factors, and appropriateness of empirical treatment of Trichomoniasis, Bacterial Vaginosis, and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among women with Vaginitis. Microbiology Spectrum, 11(3).
Best Professors To Choose From For 4025 Class
- Dr. Samantha Reynolds, PhD, RN
Professor Michael J. Carter, DNP, APRN
Dr. Aisha Patel, PhD, CNL
Professor Marcus V. Delgado, DNP, RN
Dr. Elena M. Brooks, PhD, FNP-BC
(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1
Question 1: From where can I download a free sample for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 1?
Answer 1: You can download a free sample for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 1 from the Tutors Academy website.
Question 2: Where can I find the instructions and rubric file for NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 1?
Answer 2: You can find the rubric and instruction files for this assessment on the Tutors Academy sample page for NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 1.
Question 3: What is NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 1?
Answer 3: NURS-FPX 4025 Assessment 1 is a research paper analysis evaluating a study’s design, credibility, and relevance to nursing practice.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery

