- NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 4 Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice.
Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice
Criterion One: How Patient Care Technology Affects Patient Care and Nursing Practice
As technology is created, healthcare professionals find ways to involve it to help improve patient care, preventative medicine, and compliance with treatment processes. One technology that can be used for this purpose is wearable health education, such as smartwatches. Apple Watches, Fitbits, and the many other conventional interpretations have made it feasible for individuals to monitor their step count, heart rate, rest patterns, and significantly more by remembering to keep the gadget charged and wear it on their wrist at each available second.
Many smartphone applications organize this data into charts and graphs and even allow sharing of the data with others. An outline done by Michigan Wise Activity and Clinical Trajectories in Health even saw that individuals would actually increase their activity because they are wearing these watches (Golbus and So Forward 2021, p. 20).
While this accompanies many advantages, there are also several disadvantages to the wearable gadgets. Apple Watches and Fitbits are accurate and reliable gadgets; however, they are expensive, and patients may be unable to afford them. Therefore, they may go for an off-brand interpretation which may not be scientifically approved.
These gadgets also require the wearer to situate them appropriately and, if not positioned impeccably, can give inaccurate data. Indeed, even the Apple Watch was found in a validation concentrate by David Hernando and associates to “contain gaps” and even miss several heartbeats themselves (Hernando and so on, 2018, p. 8). This shows that even the most reliable of these wearable watches is flawed, and there is as yet an entryway to get better with this technology. Explore our assessment NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 2 Quantitative for more information.
Criterion Two: Analyze How Data Generated by Technology is Communicated
Data generated with medical technology is a helpful way for health professionals to collaborate and monitor a patient’s health status. Electronic frameworks within facilities have allowed doctors to search through records and see patient patterns with a button snap. Data can be transferred via fax, email, and even new HIIPAA-compliant text messaging frameworks. Many hospitals and medical clinics run all alone, all-alone tell, giving p, patients at home an immediate link to their providers.
NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 4 Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice
This is how patients could utilize communication with the readings performed on their wearable gadgets. These gadgets accompany their apps that organize all the information into charts and graphs. It helps detail the times when heart rate may have gone up or may have been undetectable and gives it durably so the health professionals can analyze the data and make inferences on treatment. Having the immediate link to the provider in another app makes it easy and safe to download the data and send it to your doctor without keeping a worked-out detailed log.
Criterion Three: Analyze the Controls and Safeguards to Maintain Patient Safety and Confidentiality
Protecting patients’ chances and health information has transformed much of healthcare. With improved portable healthcare technology, the FDA has had to change regulations to keep this security. Healthcare informatics have allowed patients to regain their independence through the ethical principle of autonomy while respecting privacy and information property (Aluas, 2016, p. 2). Unequivocal legal regulations are as yet underway and ought to be reevaluated with each new improvement in technology, “yet there are several other legal regulations related to the security of medical data and professionals who Deal with the personal information,” which can be transferred in these circumstances (Aluas, 2016, p. 3).
FDA Regulation of Medical Innovations
The FDA’s liability to regulate these new medical innovations is complicated as each new application or gadget may not be like the other. There is no particular blanket classification that they can organize these into, so they ought to evaluate each individually and make changes to regulations based on their findings. Kevin Khachatryan continued to say that the “amount of regulation depends on the potential risk of harm from the gadget” (2015, p. 3). This cycle can cause complications while regulating and approving gadgets and applications. The FDA would have to regulate communication, storage, monitoring, and significantly more to guarantee that the gadget safeguards a patient’s rights before being utilized within the local medical area.
Criterion Four: Explain How Evidence-Based Strategies Could Help Improve Application of a Piece of Patient Care Technology
Similar to other aspects of health care, technology should also follow an evidence-based approach while making changes to usage. Evidence-based practice means that one would carry out “a fundamental search and evaluation of research, clinical expertise, and consideration of the patient’s inclinations and values” (Inger, 2016, p. 1). This includes the area of medical technology, as everything changes with each discovery. Medical professionals should stay aware of the new advances that can be carried out and be encouraged to involve EBP in their care, which can help improve patient outcomes and compliance.
NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 4 Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice
Data created with medical technology could also help formulate new EBP, which professionals evaluate and analyze. Validated work is vital while considering any research practices; however, it is significantly more important when looking at data from medical advancements. A healthcare Professionals would want to be sure that the research they are reviewing is from tenable and reliable sources rather than relying on an independent journal article that has not been peer-investigated or holds any scholarship.
Challenges in Implementing Evidence-Based Practices
Implementing these practices into everyday healthcare can be a challenge for many. Inger further outlines in his research that “the most broadly seen barriers were lack of time and lack of autonomy and authority to change practices” (2016, p. 2). Many companies and facilities will, as often as conceivable, abruptly spike in demand for the “in case it isn’t bankrupt, don’t fix it” mentality and are not willing to attempt new practices, assuming it means giving up ones that they already know serious areas of solidarity for are their own clinical experience. Each healthcare professional is available to change, and businesses guarantee they remain educated and exceptional on changes as the standards of care may also change for a long stretch.
Conclusion
Healthcare agencies are liable for keeping up with the changing times to help furnish the population with the best care. Technology has transformed into a significant part of healthcare practice, including wearable gadgets, versatile applications, and communication gadgets, as explored in NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 4 Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice.
Evidence-based practices, including technology use, should be carried out in each healthcare category. Businesses and professionals should strive to stay up-to-date while protecting patients’ chances and following ethical implications. As the FDA regulates the usage of this technology, everyone should remain liberal and attempt to stay up to date with any new validated research, particularly in the context of NURS FPX 5005 Assessment 4 Analysis of Technology in Nursing Practice.
References
Golbus, M., & So Forward, L. (2021). Michigan Wise Activity and Clinical Trajectories in Health. https://www.michiganwiseactivity.com
Hernando, D., et al. (2018). Validation of Apple Watch for Heart Rate Monitoring. https://www.journalofvalidation.com
Aluas, I. (2016). Ethical Considerations in Mobile Health Technology. https://www.healthtechethics.com
Khachatryan, K. (2015). Regulatory Challenges in Mobile Health Technology. https://www.mhealthregulation.com
Inger, M. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Technology. https://www.evidencebasedpracticehealthcare.com