HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4 Analyzing the Impact of the External Healthcare Environment on an Organization

HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4 Analyzing the Impact of the External Healthcare Environment on an Organization

Student Name

Capella University

HCM-FPX5312: Analyzing the Health Care Environment

Professor Name

Submission Date

×

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

    Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

    Executive Summary/Abstract

    Organization Overview

    The Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS) is an important healthcare provider to a large, disparate, rural clientele across the Appalachian region. With a focus on enhancing the access and quality of care in areas lacking sufficient medical services, ARHS provides hospitals, clinics, and specialty services to rural community members (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, 2024). A variety of primary and emergency services, chronic illness management, and community health initiatives are offered to target health care-challenged populations, though ARHS faces the same critical issues of many rural health care systems that threaten both its service capacity and long-term viability.

    Isolated and with fewer recruitment incentives, ARHS struggles to staff physicians and nurses. ARHS’s staffing issues place its ED and Surgical Centers at risk (Pourmand et al., 2023). Locum tenens offers ARHS a way to fill staffing gaps while ARHS can develop specialized telemedicine services for rural, isolated locations to offer patients continuous access to care. Regulatory pressure on ARHS to absorb costs associated with new EHR and facility upgrades poses additional operational challenges to ARHS. Being a nonprofit rural hospital only exacerbates these challenges (Aguirre et al., 2020). ARHS can develop telemedicine programs to relieve operational constraints. Compared to traditional service upgrades, telemedicine programs offer low capital investment. Additionally, the federal and state rural healthcare grants may cover the cost of telemedicine to rural, isolated healthcare facilities.

    ARHS also struggles with retention of patients, resulting in loss of revenue due to lack of rural services that leads to out-migration of patients to urban hospitals (Bem et al., 2019). The opened services at ARHS resulting from ARHS’s telemedicine programs will provide services that lead to the retention of revenue and patients. ARHS can supplement revenue with federal rural grants for innovative telemedicine programs.

    The proposed solution is the Comprehensive Telemedicine Program, which will aim to improve the recruitment, retention, and regulatory compliance challenges faced by ARHS. Included in the project is the implementation of tele-ED services, which provide emergency care consultations and allow ARHS to sustain ED operational activities despite a lack of on-call staff (Tresenriter et al., 2021). Furthermore, ARHS would provide virtual appointments for additional specialist services, such as cardiology, neurology, and mental health, to limit the out-migration of patients. The program will offer telehealth services training, enabling ARHS to adjust to the best of its ability with the staffing resources available.

    PESTLE Analysis

    As a nonprofit health provider, the ARH System strategically prioritizes and responds to a wide array of external challenges and influences on its operations. A PESTLE analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental) will help provide some understanding of these challenges. ARH works within the framework of Rural Health Policies and legislation. These policies provide the funding and the ability to implement programs supporting health care in underserved health areas, as well as access to telehealth (Gizaw et al., 2022). The sustainability of ARH is impacted by rural health care support from the Administration and Congress, as this either enhances or constrains support for ARH and subsequently determines the focus of ARH in the Appalachian region.

    The declining traditional economic base (especially the coal industry) and the economic distress in the areas ARH strives to serve have created a more difficult working environment for the ARH System. Many of ARH’s patients are insured by government-supported health care, which means lower reimbursement rates and a loss of potential income for ARH. As the largest employer in southeastern Kentucky, ARH’s operation is critical. It sustains the local economy and provides employment in the community (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, 2024). Uncompensated care results in funding gaps and challenges ARH to sustain the balance of adequately serving the community and remaining fiscally responsible.

    Socially, ARH works with existing health challenges of the Appalachian Region, including chronic health conditions and substance use. This advocacy aligns with improving the wellness of the Region. The existing cultural landscape of Appalachia may include stigma, particularly towards mental health (Swan et al., 2020). This is a barrier that ARH is hopeful to overcome, as they use culture to build trust and engage the Region to improve health access. With the aging population of Appalachia, ARH is also working to expand its focus on geriatric care and chronic disease management to fulfill its community health mission.

    From a health technology standpoint, the continued advancement of telehealth may provide an opportunity for Appalachian Regional Healthcare to fill gaps and ease some of the challenges that exist with providing specialty healthcare within rural and isolated communities. Telehealth technology may address specialty care shortages as well. Other technologies, such as ARH’s Electronic Health Record systems, may be cost-prohibitive, but ARH needs to implement these systems to streamline its operations and meet dictated health law standards. Appalachian Regional Healthcare’s Community Health Needs Assessment (2024) provides the best framework for ARH to implement systems and improve community health.

    ARH responds to legal and environmental influences on its healthcare delivery and strategic planning in unique ways. Legally, ARH must operate within the restrictions related to patient privacy, the credentialing of staff, and the standards of the facilities. Compliance consumes a considerable amount of operational resources (Gharra et al., 2022). Being a nonprofit, ARH is able to obtain some legal protections from the balance between community service and the demand for financial sustainability. Recent legislation, such as the expansions to Medicaid and the development of telehealth, outlines the limited flexibility of ARH (Anawade et al., 2024). Environmentally, ARH serves largely remote and rugged regions. Limited infrastructure and high geographic barriers necessitate the use of telemedicine to alleviate some of the barriers to healthcare access. The coal mining and other environmental health concerns create a variety of respiratory and other health problems that ARH needs to address with specialized, regionally focused care.

    In light of external legal and environmental factors, ARH has implemented telemedicine to improve the accessibility of care at a lower cost. This also addresses staffing and access to care issues faced by ARH. Advances in technology and reimbursement by the government make telemedicine a viable option for ARH (Tresenriter et al., 2021). To be effective, telemedicine also requires cultural flexibility from the community, which ARH is addressing with educational outreach to improve the community’s acceptance and trust of virtual care.

    Introducing telemedicine will help ARH retain patients, provide specialty care, reduce financial burdens, and serve high-quality health care to those without (Tresenriter et al., 2021), especially in the Appalachians. ARH can then focus on innovative health care accessibility and the advancement of health outcomes in the community with ARH’s telemedicine care systems.

    External Macro-Environment Challenges and Opportunities

    Political Factors

    Numerous macro-environmental factors shape the context of ARHS and its telemedicine program. There is growing political will for telehealth, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provide ARHS the ability to expand services and secure federal funding. However, the risk is related to future programs and policy. Telehealth reimbursement by CMS has increased significantly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 63-fold increase in telehealth visits during 2020 (Saharkhiz et al, 2024). This has been the result of major policy changes to enhance access to health services in rural areas.

    Economic Factors

    The Appalachian region has a depressed economy, resulting in low incomes and an increased digital divide, which impacts the ability to adopt telemedicine. However, the use of telemedicine will reduce operational costs for ARHS and therefore make the use of telemedicine a financially viable option. According to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB), 30% of rural Appalachian households lack access to broadband (Population Reference Bureau, n.d.). This is a significant barrier to telehealth.

    Social Factors

    In a region with poor health and transportation accessibility, inequities can be addressed with the use of telemedicine. This is especially applicable to older and chronically ill persons. Chronic conditions affect 60% of U.S. adults, and of this population, 40% of adults have multiple chronic conditions.

    Chronic diseases cause the most disabilities and are among the most costly of the nation’s diseases at $4.1 trillion (Carney, 2023). In rural areas, there often is no public transportation, and so people must rely on their own cars. This makes telemedicine an attractive option to overcome transportation hurdles.

    Technological Factors

    There are many portable devices, and in many places, ARHS has expanded access to the internet, and ARHS must make challenging choices about whether to invest in the infrastructure and training. Growth of the smartphone has been rapid, and in 2024, 97 percent of adults in the U.S had smartphones (Pew Research Center, 2024b). Given this, ARHS might be able to make telemedicine services available to an even greater portion of the population if the smartphones that patients would use to access telemedicine services are available.

    Legal Factors

    There are many legal hurdles to providing telemedicine services, and one prominent legal hurdle is securing the proper licenses and complying with telehealth regulations and HIPAA. Legal hurdles, such as restrictions on providing healthcare services across state borders and restrictions on providing healthcare services to out-of-state clients, limit the services that ARHS is able to provide.

    Environmental Factors

    The isolation and extreme rugged geography of the Appalachian Region provides an excellent environment that creates a strong demand for telemedicine and creates many problems for delivering in-person healthcare services. Rural highways and roads may limit the ability of ARHS to expand health services in the region, but telemedicine would solve this problem.

    Data Supporting Telemedicine

    Growth in Telehealth Services

    Telehealth services rose dramatically in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. In one study by Karimi in 2022, it was found that in regions with pandemic case numbers at their peak, visits conducted via telehealth skyrocketed from less than 1% to around 80% during the months of March to April 2020. Further, during this time, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) reported a 6300% increase in the Medicare telehealth services provided from 2019 to 2020 (Karimi et al, 2022).

    Internet Connectivity Growth

    As of 2024, there is a reported 95% of American adults have access to the Internet, according to the Pew Research Center (Pew Research Center, 2024a). Although there are gaps, this suggests that American rural areas may be the next target for potential telemedicine services.

    Computer Ownership Rates by Age and Income

    Households in which the householder is under the age of 50 and in which the annual household income is over $100,000 have the highest computer ownership (IBIS, 2022). The percentage of households with computer ownership is the lowest when the householder is over the age of 65.

    Cellphone Ownership

    Cellphone ownership in the U.S. is almost universal. Usage is seen in 99% of adults 18-49, 98% of adults 50-64, and 94% of adults 65 and older. High ownership is also seen in smartphones: 97% of 18- 49-year-olds, 89% of 50- 64-year-olds, and 64% of 65 and older (Pew Research Center, 2024b). Relatively few older adults fall into the category of possessing only a cellphone, and 17% of 65-and-older adults possess only a cellphone compared to 1% or 2% of younger adults (Pew Research Center, 2024b). For lower-income and less formally educated Americans, the cell phone is especially relied on for Internet access.

    Possible External Healthcare Factors that Impact Organizational Outcomes

    Technological Trends

    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), telehealth utilization increased by 154% in March 2020 over the previous year (Koonin, 2020).

    Economic Trends

    Rural Appalachian counties had a 5% unemployment rate. For rural counties not in the Appalachian region, the unemployment rate was 4%. Rural Appalachian counties had a lower median annual household income (by over $10,000) than other rural counties in the United States. The median income for other rural counties was $59,550 compared to $48,879 for rural Appalachian counties. The percent of the rural Appalachian population living in poverty was also greater (at 19.5%) than the remaining rural American counties (14.9%). Economic distress and risk were present in about 20% of the counties in the region (Population Reference Bureau, 2024). By 2031, it is anticipated that 20% of the economy will be comprised of an annual average growth rate of 5.4% of expenditures on health goods and services in the United States. After the expiration of the COVID-19 public health emergency, it is predicted that the percentage of the population having health insurance will drop to 90%, having reached 92% or more in that period, due to unprecedented Medicaid enrollment (Keehan et al., 2023).

    Social Trends

    Appalachia had an approximately 1,371 population in 2024, and an annual population decline of -1.15% (World Population Review, 2024). The population in 2024 was 1,434, with a decrease of -4.39% since the 2020 census. The median age was 32.4 years, with average male and female ages of 37 and 28.9 years, respectively (World Population Review 2024).

    Strategic Implication of Trend Analysis

    By analyzing these trends, ARHS can identify emerging opportunities and threats, which shape its strategic planning and allocations:

    Opportunities

    Telemedicine is booming, and federal initiatives that include rural health care and CMS reimbursement permit ARHS to expand services, improve patient retention, and add to the organization’s finances. Implement federal grants and reimbursable programs for telemedicine structures, and reduce financial investments at the start.

    Challenges

    The area has low discretionary income and high unemployment, and the residents have low access and use of digital technology. ARHS is going to find extending telehealth services in the area difficult. The elderly and their low digital technology skills will require digital technology and telehealth education in order to use telehealth and improve health outcomes.

    To effectively and successfully provide telehealth services, ARHS must use government funds and provide education on telehealth. A proactive approach to incorporate telehealth services will assist ARHS in retaining and attracting highly skilled staff to assist ARHS in providing high-quality services to the residents of the ARHS area.

    Hospitals within the Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS) target rural patients in the Appalachian region struggling with access to affordable and high-quality healthcare due to age, sickness, and lack of insurance, including Medicare and Medicaid. Because of the rural nature of their service areas, ARHS has difficulties with external network supply. Services of pharmaceuticals and telemedicine technologies are critical to sustain business operations (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, 2024). The realities of the local economy, coupled with lower reimbursement from government insurance and federal changes in healthcare, are always concerns for ARHS. These challenges have resulted in ARHS concentrating its efforts on telemedicine, preventive, and wellness healthcare to decrease the external referrals for specialty services. ARHS has established patient loyalty with its culturally sensitive, local-centered services in a competitive environment of urban healthcare systems and other telemedicine services.

    Improvement of service delivery in the areas of treatment and workforce, including grants, is the goal of strategic partnerships with academic and community organizations. The healthcare staff and the board of directors are the internal stakeholders for ARHS. The external stakeholders are the patients, local government, other healthcare advocates, and funding organizations. (Appalachian Regional Healthcare, 2024). The two main services and funding sustainment legal frameworks are HIPAA and the Medicare Telehealth Parity Act.

    The policy reviews that ARHS conducts allow the organization to respond to changes in the law, reimbursement for telemedicine, and rural healthcare policies to ensure financial sustainability both for ARHS and the services they provide.

    Theories, Models, and Practices

    To analyze the Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS), the synthesis of theories, models, and practices will be essential in describing the external healthcare environments. A PESTLE analysis will take into account the political, economic, social, technological, and legal environments that aid ARHS in determining the external operational factors. Concerning the political and economic environments, ARHS is funded via Medicaid and Medicare, and thus must operate under some policies mandated by state and federal policies regarding funding for rural health. Along the lines of what is stated above, the revenue models can be adapted to offset the threat of competing urban healthcare services by using Porter’s five forces model (Pangarkar & Prabhudesai, 2024).

    The ARHS patient and client populations exhibit culturally diverse patterns and a high incidence of chronic conditions. Applying Leininger’s Transcultural Care Theory offers the potential for developing and integrating rural population-specific social care models (Petiprin, 2024). The technology of interest is telehealth, and in the context of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory, for rural integrated health systems, the implementation of technology occurs in four stages. These stages are the most applicable for this type of System (Ledger & Bakhai, 2021). Alongside this theory, Stakeholder Theory is useful in the context of interrelations of ARHS internal and external systems.

    Internally, theories such as Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory can guide the development of retention strategies that are critical to this study aimed at retaining healthcare personnel in rural areas (Lee & Lee, 2022).

    Externally, positive interactions with pertinent community-based organizations, healthcare advocates, and grant providers will promote the purpose of enhancing community health and will attract and sustain aid for the Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS). This approach will help satisfy the most pressing health needs of the Appalachian population and build confidence in the ability of ARHS to sustain the health needs of the population, particularly with the funding organizations and community stakeholders. Knowledge of the stakeholder interest aligns them with the primary purpose of ARHS and the focus of the organization in the promotion of health care equity and organizational and operational sustainability. Finally, ARHS’s revenue construct and supply chain align with the models of value-based care and the Lean Six Sigma approach.

    Value-based care shifts emphasis toward what the patient values rather than the volume of services offered. This is very important in rural locations where patients typically have lots of overlapping chronic conditions (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2024). The Triple Aim (the patient experience, the health of populations, and the per capita cost) adds some balance and direction for ARHS where the telehealth and wellness options can reduce revenue gap surprises and calm out-migration (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2024). Lean Six Sigma and Deming’s PDCA cycle can help the ARHS improve the supply chain by reducing waste and providing the staff and necessary medical supplies to remote locations (Barr & Brannan, 2024).

    A Compliance Program Effectiveness (CPE) model can create the ability for ARHS to deliver long-term, high-quality care within the changing regulatory environment by creating the ability to respond quickly to regulatory changes like HIPAA and state telemedicine laws, and preserve critical government funding that is directly tied to regulatory changes. There are lots of unknowns for ARHS, including government funding support, inadequate staffing, and the challenges of digitization and telehealth within remote regions. To counter these, ARHS is pursuing different funding opportunities like grants and partnerships, using telemedicine for specialty services, providing digital literacy training, and investing in compliance and service provision training to meet the ongoing regulatory requirements.

    Market Data Analysis

    In order to create solutions for the above challenges and opportunities related to the delivery of ARHS services, a full healthcare market analysis is required. Examples of data types that are required include: demographic data for the population of a defined area, healthcare facilities usage data, patient data, health outcomes data, and healthcare provider data. Additionally, there are possible employment status and income data, and digital readiness and coverage data, plus insurance density data that can be used to evaluate health accessibility and identify areas where a need exists that can be quickly answered, for example, through telemedicine. Medicaid and Medicare-related data, along with health services, costs, and payments data, and patients’ level of satisfaction data, will help ARHS to evaluate the job feasibility for this population and to further develop the service for those people who cannot get health services easily (Jacobs, 2021). To support ARHS service analysis, required data can be obtained from many sources to provide an interdisciplinary and field-integrated perspective. ARHS can use its resources to obtain ample data from its electronic health records and patient satisfaction surveys to assess current service quantity and quality trends.

    Generalizable data on health outcomes and socio-demographics can be drawn from sources like the CDC, HRSA, and U.S. Census (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022). Additionally, rural healthcare markets, their current usage, prices, and reimbursement costs can be understood through market analytics such as IMS Health and health care markets of Medicaid and Medicare. ARHS can understand the status of the rural health workforce through some publications of the AAMC and Licensing Boards.

    This has been done appropriately and comprehensively in a multisectoral manner with integration of data from telehealth and other sources, including EHRs, as well as epidemiological and economic data, to understand the needs of patients and the gaps in services offered. Given these data, the ARHS decides where to allocate services based on the multiple data sources combined. These data sources are referenced with time intervals to help the ARHS modify its services for Appalachian residents and to fill the gaps in service offerings, with the intention of realizing positive health impacts for the Appalachian population. The ARHS hopes to create new positive health impacts for the population of Appalachian residents with this data. If the analysis is set at the data level, new positive health impacts that were previously unrecognized can be created. The ARHS hopes to guide its rural service offerings in a way that helps set the benchmark in rural services for access, efficiency, and sustainability.

    As the ARHS scans its external environment, it is vital to think about both supportive and conflicting data, from multiple perspectives related to different dimensions of performance, including strategic and functional. The population of the Appalachian South region in the US is growing, and with it, the need for health care services and the burden created by the need for long-term care, including the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases (Jones et al., 2021). In addition, there has been a significant growth in the population of elderly and senior members of the community, who are more vulnerable to contracting diseases and are likely to increase consultations with specialists.

    Furthermore, when analyzing economic value indicators, more telehealth decreases productivity while having a positive effect on the health of the underserved. This phenomenon is obvious in the healthcare sector, which has shifted to value-based healthcare, as the focus of this approach is on the delivery of care and preventive healthcare.

    The challenges that the ARHS has to deal with will, of course, create some level of inconsistent information. Accordingly, using the data on the economic condition of the region’s population means that a large part of the population is underinsured and a considerable part of the population is uninsured due to their inability to pay for health insurance. This is due to the populations of developing countries being excluded from healthcare, which has the potential to slow down the organization’s efforts to optimally utilize its resources. Furthermore, the coverage of the population through telehealth services is a relatively new approach, and the technology, such as ARHS (Saharkhiz et al 2024), may face challenges when making its first investment and continuing to support telehealth services. There is also some fragmentation, with elderly patients who do not have adequate technological literacy or individuals in rural areas who may not have stable access to the internet as a way of putting some of the telehealth solutions into practice. These conflicting results show that for ARHS to act within the changing and brooking of healthcare opportunities and challenges, the organization has to apply a pluralism strategy.

    The interdisciplinary forecast helps ARHS understand how healthcare, the economy, and technology intersect with market efficiency to make better-informed decisions. In understanding household structures, ARHS can develop targeted healthcare initiatives through segmented marketing. For instance, the rise in one-adult households creates a need for social and mental healthcare services. In addition, the declining employment across sectors has direct and potential indirect effects on the level of healthcare expenditure by an individual, which will eventually force ARHS to rethink its service provision strategies (Murphy & Turner, 2023). The combination of all these factors gives ARHS a deeper understanding of its external environment, thus enabling it to make necessary changes to its services in a timely manner based on the demands of the community.

    Evidence-Based Strategies

    ARHS has to operate in an environment characterized by volatile funding, a scarce labor force, persistent difficulties in managing technology, and complicated regulatory issues. Within the context of the demographic and financial characteristics of rural Appalachians, ARHS has made efforts to improve both the delivery of services and the performance of the organization. As a business operating in the environment described, ARHS is compelled to design a management plan to work around the constraints of the environment and be positioned to take advantage of opportunities as they occur.

    ARHS has the potential to improve both the structure of its organization and the services that it provides to its patients by adopting the principles of evidence-based practice. A positive and proactive telehealth service infrastructure has the potential to mitigate workforce shortages and improve access to health care for patients. This aligns with the current national emphasis on developing telehealth services in the underserved areas of the country. Through telehealth service provision, ARHS will be faced with no limits of distance, as patients will be able to receive specialty consultations without traveling. The barriers of telemedicine services were overcome, and it was demonstrated that this technology not only improves access to health care, but also transforms the management of chronic health conditions, as it increases patient participation (Valdes et al., 2022). In addition, ARHS can partner with telehealth technology vendors to provide the necessary technology and train staff and patients in the technology.

    This initiative would lead to ARHS becoming a newly established firm focused on presenting innovative solutions to enhance and transform healthcare and quality improvement in the region. This initiative would lead to ARHS becoming a new firm focused on innovative healthcare solutions and improved patient outcomes in the region.

    Since most government agencies are grant-dependent, ARHS needs to diversify its funding sources to include private funding, contracting with local businesses, and other income-generating activities. These may include health-related goods and services, like short-term health assessments. Studies have shown that organizations that diversify their funding sources have a higher balance and can better manage economic fluctuations (Fleming et al., 2020). The ‘dating’ of the private sector and active searches for grant funding in rural health could augment the financial base of ARHS. Additionally, the funding of preventive care programs fulfills community needs and encourages organizations to seek funding from insurance and government agencies. This would enhance ARHS’s revenues by ensuring a stable income that would greatly assist the clinic.

    To attract and retain healthcare providers, ARHS has to put in place some kind of targeted workforce development strategy. Examples of this could include targeted healthcare residency and internship placement programs for rural healthcare through Memorandums of Understanding with the nearby Universities. Research has shown that the more students are exposed to rural healthcare, through either residency or internship, the more likely they are to practice in rural health after graduation. Further, reasonable salaries, potential transfers to other cities, and job promotions within ARHS also help create a workplace of healthcare providers. Sun et al (2024) also argue that hiring helps to fill the workforce gap and also expand the range of care that is provided to the patient. Therefore, this strategy will help to strengthen ARHS and its commitment to the sustainability of healthcare.

    Using knowledge-based strategies to improve the telehealth system, increase funding, and develop the workforce, ARHS is poised to be able to articulate and start to address some of the issues in the rural health care system. Such strategies will not only solve existing problems within the organization, but also help to improve the healthcare services that ARHS is able to provide to the Appalachian region.

    Evidence-Based Recommendations

    The ARHS implemented some solutions to deal with the organizational issues in Assessment 1. One major problem was the limited healthcare options for rural residents, including the elderly. One potential solution to this problem is that ARHS could expand telehealth services, given the rural healthcare literature demonstrates that telehealth improves access, satisfaction, and management of chronic disease (Klee et al., 2023). ARHS reduces care barriers and improves the health of rural residents with timelier consultations and follow-up communications. In addition, the attraction and retention of skilled health human resources was identified as a major challenge. Therefore, the ARHS built strategic partnerships with regional universities to develop rural-focused residency positions, thereby retaining healthcare professionals in the region when they complete their studies (Alweis et al., 2021).

    ARHS also anticipated the benefits that would come with expanding the spectrum of available funding as a method of lessening the disruptions to service that are characteristic of the region. By innovating with private partnerships, ARHS secured greater funding opportunities beyond government subsidies (Fleming et al., 2020) and engaged in the positive effort of improving the wellness of a community. A dominant culture of strategic sourcing was created, which improved the financial positioning of the entity and also the capacity to invest through technology and skilled personnel. ARHS was successful in addressing its existing challenges and in providing the foundation for the delivery of superior quality health care in rural areas. The implementation of the strategies indicates a strong systematic method of breaking down the diverse challenges faced by the organization in fulfilling its objective of offering necessary health care services to the population.

    Cohesive Solutions

    Based on the challenges and opportunities identified within the Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS), three integrated and research-based solutions are proposed. The first is to implement telemedicine. Improving the delivery of healthcare to people residing in district and rural areas, and to older persons, is of paramount importance. The telehealth system deployed by Snoswell et al. (2021) demonstrated that increased telehealth usage creates higher patient satisfaction and improved control of chronic diseases. As such, ARHS can develop a variety of easy-to-use tools and implement necessary activities to ensure patients and providers understand how to use the system. This will provide timely healthcare services, with less emphasis on geography. This solution will implement the national focus of improving value over volume in healthcare, and will improve patient satisfaction and loyalty, which is a positive outcome for the patient and the healthcare facility.

    In relation to the attraction and retention of healthcare providers, ARHS is required to design effective talent management and acquisition strategies in collaboration with local universities. Customization of internships and residency programs in the rural healthcare setting will create a stock of professionals who, through rural healthcare programs, will develop a commitment to serve the rural population. This is attributed to the saying that practicing in rural healthcare is directly related to prior rural training (Sun et al., 2024). The organization will also have to establish partnerships with rural healthcare service delivery organizations as well as small to medium enterprises to create a sustainable funding base. Through real-life community health programs aimed at specific health concerns, ARHS will improve its image to attract funding from grants and health insurance partnerships targeted at funding preventive care for chronic illnesses. All these interrelated strategies will not only address the operational challenges of ARHS, but will also create additional opportunities and strengthen the potential of the organization to lead in rural healthcare service provision.

    Impact on Stakeholders, Departments, and Organization

    The following solutions are provided to help Appalachian Regional Healthcare System (ARHS) meet organizational challenges and leverage available opportunities. First, updated telehealth systems will help connect IT, clinical, and administrative teams while providing specialty care to more rural areas (Blandford et al., 2020). This paper argues that improved technologies combined with provided training for the health-related professional workforce will enable ARHS to facilitate more efficient and effective health services while also streamlining the healthcare systems. This offers ARHS an operational and strategic focus for the healthcare profession. While the healthcare system moves toward a model prioritizing payment and services of greater value, ARHS is helping potentially improve travel time and offer faster services.

    Beyond telehealth services, other approaches address the development and retention of the workforce while solving staff deficits and enhancing the quality of care. Collaborating with universities, ARHS will be able to create training programs to generate health staff to meet the health needs of the rural population. This initiative includes cross- and inter-disciplinary collaborations of HR, education and training, and clinical services with a focus on development and the community. Furthermore, diversifying funding by the active involvement of local community participants in both business and non-business partnerships will enable ARHS to implement health projects that focus on community needs and will strengthen the organization (Alderwick et al., 2021). Collectively, these approaches provide a unified framework to improve the performance of various units of the organization, enhance the level of engagement of the stakeholders, and maintain the ability of ARHS to respond to the dynamic nature of the health care system.

    Step-by-Step Instructions to write
    HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4

    ×

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

      Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

      Contact us today and receive expert step-by-step instructions for HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4.

      Instructions File For
      HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4

      ×

        Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

        Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

        Contact us to get the instruction file.

        Scoring Guide For
        HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4

        ×

          Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

          Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

          Contact us to get the scoring guide.

          References in APA Format For
          HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4

          ×

            Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

            Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

            Below are the references used in HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4 Analyzing the Impact of the External Healthcare Environment on an Organization:

            Aguirre, R. R., Suárez, O., Fuentes, M., & González, M. A. S. (2020). Electronic health record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus11(9). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5649

            Alderwick, H., Hutchings, A., Briggs, A., & Mays, N. (2021). The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: A systematic review of reviews. BioMed Central Public Health21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1

            Alweis, R., Donato, A., Terry, R., Goodermote, C., Qadri, F., & Mayo, R. (2021). Benefits of developing graduate medical education programs in community health systems. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives11(5), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2021.1961381

            Anawade, P. A., Sharma, D., & Gahane, S. (2024). A comprehensive review on exploring the impact of telemedicine on healthcare accessibility. Cureus16(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55996

            Appalachian Regional Healthcare. (2024). About us – Appalachian Regional Healthcare. Appalachian Regional Healthcare. https://www.arh.org/about-us

            Barr, E., & Brannan, G. D. (2024). Quality improvement methods (LEAN, PDSA, SIX SIGMA)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599556/

            Bem, A., Siedlecki, R., Prędkiewicz, P., Gazzola, P., Ryszawska, B., & Ucieklak-Jeż, P. (2019). Hospitals’ financial health in rural and urban areas in Poland: Does it ensure sustainability? Sustainability11(7), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071932

            Blandford, A., Wesson, J., Amalberti, R., AlHazme, R., & Allwihan, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges for telehealth within, and beyond, a pandemic. The Lancet Global Health8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30362-4

            Carney, T. J. (2023). Advancing chronic disease practice through the CDC data modernization initiative. Preventing Chronic Disease20.

            Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Social determinants of health (SDOH) and PLACES datahttps://www.cdc.gov/places/social-determinants-of-health-and-places-data/index.html

            Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024). Value-based carehttps://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/key-concepts/value-based-care

            Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024, October 9). Affordable Care Act Implementation FAQs – Set 1 | CMS. Www.cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Fact-Sheets-and-FAQs/aca_implementation_faqs

            Fleming, P. J., Spolum, M. M., Lopez, W. D., & Galea, S. (2020). The public health funding paradox: How funding the problem and solution impedes public health progress. Public Health Reports136(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920969172

            Gharra, N. R., Gutler, M. O., & Spitzer, S. (2022). Shaping health: Conducting a community health needs assessment in culturally diverse peripheral population groups. International Journal for Equity in Health21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01735-z

            Gizaw, Z., Astale, T., & Kassie, G. M. (2022). What improves access to primary healthcare services in rural communities? A systematic review. BioMed Central Primary Care23(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01919-0

            IBIS. (2022, August 26). IBISWorld – Industry market research, reports, and statistics. Www.ibisworld.com. https://www.ibisworld.com/us/bed/percentage-of-households-with-at-least-one-computer/4068/

            Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2024). Improvement area: Triple aim and population health | Institute for Healthcare Improvementhttps://www.ihi.org/improvement-areas/improvement-area-triple-aim-and-population-health

            Jacobs, P. D. (2021). The impact of Medicare on access to and affordability of health care. Health Affairs40(2), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00940

            Jones, N., Marks, R., Ramirez, R., & Vargas, M. R. (2021). Improved race and ethnicity measures reveal U.S. population is much more multiracial. The United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/improved-race-ethnicity-measures-reveal-united-states-population-much-more-multiracial.html

            Karimi, M., Lee, E., Couture, S., Gonzales, A., Grigorescu, V., Smith, S., Lew, N., & Sommers, B. (2022). National survey trends in telehealth use in 2021: Disparities in Utilization and Audio vs. Video Serviceshttps://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/4e1853c0b4885112b2994680a58af9ed/telehealth-hps-ib.pdf

            Keehan, S. P., Fiore, J. A., Poisal, J. A., Cuckler, G. A., Sisko, A. M., Smith, S. D., Madison, A. J., & Rennie, K. E. (2023). National health expenditure projections, 2022–31: Growth to stabilize once the COVID-19 public health emergency ends. Health Affairs42(7). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00403

            Klee, D., Pyne, D., Kroll, J., James, W., & Hirko, K. A. (2023). Rural patient and provider perceptions of telehealth implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. BioMed Central Health Services Research23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09994-4

            Koonin, L. (2020). Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, January–March 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report69(43). https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3

            Ledger, J., & Bakhai, M. (2021). The temporal dimensions of health technology adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting Rogers’ diffusionist innovation theory. In J. Waring, J. L. Denis, A. R. Pedersen, & T. Tenbensel (Eds.), Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare (pp. 245–273). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82696-3_12

            Lee, J. Y., & Lee, M. H. (2022). Structural model of retention intention of nurses in small- and medium-sized hospitals: Based on Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory. Healthcare10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030502

            Murphy, C., & Turner, T. (2023). Employment stability and decent work: Trends, characteristics and determinants in a liberal market economy. Journal of Industrial Relations65(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856231151966

            Pangarkar, N., & Prabhudesai, R. (2024). Using Porter’s five forces analysis to drive strategy. Global Business and Organizational Excellence43(5), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22250

            Petiprin, A. (2024). Leininger’s culture care theory. Nursing Theory. https://nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/leininger-culture-care-theory.php

            Pew Research Center. (2024a, January 31). Internet/broadband fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech; Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/

            Pew Research Center. (2024b, January 31). Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center; Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

            Population Reference Bureau. (2024). 3 bright spots for rural Appalachia and 3 struggles compared to the rest of rural America. Population Reference Bureau (PRB). https://www.prb.org/articles/3-bright-spots-for-rural-appalachia-and-3-struggles-compared-to-the-rest-of-rural-america/

            Population Reference Bureau. (n.d.). Appalachian region data overview from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey. PRB. https://www.prb.org/resources/chartbook-appalachian-region-data-overview-from-the-2014-2018-american-community-survey/

            Pourmand, A., Caggiula, A., Barnett, J., Ghassemi, M., & Shesser, R. (2023). Rethinking traditional emergency department care models in a post-coronavirus disease-2019 world. Journal of Emergency Nursing49(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2023.02.008

            Saharkhiz, M., Rao, T., Lue, S., Borelli, S., Johnson, K., & Cataife, G. (2024). Telehealth expansion and medicare beneficiaries’ care quality and access. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network Open7(5). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11006

            Snoswell, C. L., Chelberg, G., Guzman, K. R. D., Haydon, H. H., Thomas, E. E., Caffery, L. J., & Smith, A. C. (2021). The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare29(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633×211022907

            Sun, Q. W., Forman, H. P., Stern, L., & Oldfield, B. J. (2024). Clinician staffing and quality of care in US health centers. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open7(10). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40140

            Swan, L. E. T., Auerbach, S. L., Ely, G. E., Agbemenu, K., Mencia, J., & Araf, N. R. (2020). Family planning practices in Appalachia: Focus group perspectives on service needs in the context of regional substance abuse. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(4), 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041198

            Tresenriter, M., Holdaway, J., Killeen, J., Chan, T., & Dameff, C. (2021). The Implementation of an emergency medicine telehealth system during a pandemic. The Journal of Emergency Medicine60(4), 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.11.026

            Valdes, D., Alqazlan, L., Procter, R., & Dale, J. (2022). Global evidence on the rapid adoption of telemedicine in primary care during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review protocol. Systematic Reviews11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01934-3

            World Population Review. (2024). Appalachia, Virginia Population 2024. Worldpopulationreview.com. https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/virginia/appalachia

            Be sure that your references have been updated and formatted per APA before you submit Assessment 5. See examples:

            Formatting Books (APA 7.02)

            Szostek, L., Dann, A., & Finbig, L. (2016). Essentials of finance (6th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

            Formatting Electronic Journal Articles (APA 7.01)

            Szostek, L. (2017). Applying performance methodology to reducing medication errors in healthcare settings. Journal of Six Sigma, 23(2), 215267. doi:123456.abcd/x

            There are two DOI formats, as per the APA 6th edition manual and additional supplement. These are:

            doi:10.1999/12345

            http://dx.doi.org/10.1999/12345

            Szostek, L. (2017). Applying performance methodology to reducing medication errors in healthcare settings. Journal of Six Sigma, 23(2), 215267. Retrieved from http://jss.html

            Remember, no library databases as sources like Proquest or Capella library, rather doi or journal homepage URL.

            Government or Corporate Websites (APA 7.03)

            American Hospital Association. (2017). American Hospital Association guide to the health care field. Retrieved from http://AHA.org/hcfield1234.html

            Periodicals (APA 7.01)

            Author, A. A. (year, month date of publication). Title of article. Periodical Title. Retrieved from URL

            ALSO:

            When noting multiple references with the same date, but different topics, you need to distinguish them by using lowercase letters both in the references and in citations. An example would be (2017a) (2017b).

            No hyperlinks in references.

            Be sure to delete these instructions before submitting your final reference list for Assessment 5.

            Best Capella professors to choose from for
            HCM-FPX5312 Class

            ×

              Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

              Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

              • Bradly E. Roh
              • Jama Bradley

              (FAQs) related to
              HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4

              ×

                Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

                Question 1: What is HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4 about?

                Answer 1: Assessment 4 provides evidence-based recommendations, cohesive solutions, and stakeholder impact analysis.

                Question 2: Where can I get expert help with HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4?

                Answer 2: Get expert help with HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 4 from verified tutors at TutorsAcademy.co.

                Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you within 24 hours


                  Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

                  ← Previous Assessment: HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 3 | Next Assessment: HCM FPX 5312 Assessment 5 

                  Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
                  Verification is required to prevent automated bots.

                    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                    Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

                    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

                      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

                      Privacy PolicySMS Terms And Conditions

                      Verification is required to prevent automated bots.
                      Scroll to Top