NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 2 Professional Practice Plan

NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 2 Sample FREE DOWNLOAD

NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2

Professional Practice Plan

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX8004

Professor Name

Submission Date

Introduction

The practice site has a critical issue of delayed diagnosis in the early detection and identification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the pediatric population, which has led to poor outcomes and quality of life. In pediatric patients referred to pulmonary evaluation, more than 40 percent of the patients had moderate to severe PH when they were diagnosed on site (Executive Nurse, personal communication, May 20, 2025). At the national level, delays that exceed one year in the diagnosis are found to be consistent (DuBrock et al., 2023). The slowness is only explained by general initial symptoms and how providers keep varying their diagnostic methods. The absence of quality PH screening protocols on the site results in delayed diagnosis, which causes not only the progression of the disease but also the rise of healthcare expenses.

Sealing the described gap is necessary to enhance clinical efficiencies, quality, and long-term patient outcomes. The practice gap concerning the ineffective PH screening practices on the pediatric patients shows that a quality improvement initiative is necessary with the goal of achieving better diagnosis by 25 percent or more in six months. The goal of the quality improvement project is to improve the rate of diagnosis of pediatric PH at the practice site, which will be measurable using standardized screening procedures as outlined in the project question.

Population

The practice site includes pediatric patients of 0-10 years referred to a pulmonary specialty clinic to determine the etiology of unexplained respiratory symptoms. Patients are usually subjected to diagnostic tests, which will include chest radiography and pulmonary function tests. The pediatric patients are first suspected to have asthma, viral illness, or congenital heart disease, and this may contribute to the delay in proper referral to get PH assessment (Wacker & Beghetti, 2025).

The population impact of the practice problem, e.g., slow diagnosis and identification of PH, is that it enables the disease to reach moderate or severe stages before diagnosis, reduces the efficiency of treatment, and deteriorates long-term outcomes (Executive Nurse, personal communication, May 20, 2025). The inclusion criteria are all pediatric patients referred to PH evaluation who are not known to have PH established. The exclusion criteria are patients who are diagnosed with PH or patients referred due to an unrelated condition (neurological or dermatologic). Therefore, the requirements reveal that the project includes only the main population.

Stakeholder

The stakeholders of the practice site are the pediatric pulmonologists, nurse practitioners, the referring primary care providers, care coordinators, and executive leadership of the clinic. Pediatric pulmonologists and cardiologists are those who diagnose and treat PH in children and are essential in the interpretation of diagnostic data and formulation of effective treatment strategies (Varghese et al., 2024). Nurse practitioners are the first point of contact in assessments and follow-ups, and clinical judgment determines how the referral and investigation proceed. Care coordinators help with patient navigation and liaise with providers to ensure the best, timely access to diagnostic tests. Another stakeholder involved in the implementation of quality improvement initiatives is the executive leadership, including the clinical director.

By helping to engage the stakeholders and enhancing the likelihood of the project’s success, the message about the improvement practices will be positioned in each stakeholder group based on the specific set of roles, responsibilities, and priorities. Clinical providers will be informed about the most crucial information about how the project enhances the accuracy of the diagnosis and helps patients. The meetings of teams will be organized to address the necessity of change in the practices of early PH recognition and the advantages of uniform screening procedures (Gillmeyer et al., 2022). Communications among nurse providers aim at promoting patient compliance with the follow-up appointment to facilitate timely referral. The physical team meetings with the nurses help convey the importance of the patient attending the follow-up session. The care coordinators will participate in discussions aimed at streamlining patient diagnostic processes (Giri et al., 2021). The use of two-way communication will illustrate how the processes will be simplified and enhance the early diagnosis by increasing patient adherence to the tests.

The messages to the executive leadership are aimed at discussing the organizational-level performance indicators and ways to enhance the quality standards of care. The messages will be communicated to the executives using the presentations to facilitate the implementation of the plan (Brewer et al., 2021). To achieve cooperation and collaboration in the proposed site, the approach will be to engage the stakeholders early by holding organized meetings, clearly explaining the purpose and the benefits of the project, and integrating the feedback to build shared ownership (Varghese et al., 2024). Consequently, the team meetings, presentations, two-way communication, and the Q&A session will help prioritize the interests and views of every stakeholder group to enhance the diagnosis of the PH in the pediatric patients at the project site.

Project Question

The project clinical problem can be constructed in the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time (PICOT) format that can inform the formulation of a quality improvement initiative. The labels and the PICOT question are as follows; In pediatric patients aged 0 to 10 years at risk of PH (P), how does the introduction of a standardized screening protocol of PH (I) compared to the existing practices of non-use of the standardized tool (C) improve the diagnosis of PH by 25 percent (O) within a six-month (T)? The question addressed the necessity to apply the evidence-based screening method to enhance the early diagnosis of the PH in children. In this way, the results would be evaluated by a quantifiable enhancement in the PH diagnostic rate among pediatric patients. Thus, the PICOT question is devoted to improving clinical outcomes and compliance with best practices.

Conclusion

In the professional practice plan, the information on the practice site, practice problem, population, stakeholder, and PICOT question is presented. The plan aims to bridge the practice gap in delayed pediatric PH diagnosis by introducing a quality improvement initiative. The main population includes pediatric patients, aged 0-10 years. In addition, the details of the communication strategy to reach the stakeholders to implement the plan are given. It also emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure effective implementation and sustainability of the initiative. The plan also highlights the role of evidence-based strategies in guiding decision-making and ensuring improved patient outcomes. Moreover, the project question contains the information on the proposed intervention that results in measurable outcomes.

Step-By-Step Instructions To Write NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 2

Follow the instructions given below to write your NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2

Objective: Create a 3-5 page plan with a summary of your practical report. Focus on the introduction, audience, stakeholders, a PICO question, and the conclusion.

Required Headings (APA Level 1)

  • Introduction

  • Target Audience

  • Stakeholders

  • Problem Question

  • Conclusion

Step-by-Step Instructions

1. Review and prepare.

  • Submit your graded Assessment 1 (Practical Report).

  • Include instructor feedback.

  • Submit at least four recent (less than five years old) scholarly sources on your topic.

2. Title Page (APA Format)

  • Use Times New Roman (12 pt), 1-inch margins, and double-spaced.

  • Include: Title, Name, Capella University, Course, Instructor, Date.

  • No abstract or header is required.

3. Introduction

  • Summarize the context from Section II of your previous report.

Specify:

  • Problem statement (1-2 sentences: problem statement + measurable objective).

  • A thesis statement describing the purpose of the project.

4. Population

Describe the affected group in detail:

  • Role, age, diagnosis/procedure.

  • How the problem affects them.

  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria.

5. Stakeholders (2-3 paragraphs)

  • Paragraph 1: Identify the stakeholders and their roles related to the problem.

  • Paragraph 2: Explain how you will develop communications for each group.

  • Paragraph 3: Describe your outreach strategy (e.g., committee, pilot project, updates).

6. Problem question

  • PICO question: “Does [competition] in [population] lead to [outcome] compared to [competition]?”

  • Describe each component (P, I, C, O) in complete sentences.

7. Conclusion

  • Summarize the main points without introducing any new information.

  • Repeat the thesis and emphasize its importance.

8. References

  • Start on a new page.

  • Center references at the top.

  • List all cited sources in proper APA 7th format with hanging indentations.

9. Final Check

  • Length: 3–5 pages (excluding titles and references).

  • APA formatting: References, headings, font, margins.

  • File name: Last Name, First Name · Grade 2 Attempt No.

Resources

Capella Resources: Writing Center (review/templates), Library (research guide), Academic Writer (APA guide).

Tools: Zotero (reference list), Grammarly (proofreading).

Writing Tips:

  • Use a MEAL plan (main idea, evidence, analysis, links) for paragraphs.

  • First, outline each section.

  • Read your work aloud to find errors.

References For NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 2

You can use these References for your assessment:

Brewer, J., Bartlett, M., Harris, D., & Hui, C. (2021). Improving communication between healthcare providers and pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: A survey of patient preferences. Pulmonary Circulation11(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20458940211015813

DuBrock, H. M., Germack, H. D., Loiselle, M. G., Linder, J., Satija, A., Manceur, A. M., Cloutier, M., Lefebvre, P., Panjabi, S., & Frantz, R. P. (2023). Economic burden of delayed diagnosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). PharmacoEconomics – Open8(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-023-00453-8 

Gillmeyer, K. R., Johnson, S. W., Bolton, R. E., McCullough, M. B., & Wiener. R. S. (2022). Organization of pulmonary hypertension care in non‐expert care settings: Lessons learned from a multi‐site study. Health Services Research58(3), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14114

Giri, P. C., Stevens, G. J., Merrill‐Henry, J., Oyoyo, U., & Balasubramanian, V. P. (2021). Participation in pulmonary hypertension support group improves patient‐reported health quality outcomes: A patient and caregiver survey. Pulmonary Circulation11(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20458940211013258

Varghese, N. P., Austin, E. D., Galambos, C., Mullen, M. P., Yung, D., R. Guillerman, P., Vargas, S. O., Avitabile, C. M., Chartan, C. A., Santiago, N. C., Ibach, M., Jackson, E. O., Jarrell, J. A., Keller, R. L., Krishnan, U. S., Patel, K. R., Pogoriler, J., Whalen, E. C., Brokamp, K., & Villafranco, N. M. (2024). An interdisciplinary consensus approach to pulmonary hypertension in developmental lung disorders. European Respiratory Journal64(3), e2400639. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00639-2024

Wacker, J., & Beghetti, M. (2025). Pulmonary hypertension in pediatrics: From clinical suspicion to management. European Journal of Pediatrics184(5), 288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06099-4

Master your coursework with our expert guide — check out NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 3 and boost your grades today!

Best Professors To Choose From For 8004 Class

  • Lisa Kreeger, PhD, RN
  • Linda Matheson, PhD
  • Donna Hill, DNP, MSN
  • Audra Somes
  • Helena M. H. Nadder, PhD

(FAQs) related to NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2

Question 1: How do I write the NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2 step by step?
Answer 1: The Tutors Academy provides clear, step-by-step guidance with support for research, outlining, APA writing, and proofreading.

Question 2: Where can I find examples or templates for the NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2?
Answer 2: You can access structured samples and templates for the NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2 directly from the Tutors Academy.

Question 3: What are the guidelines for the NURS-FPX 8004 Assessment 2?
Answer 3: The Tutors Academy explains the official guidelines, focusing on the practice site, the problem, the population, the stakeholders, and the PICOT framework.

Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.

    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

    Fill the form to instantly 
    download your free sample!

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

      Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
      Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

        Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

        Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
        Fill the form to instantly view instructions.

          Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

          Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

          Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
          Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

            Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

            Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

            Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
            Submit the form to get
            Capella references now.

              Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

              Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

              Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
              Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

                Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

                Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                Complete the form to find top professors.

                  Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                  Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

                  Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                  Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

                    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                    Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

                    Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                    Fill the form to unlock FAQs instantly.

                      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                      Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

                      Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                      Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

                        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                        Privacy Policy & SMS Terms of Service

                        Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                        Scroll to Top