- NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 2 Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment.
Assessment 01: Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment
Capella University
NURS-FPX6224
Instructor Name
Due Date
Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment
Technology evaluation and era evaluation are crucial for healthcare, enabling thorough analysis, identifying opportunities, and determining the beneficial and practical resource requirements. Era reviews confirm that the chosen generation is beneficial in meeting organizational needs, enhances affected character outcomes, and optimizes working efficiency (Markaki et al., 2021). Constructing installation systems enables healthcare organizations to make informed decisions, thereby enhancing departmental efficiency and patient care. Explore NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 1 for more information.
Relevance and Importance of a Needs Assessment
Dreams evaluation is a necessary detail for fitness centers, such as encompassing fitness and Rehabilitation clinics. Bhawra et al. (2022) describe goal assessment as one of the assessment and research tools that can be used to determine where there may be a coverage, application, or offering that is hollow or in which reinforcement is needed. It identifies gaps, ranks, and facilitates knowledge-based decision-making. Through the integration of attempts to address reasons for higher care needs, strategy development, and staff guidance, the company achieves an excellent level of resource utilization. Goal assessment identifies priority areas, including care provision gaps, rating beneficial resource utilization, fostering stakeholder collaboration, and, most significantly, improving individual outcomes (Bhawra et al., 2022). The method encompasses technology, sources, and strategies tailored to meet the organizational motives and care requirements.
Technological Assessment in Nursing
Encompass fitness nursing managers assess the goals to gather feedback regarding possibilities and areas of technological gaps. They report the capacity utilization of cutting-edge devices, as well as rehabilitation devices and electronic health records (EHRs), in assembly operations and medical settings. Markaki et al. (2021) outline a similar assessment to analyze the possibility of how automation technology may also be applied to sports activities, improve patient outcomes, and enhance employee satisfaction. Second, in recruiting multidisciplinary employees, they often recruit in a way that leaves ample records of the troubles and issues. Most significantly, that data offer the nurse leaders the mandate to area themselves to the vicinity in which they are capable of recommending technological advancements that may be required, educating their employees on the way to function with much more current generation, and maintaining refining infrastructure surrounding it so that organizational purpose-orientated and evidence-driven choice-making is decided out. Nurse leaders anticipate needs assessment, machine implementation, and evaluation.
These are abilities that enable leaders to guide investments or modifications primarily based on suitable data. Nair et al. (2024) reaffirm that through proper evaluation, which allows the identification of challenging situations, the adoption of new generations, and the pursuit of dreams for beneficial and valuable aid, successful implementation is promoted. Besides this, proper appreciation ensures that proposed answers do not conflict with organizational strategic goals, individual desires for remedy, and property, ultimately guaranteeing a top-notch and accurate decision-making method. Assumptions: There are assumptions commonly made at the back of the selection to position and influence the evaluation of the goals in embodying fitness.
Underlying Assumptions
The era, which includes EHRs or rehabilitation tools, has been deemed no longer suitable for clinical or business organization functions. Personnel, in all likelihood, need to have been presumed to require greater education to make effective use of gift structures or adopt new ones (Markaki et al., 2021). Secondly, the infrastructural functionality within the structure of program applications and hardware has been presumed to be a key impediment to adopting complex solutions. Thirdly, present-day generations have been raised, barring any interest, not to have been well-designed to address the specialized rehabilitation needs of the intended population. Such assumptions need to be subjected to proper scrutiny to identify the loopholes and develop actionable solutions to address them.
Evaluate Technology Infrastructure in Healthcare
Embody Fitness and Rehabilitation Clinic utilizes a range of technological devices across its departments to offer valuable resources for personalized care. The rehabilitation branch utilizes electronic health record (EHR) systems, rehabilitative devices, and specialized treatment and stroke rehabilitation equipment. They are suitable for robust documentation of affected person development, treatment planning, and manipulation of theclinical workflow (Globus et al., 2023). For instance, IT assistance is provided to these systems within the hospital, including a community of computer systems, data storage devices, and telemedicine systems. The synergy and productivity of such technology range from branch to department, affected by individual desires and professional employees.
Such technology enables affected character care but is not price-powerful, excellent, and honest care for numerous patients. In particular, the winning EHR device can capture the entirety of patient data but lacks thematurity to support rehabilitation-specific functionalities and the entire EHR system, which introduces inefficiencies in patient data (Tsai et al., 2020). Specifically, few generations nowadays can handle the real-time rehabilitation of patients with stroke, such as tracking posture, gait, and levels of bodily activity required in the rehabilitation process and for planning interventions. Its maximum persuasive need is in the rehabilitation department, wherein non-invasive monitoring-based total interest should be supplied for optimum use.
NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 2 Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment
The second is a health facility-era device. Although tips are prevalent in the modern era, proof and low-level monitoring and observation of bodily restoration are of greater significance, especially for stroke patients. Due to the reality that affected individual rehabilitation is that affected man or woman-tailor-made and data-heavy in nature, everyday technology use falls quickly, real-time, and rapidly, gathering the person’s data to reply in real-time and on a personal basis, and deregulating reliance upon non-modern, non-virtual era for a few physical therapy consequences functionality inflexibility in adhering to and enhancing treatment plans based entirely upon contemporary, actual-time information (Owens et al., 2020). These motives lag among patient states and administrative time.
There was a list of upgrades or new generations required in the technology infrastructure of the medical institution. Wearable hobby, posture, and gait monitoring integration into stroke rehabilitation is probably the most significant real-trealtimeyment, as it should enable non-stop, real-time feedback, which could allow clinicians to orient with new evidence, anticipate functional challenges, and facilitate data-driven interventions in the rehabilitation process (Peters et al., 2021). Apart from this, it may create room for early and custom-designed interventions that could lead to superior patient outcomes, similar to care effectiveness. One of the most pressing areas where era infrastructure must fill the gap is the absence of state-of-the-art tracking devices.
Conflicting Data
Whereas the generation of encompass health is presently able to address the goals of the patients, its lure 22 scenario, particularly in stroke rehabilitation, calls for a shift. Indeed, some of the novel eras that encompass wearables are likely to be high-priced or may necessitate significant personnel training. Furthermore, embedding the devices into current-day EHR structures will become technically challenging, compromising typical workflow performance.
Improving Technology to Enhance Patient Outcomes
The implementation of wearable technology in monitoring gait, posture, and bodily function simultaneously with rehabilitation after a stroke is critical in enhancing affected character outcomes compared to improving the effectiveness of nursing interventions at comprehensive fitness and Rehabilitation hospitals. Through the of this period, wearables such as bright clothes, innovative footwear, or smart bands with smart sensors could be integrated to track real-time wearable posture (Peters et al., 2021). A significant amount of important information, which may be monitored using gadgets, is being collected and interpreted in an attempt to make assertions about the recovery approach and the success of the treatment protocol.
Wearable Integration in EHRs
This deployment must be thoroughly managed during its implementation. The records need to be transferred from real-time devices to documents, which is necessary because the wearables are being integrated into the hospital’s current Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Dinh-Le et al. (2019) defined the EHR device as one that is designed to be real-time and utilizes real-time information, which clinicians can use to complete tasks, including those involving patients and individuals who may also benefit from expertise in device use and clinicians’ data interpretation.
Considering that they will be valuable resources for the affected individual’s health reputation, wearable sensors can likely facilitate the simpler monitoring of more common and accurate stroke patients. Pathological gait situations, mobility-impaired (gait, posture, interest degree), can be identified with the valuable aid of clinicians, who can provide real-time data regarding posture and interest stages (Boukhennoufa et al., 2022). With such problems highlighted at an initial level, clinicians are capable of making effective modifications to remedy approaches so that mistakes do not occur unnecessarily before they have an impact on the affected individual’s preferred treatment. This would decrease the risk of complications, such as falls or cuts, in cases of incapacity, resulting in longer recovery times and additional healthcare costs.
NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 2 Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment
Wearables promise to bring greater precision to nursing care practices. Non-foreseeable records enable nurses to document the restoration of the affected person and adjust accordingly as a result of intermittent reassessment or subjective assessment (Ernstmeyer & Christman, 2021). Nurses may not spend time on the bulky hand series in this era and can have more time to attend to patients. It would promote greater and more powerful coordination among several interdisciplinary organizations, considering that each clinician concerned with real-time access to the same data, as well as preference-making and care coordination, would be facilitated.
It would, moreover, have a primary effect on organizational outcomes. The sanatorium can reap reduced readmission rates and increased patient satisfaction by leveraging real-time data from wearable devices. With the implementation of real-time in stroke rehabilitation, encompassing fitness and Rehabilitation medical institutions, its use may become vital due to the enhancement of patient outcomes. This would appeal to a greater number of patients seeking outstanding modern rehabilitation, and this might be a reason for greater recognition of the installed order and affected character census for the sanatorium.
Improving Cooperation, Safety, and Work Efficiency
Facilitating hobby stroking, posture, and gait testing in Embody Health and Rehabilitation Sanatorium will greatly improve cooperation between departments, improve patient safety, and guarantee maximum work efficiency.
Improved Cooperation
The wearable age will facilitate greater interdisciplinary coordination with empowering clinicians by having correct data, in real-time. Stroke rehabilitation is supported by a team of multidisciplinary professionals—doctors, nurses, physical therapists, nutritionists, pharmacists, and case managers—who are often dependent on current information (Encompass Health and Rehabilitation Health Center, n.d.). Wearables will monitor ambulation, posture, and gait of patients in real time so that treatment can be tailored to individual need based on aggregate information. Wearables plug department-to-department gaps in information so everyone interested in care sees the same pool of records.
It is worth it because patient care is customized to their particular need. Body therapists, for instance, can emphasize rehabilitation exercise at the expense of actual gait data, and nurses can track posture to prevent falls. This double shift in facts will create communication, aid in collaborative preference-making, and finally have a positive effect on personal outcomes versus the existing workout that is all about solo dimensions and documentation hours.
Improving Patient Safety
Wearable technology significantly improves individual protection. Real-time wearable movement sensors have the potential to provide instant feedback regarding transmission of potentially unstable impairment of posture or gait, i.e., risk of falling. Pre-notification of signal of instability prior to its development enables the clinician to take action early and adjust treatment interventions to remove risk factors. For instance, adaptive care management or spontaneous treatment in a stroke or gait instability patient avoids harm (Stock et al., 2024). Enhancing conventional shielding with decreased dependence on monitoring accuracy, wearables provide actual situational awareness, real-time streams of information, and response to threats to shielding with less accident and decreased overall individual safety risk.
Efficiency Increase
This next generation of wearables will all do this for themselves with so much less kit in the office and on-site testing needed. Stroke rehabilitation these days is full of ad hoc screening at irregular intervals and is subject to human error. Wearables are not subject to human error because statistics are automatically generated, aside from equally manual inputs that can never be removed. Health professionals are devoted to cure and, in the moment, modify procedures (Krothapalli, 2024).
NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 2 Technology Evaluation and Needs Assessment
Apart from that, victim data, as well as the valuable wearable tech merchandise, can be exported with ease without having to navigate the complexities of manual paperwork and the resulting time expense. Inegration facilitates simple real-time tracking of affected character popularity and better department coordination. In contrast to delivering machines after conducting daily tests, wearable machines provide continuous, real-time figures that allow instant decision-making and the best possible care.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps in the long-term utility of wearable technology for stroke rehabilitation and long-term effect on patient outcomes have been created. Opportunities for failure of devices, e.g., technology or patient distress, are unknown at this time (Ferguson et al., 2021). It is unclear if data derived from wearable technology can be translated to current health systems and the extent of training healthcare providers will need.
Equitable Healthcare and Access to Resources
Wearable technology is fair care in the form of better results of care and communication with different patient groups.
Facilitating Equitable Care
Wearables facilitate fair care since they facilitate equal observation for every patient, not the patient. The technology provides a universal method of observation rehabilitation parameters, i.e., posture and gait, such that all patients are evaluated based on the same criteria. This strategy fills gaps in treatment in a way that clinicians are facilitated to treat patients equally regardless of rehabilitation requirement or socio-economic status of a patient. Anawade et al. (2024) demonstrate how wearable technology minimizes the requirement for multiple face-to-face consultations and consolidates care for mobility or transport-constrained patients. Physically or geographically remote patients may also be remotely monitored so that they get equal care even if they are physically or geographically remote.
Equal Care Outcomes
Equal care outcomes are also achieved through wearable technology through the provision of customized care. Wearable devices offer clinicians objective and real-time data for resolving interventions on a patient’s unique progress. For instance, a patient who recovers quickly will need a different type of intervention than a slow-recovery patient. Real-time monitoring enables the rehabilitation treatment plans to be customized with precision so that every patient is given proper care based on his/her needs (Lu et al., 2020). In contrast to other devices that are whimsy-based or subjective, wearable sensors provide fact-based and objective monitoring. It is also prejudice-free in assessment and enables all patients, regardless of the condition or origin, to be treated on the basis of measurable information.
Enhancing Health Care Resource Availability
Wearable technology provides real-time availability of health care resources as per patient condition data made available to departments. This renders care coordination an on-time possibility and real-time availability of needed resources as and when needed. For instance, upon notification of gait deterioration by a wearable device, clinicians may re-admit the patient for further therapy or modify their care plan in real time without losing time (Peters et al., 2021). Second, it allows for remote monitoring, with the patient not as often coming to the hospital for consultation. It is particularly handy with rural areas, increasing access to health care for them and giving them equal priority to other patients irrespective of class or place. This increases the scope of health equity and overall quality.
Assumptions
This assumption assumes that wear technology captures actual and up-to-the-minute information and frequent checking will enhance the accuracy of care plans for every patient based on history. It also assumes remote checking will eliminate transport constraints and clinicians can effectively adjust care plans with wear information (Anawade et al., 2024). It also assumes there is shared access to health centers among farmers through shared technology.
Conclusion
A needs assessment for an Encompass Health and Rehabilitation Hospital identifies areas of uncovered care, determines the high-priority use of resources, and ensures collaboration to produce the greatest patient outcomes. Nurse leaders utilize assessments to inform evidence-based decision-making, bridge technology divides, and maximize workflow. Wearables that enable stroke rehabilitation optimize collaboration, safety, and efficiency and provide greater access to resources and care by diverse patient populations.