NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3 FREE DOWNLOAD
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3
Communication Handout and Narrative
Student name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6020: Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice 1
Professor Name
Submission Date
Communication Handout and Narrative
Communication is essential in disaster management, especially when there is a need to protect communities that have been hit by a disastrous event like the flood of the Vila Society. The evaluation focuses on effective communication strategies that are meant to promote collaboration among emergency response organizations to organize and streamline flood preparedness and response to make it more efficient and effective. Clear roles and duties of each team member are the most important factors in ensuring that action is taken quickly and in a well-coordinated manner during times of crisis. The plan will minimise the impact of floods on the susceptible populations by encouraging teamwork and reliance on reliable and formal communication channels.
Narrative
Facilitating Communication
Improving information communication of individual data between professionals is critical in the case of disaster relief, especially in cases where resources are limited, as in the case of the Vila Society. One of the helpful techniques is the efficient way of presenting and structuring information exchange through standardized tools such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) among members without any redundant details (Etemadifar et al., 2021). An example of a community health worker (CHW) can use SBAR to quickly inform medical personnel about a person with the symptoms of a waterborne disease.
The presence of centralized information-sharing systems, such as mobile applications or collaborative documents, also enhances coordination in teams as it provides real-time information about the patient’s status and resource location. Team huddles and frequent briefings make sure everyone is on track and every team member knows their job, and feedback loops allow CHWs and other team members to be mindful of patient outcomes. To avoid misunderstanding and miscommunication, it is necessary to include language translation support, especially among multilingual groups (Horváth and Molnár, 2021).
Finally, privacy maintenance based on the practice of secure data management and confidentiality guarantees the protection of sensitive health data. The effective implementation of interprofessional communication can be achieved by educating the staff on these strategies, performing regular simulation exercises, and establishing a culture of feedback and accountability.
Team Dynamics
Team dynamics, as well as performance components, will always be vital in the attainment of success in disaster response scenarios, as well as in emergencies in public health. The Vila Society flood proved that the mobile water purification units and hygiene education were successful in the case of high-quality interprofessional team performance.
The effectiveness of team functioning was achieved by effective communication, respect, goals, and roles shared, which facilitated effective coordination and decision-making that led to prompt responses and improved health outcomes. When unfavorable team dynamics cause a lack of effective cooperation or a lack of role definition, the delivery of care will be delayed significantly, duplicated, or have a significant gap in care (Salcinovic et al., 2022).
The failure of the public health officials to coordinate with the emergency responders, whether in logistics or health education operations, results in the delayed delivery of necessary services to the community and misleading information. Once teams build trust-based communication systems, it becomes easier to respond to unpredictable circumstances and offer numerous services to different populations that are affected. Good team dynamics will result in the desired outcomes of disaster management, which safeguard the health and safety of vulnerable groups.
Assumptions
Vila Society’s disaster management plan operates on various critical conditions. The Vila Society disaster management plan relies on three main assumptions regarding the preparedness of its multiple interprofessional members that comprise healthcare workers and the professionals working in the public health, emergency responders, and nongovernmental organizations.
The plan will need adequate infrastructure, material resources and communication equipment to effect quick intervention as well as coordination of services. Some of the interventions required to address the affected community include the acceptance of mobile purification units and hygiene education. Realistic objectives and flexible strategies in changing disaster conditions should remain to be evaluated with the help of these assumptions.
Interprofessional Communication Tools and Techniques
The disaster response plan of Vila Society demonstrates the effective interprofessional communication tools and approaches in its ability to improve coordination and minimize delays, and assurance of the appropriate information exchange in crisis situations. The contemporary disaster response systems include centralized communications services along with scheduled briefings, multilingual message services and backup systems via radio networks and phone arbor structures that enable immediate decision-making among teams (Tavakoli et al., 2023).
The funds assist in ensuring the coordination of healthcare workers alongside the professionals of the public health and the emergency first responders. Technical tools like frequent feedback and follow-ups make teams transparent and accountable. The proper training, along with the adequate implementation of communication measures, creates a significant improvement in the results of team-based cooperation and response during disaster management initiatives.
The tools assist teams in developing trust among themselves and also develop mutual understanding, since the two factors are essential when dealing with high-stress emergencies. The information shared in real-time can be reached by the team members who are accustomed to using common digital platforms as a regular practice, and this reduces the likelihood of miscommunication (Kordova and Hirschprung, 2023). By adopting culturally appropriate communication practices, organizations will result in more inclusion of teams, which will translate to high levels of unity and achievement in outreach to various communities.
Assumptions
The premises made on the utilization of interprofessional communication tools in managing disasters are that every team member has equal access to technology, is digitally literate, and is present to engage in regular communication processes. There is also an assumption that the shared platforms and regular updates will automatically result in improved cooperation and improved outcomes. Besides, it is assumed that all people will adhere to communication principles and equally respect the practice of the team, which may not necessarily be the practice of the individual or organization.
Conclusion
Effective disaster management in Vila Society is conditional upon the application of evidence-based interventions, ethical decision-making, and comprehensive interprofessional communications. The plan will make the response in terms of flood-related health hazards timely and inclusive by reducing the multiplicity of the various needs of the affected people and integrating the process of clear communication. The emphasis on team coordination, cultural sensitivity, and community communication is the means to make sure that all people collaborate in a friendly environment to achieve the same goals, and the final goal is to make the disaster preparedness and response activities more effective and sustainable.
Get expert help with NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2 Disaster Management Plan. Secure higher grades with a professionally crafted presentation. Order now!
Instructions To Write NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3
Instructions to write NURS-FPX 6020 Assessment 3
Task: Produce two distinct documents to enhance communication in the crisis scenario of your choice:
- A one to two-page presentation that is single-spaced (similar to a quick reference guide).
- A three to four-page narrative that is double-spaced and explains your decisions.
Section 1: The Quick-Reference Guideline Handout
Make a concise, useful one to two-page handout that crisis personnel can utilize. Use these sections to organize it:
1. Important Team Dynamics and Possible Disagreements
- List the essential components of teamwork that affect how well disaster response works, such as information silos, ambiguous leadership, and a lack of agency trust.
- Provide specific examples of disputes that might result from these relationships. For instance, “Conflict: Due to privacy concerns, public health officials may withhold data from frontline nurses, delaying essential contact tracing.”
2. Useful Communication Techniques
- Offer feasible solutions to avoid or settle the disputes you found.
- To make reading easier, use checklists, insert tables, or use bullet points.
- Provide presenting points and examples.
- Example Method: “Construct a daily virtual meeting that lasts fifteen minutes by using the SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation) framework. Speaking Point: “We need more personal protective equipment by 1400 hours; this is the situation in Shelter A.”
3. Beneficial Sources
- Provide a list of rapid resources, such as the “CDC Conflict and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Manual,” which is a shared scenario report template.
Section 2: The Facts (Explanation Paper)
Write a three to four-page narrative that explains why the information in your handout is important. This is where you demonstrate your ability to think critically.
1. Explain Why You Should Pay Attention to Certain Team Dynamics
- Describe why you felt that the team dynamics section of your handout was the most important.
- To demonstrate why those processes have the greatest influence on success or failure, provide evidence from your study.
2. Assess Communication Methods and Instruments
- Talk about the several communication strategies you looked into, such as SBAR, standard operating procedures, and liaison officers.
- Justify your choice of the particular tactics in your handout versus alternative approaches. In what ways do they directly complement your Assessment 2 disaster management plan?
3. Make a Connection with the Evidence
- In the story and the handout, cite at least three academic sources to back up your conclusions and decisions.
- Make sure to include a page of references and use correct APA citations throughout the narrative.
Checklist for Formatting
- Handout should be of 1-2 pages, professionally formatted, single-spaced, and easy to scan.
- Narration: three to four pages in conventional scholarly format (Times New Roman, 12 points), double-spaced.
- Citations: The story (and handout, if citations are provided) should have its own APA reference page.
- Both documents should be submitted as a single document.
Instructions File For 6020 Assessment 3
Assessment 3
Communication Handout and Narrative
Instructions
Create a handout to give strategies for effective communication, and a separate narrative to evaluate communication strategies most appropriate for your chosen disaster or catastrophic event.
Introduction
Imagine you’re feeling good about the disaster management plan you formulated, and it was well received in the meeting at which you presented. But you know full well the best-laid plans can come apart in the heat of the moment if community organizations and agencies aren’t communicating effectively with each other. So you decide to offer some suggestions via a handout to increase the chances of success.
Preparation
If you haven’t already, use the Capella library to research team dynamics for disasters and public health emergencies, along with strategies for effective communication. In this assessment, you’ll need to evaluate these so you can recommend the most appropriate strategies, given your disaster management plan.
Instructions
Your assessment consists of two pieces:
Handout
Narrative
In the handout:
Identify the team dynamics that have the greatest impact on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Acknowledge the team dynamics that can have the most significant impact on whether or not your disaster management plan is successfully implemented.
Give examples of potential conflicts.
Facilitate improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Give strategies for effective communication, especially the ones that would address the potential conflicts you’ve highlighted. Support these with examples.
Provide resources and speaking points.
Narrative
Along with your handout, submit a separate narrative of how you arrived at the recommendations you suggested in your handout.
Evaluate the impact of team dynamics and performance on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Why did you prioritize the team dynamics you focused on in your handout? Why were these the most important to focus on as opposed to others?
Evaluate effectiveness of interprofessional communication tools and techniques to support and improve the efficacy of team-based interactions.
What strategies, tools, and techniques did you come across in your research? Why were the ones you included in your handout the most appropriate?
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Is your handout and narrative clear and persuasive for the different people who make up your professional audience, and do they use APA style?
Additional Requirements
To achieve a successful assessment experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements.
Written communication: Make sure your writing is succinct and clear, and is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Resources: Include a minimum of three current scholarly sources (peer-reviewed articles, books, websites, and dissertations) to support your case.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Refer to the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.
Length: 1–2 single-spaced pages for the handout and 3–4 double-spaced pages for the narrative, not including title and reference pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3: Collaborate to protect population health.
Evaluate the impact of team dynamics and performance on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Competency 4: Propose communication tools and techniques that can improve interprofessional team dynamics and strengthen partnerships to achieve effective outcomes.
Facilitate improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, using examples and tips that illustrate the strategies.
Evaluate effectiveness of interprofessional communication tools and techniques to support and improve the efficacy of team-based interactions.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Scoring guide for 6020 Assessment 3
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Criterion 1
Facilitates improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, using examples and tips that illustrate the strategies and offer suggestions that contribute to their successful implementation.
Proficient
Facilitates improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, using examples and tips that illustrate the strategies.
Basic
Facilitates improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, but the suggested strategies may be vague or not fully explained.
Non Performance
Does not facilitate improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Criterion 2
Evaluates the impact of team dynamics and performance on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies, identifying assumptions on which the evaluation was based.
Proficient
Evaluates the impact of team dynamics and performance on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Basic
Describes team dynamics but without evaluating their impact on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate the impact of team dynamics and performance on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Criterion 3
Evaluates effectiveness of interprofessional communication tools and techniques to support and improve the efficacy of team-based interactions, identifying assumptions on which the evaluation was based.
Proficient
Evaluates effectiveness of interprofessional communication tools and techniques to support and improve the efficacy of team-based interactions.
Basic
Describes interprofessional communication tools and techniques, but without evaluating the impact on desired outcomes for disasters and public health emergencies.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate effectiveness of interprofessional communication tools and techniques to support and improve the efficacy of team-based interactions.
Criterion 4
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
Proficient
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Basic
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
Non Performance
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
References For NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3
Etemadifar, S., Sedighi, Z., Sedehi, M., & Masoudi, R. (2021). The effect of situation, background, assessment, recommendation-based safety program on patient safety culture in intensive care unit nurses. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 422. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1273_20
Horváth, Á., & Molnár, P. (2021). A review of patient safety communication in multicultural and multilingual healthcare settings with special attention to the U.S. and Canada. Developments in Health Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1556/2066.2021.00041
Kordova, S., & Hirschprung, R. S. (2023). Effectiveness of the forced usage of alternative digital platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic in project communication management. Heliyon, 9(11), e21812. Sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21812
Salcinovic, B., Drew, M., Dijkstra, P., Waddington, G., & Serpell, B. G. (2022). Factors influencing team performance: What can support teams in high-performance sport learn from other industries? A systematic scoping review. Sports Medicine – Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7
Tavakoli, N., Abdolahzadeh, F., Bagherian, H., Peyravi, M., & Kolivand, P. (2023). A comparative study of interagency communications and information exchange in disaster response among selected countries. PubMed, 12(1), 251–251. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_92_23
Best Professors To Choose From For 6020 Class
- Professor Maja Zelihic, PhD.
- Professor JacQualine Abbe, DNP.
- Professor Melissa Zgola, EdD.
- Professor Dawn Wilson, PhD.
(FAQs) related to NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3
Question 1: From where to download a free sample for NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 3?
Answer 1: You can download the 6020 Assessment 3 free from Tutors Academy.
Question 2: Where can I find the instruction file and scoring guide for the 6020 assessment 3?
Answer 2: Get the instruction file and scoring guide directly from the tutors academy website.
Question 3: What is NURS-FPX 6020 Assessment 3 Communication Handout and Narrative about?
Answer 3: This assessment is about disaster communication strategies and evaluation.
Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you with in 24 hours.
- 0% Plagiarised
- 0% AI
- Distinguish grades guarantee
- 24 hour delivery